Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 68b definitions Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3 results (0.087 seconds)

Present:- Mr. D.S. Pheruman Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the liability of a person in possession of narcotic drug and psychotropic substance after november 17, 2009 and that there is no necessity to conduct pure content test to ascertain the exact quantity of narcotic drug/ psychotropic substance and manufactured drug. following the said judgment in parmanand versus state ..... of haryana and others.crm m-33959 of 2012 decided on november 2, 2012, a coordinate bench of this court had dismissed the petition of a chemist who was found in possession of manufactured drugs without valid licence issued under the ndps act ..... thereafter vide notification not s.o.1055 (e) dated october 19, 2001, the quantities in relation to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances were specified pertaining to the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances mentioned in column no.2 to column no.4. the relevant portion of the notification dated october 19 .....

Khushwant Singh @ Happy Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the petitioner, at this stage, as contrary urged on his behalf.11. not only that, the questions as to whether the possession of such manufactured narcotic drugs, psychotropic and controlled substances, falls within the ambit of the schedule of ndps or not is no more res integra and well settled.12. an identical ..... come to the rescue of the petitioner, in the instant controversy.10. what cannot possibly be disputed here is that the indicated narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and controlled salt, recovered from the possession of the petitioner, are duly described and squarely fall, within the domain of amended table/schedule, ..... from his (petitioner) possession, without any permit or license.4. after completing all the statutory procedure, the police has taken into the possession the indicated narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, vide recovery memos. on the basis of aforesaid recovery, the present case was registered against the petitioner-accused, in the manner depicted here-in .....

Crl. Misc. No. M-14819 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... as to whether exact quantity (total mass) of the contraband recovered from offender or percentage of narcotic drugs/psychotropic substances contained in it is to be taken into consideration in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations and whether the possession of such manufactured intoxicant/contraband (alprazolam), falls within the ambit ..... no.96 dated 04.09.2012, on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 22 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the ndps act'), by the police of police station sadar kapurthala, invoking the provisions of section 439 cr.p.c.3 ..... contraband seized shall be considered for the purpose of determining the commercial commodity and the possession of such manufactured narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, contravene the provisions of, and is punishable under the ndps act, rules and order, 1993. therefore, the indicated ratio of law is mutatis mutandis . is applicable to .....

Present Mr. R.P.Dhir Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... in a case registered by way of fir no.54 dated 25.4.2012 at police station dasuya, district hoshiarpur for an offence punishable under sections 21 and 22 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (for short, the act .).learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is accused of having in his possession different kinds of tablets. according ..... and 35 respectively of notification no.826-e dated 14.11.1985 of ndps act and as per definition do not falls under provision of ndps act. further the drugs buprenorphine hydrochloride, alprazolam and nitrazepam are psychotropic substance mentioned at sr.no.92, 30 and 64 respectively of the schedule of ndps act and covered under ndps act, 1985 but as per rule 66 of the said act a person .....

Present: Mr.Pardeep Goyal Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... registered against him, vide fir no.118 dated 08.09.2013, on accusation of having committed an offence punishable under section 22 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985(hereinafter to be referred as the ndps act .), by the police of police station chhajli, district sangrur.2. notice of the petition was issued to the state.3. after hearing the ..... , the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of regular bail, in terms of section 167(2) cr.p.c., in a case of commercial quantity of indicated narcotic drugs, as contrary urged on his behalf.9. in the light of aforesaid reasons, as there is no merit, therefore, the instant petition for regular bail filed by the ..... the accused, in the manner depicted here-in-above. consequently, the petitioner was arrested on 08.09.2013. it is not a matter of dispute that such drugs and psychotropic rani seema 2014.04.11 16:43 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court chandigarh crm no.m-11645 of 2014 3 substances .....

Present: Mr. Jaspreet Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the code of criminal procedure, 1973 ('cr.p.c' for short) for quashing of the fir no.38 dated 22.2.2011 under section 22 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 ('act' for short) registered at police station jodhewal, ludhiana (annexure p-1) and report under section 173 cr.p.c.(annexure p ..... the fsl report regarding recovered drugs mentioned at serial no.1 to 5 of column no.5 being branded and packed medicines. as per the record the petitioner did not have any valid licence in his name. the recovered powder contains salt dextroprop-oxyphene hydrochloride of psychotropic substances mentioned in ndps act 1985 at serial no.87 ..... schedule. hence the accused deserve to be prosecuted under ndps act 1985. in view of the opinion of the committee, no ground for interference is made out. dismissed. .....

Mohan Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)139PLR425

..... a person can claim benefit of the protection or safeguards provided under section 50 of the act and its strict compliance, the person must be possessed of the psychotropic substance or narcotic drug on his body with him. if the article parcel or a bag is lying even at a possible shortest distance from the suspect, but it is not ..... magistrate, now stands overruled by the decision in baldev singh's case (supra). if a person is carrying a bag or some other article with him and narcotic drug or the psychotropic substances is found from it, it cannot be said that it was found from his person. in this case heroin was found from a bag belonging to the ..... as under:-'one of the main grounds for the acquittal of the appellant taken up by the learned counsel for the appellant is that mandatory provisions of section 50 of narcotic drugs and phychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter called ' the act') have not been complied with as according to the learned counsel, the appellant was not given an .....

Harbans Singh Alias Lovely Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3071

..... 639 : (1994 air scw 5115). he also submitted that the remand was granted by the judicial magistrate beyond the period mentioned under section 36a(1)(b) of the ndps act. he also pointed out that joint offer was given by the police to these accused persons, which is inadmissible in evidence. lastly, he contended that actual culprits have been ..... he has to commit the case. under section 36-a(1)(d) of the act after being constituted special court is authorised to take cognizance of the offences under the ndps act without the accused being committed to it for trial. in view of this provision, in legal aid committee's case (supra), the apex court has held that '....... there ..... a magistrate under section 36-a(1)(b) of the act, further remand is to be granted by the magistrate only because there is no other provision in the ndps act providing for further remand to be granted by any other court except the magistrate till special courts are constituted. therefore, in janta singh's case (supra) it is .....

Harjinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1615

..... on rent a portion of the house of gurtej singh. it was from this house that surinder singh and shashi atwal were carrying on the activity of dealing in narcotic drugs. from this place, the police party also recovered two bags of poppy husk both weighing 30 kgs. each. in this statement, gurtej singh makes a mention ..... 2 for curbing the nexus between policemen and criminals in the drug related offences. relevant part of the action plan is reproduced as under :-in the campaign against drug dealers during the last fortnight the distinct police has registered 11 cases and arrested 12 persons under the ndps act and a recovery of 400 kgs. (approx) poppy husk was ..... made. raids were also conducted on 20 chemists shops in bathinda and rampura. action is being taken by the drug inspector against many of the owners of the shops for possessing unauthorised intoxicating drugs. a case under sections 7 read .....

Shiv Kumar Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4682

..... code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or any other law for the time being in force, on granting of bail.' 18. a perusal of section 37 of the ndps act, reproduced above, reveals that prior to the grant of bail to an accused , the following conditions have to be satisfied :-- (1) the public prosecutor has to be given an ..... comply with the conditions of section 37 of the n.d.p.s. act. counsel for the respondent contends that while considering the case, for grant of bail, under the ndps act, this court is required to take into consideration the provisions of section 37 of the n.d.p.s. act. pursuant to section 37 of the n.d.p.s ..... is no doubt true that the object of the legislature, while enacting the stringent provisions of section 37 of the ndps act, was to prevent offenders from being granted bail easily but the said intent expressed in section 37 of the ndps act cannot be construed to take away the power of the court to grant bail. the aforementioned condition does not breach .....