Court : Delhi
..... ps welcome. coram: hon'ble mr. justice r.k.gauba1 judgment (oral) the appellant was tried by the court of sessions on the charge under section 20 of narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short ndps ), the gravamen being that on 10.02.2001, at about 8:45 a.m., while being present at a public place (welcome ..... being sealed separately, cfsl form being filled up, all this besides preparation of the seizure memo (ex.pw4/a). further steps taken included service of notice under section 50 of ndps act on the appellant (ex.pw4/b), securing his reply (ex.pw4/c) thereto, the general and personal search (ex.pw10/b) of the arrestee, and preparation of ..... memo (ex. pw8/c) after his personal search (ex. pw4/d), the investigating officer (io) having prepared notice under section 52 of ndps act (ex.pw4/e) and a report under section 57 of ndps act (ex.pw1/a), which was brought to the notice of the superior police officers through asi shiv kumar. the investigating officer had also prepared .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... .2 kg of charas. learned counsel for respondent submits that petitioner is very much a party to the conspiracy, as petitioner in his statement under section 67 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 has admitted that his father used to make deposit of some money into his account and he used to withdraw it and he had told his father ..... gaur... petitioner seeks bail in complaint case no.viii/31/dzu/17, order registered by narcotics control bureau (ncb), under sections 8(c), 20 & 29 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (henceforth referred to as the ndps act ) while claiming to be innocent. learned counsel for petitioner submits that narcotic control bureau (ncb) arrested father of petitioner and by exercising undue pressure on petitioner, his .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... supreme court referred to the definition of reason to believe as contained in section 26 of the ipc in the context of sections 42 and 43 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act) as also section 110 of the customs act, 1962 (customs act) which provisions concern powers of entry, search, seizure and arrest ; and in which the requirement of reason ..... to believe has been incorporated by the legislature. in the context inter-alia of the power of seizure under the ndps act and the customs act, the supreme court had this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , 2014 vide which appellants have been convicted for the offence under section 20(c) of the narcotic drugs crl.as.785/2014 & 1235/2014 page 1 of 8 and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act ) and vide order of 29th april, 2014, appellants have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ..... and sentence awarded to appellants is hereby affirmed. however, this court deems it necessary to direct the police to henceforth produce an accused arrested under the ndps act before a nearest gazetted officer without going into the option aspect, referred to above, as it would bring transparency in the search proceedings. to ensure compliance ..... akram khan. on the basis of evidence led, trial court vide impugned judgment has convicted and sentenced appellants for the offence under section 20 of the ndps act as noticed hereinabove.5. since the challenge to the impugned judgment by appellants in these appeals is on identical grounds, therefore, both the appeals have been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... , 2014 vide which appellants have been convicted for the offence under section 20(c) of the narcotic drugs crl.as.785/2014 & 1235/2014 page 1 of 8 and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ndps act ) and vide order of 29th april, 2014, appellants have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ..... and sentence awarded to appellants is hereby affirmed. however, this court deems it necessary to direct the police to henceforth produce an accused arrested under the ndps act before a nearest gazetted officer without going into the option aspect, referred to above, as it would bring transparency in the search proceedings. to ensure compliance ..... akram khan. on the basis of evidence led, trial court vide impugned judgment has convicted and sentenced appellants for the offence under section 20 of the ndps act as noticed hereinabove.5. since the challenge to the impugned judgment by appellants in these appeals is on identical grounds, therefore, both the appeals have been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... has rejected the petitioner s appeal on the ground that it was filed beyond the period as prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 68-o of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereafter the ndps act ). admittedly, w.p.(c) 1722 of 2019 page 1 of 13 the appeal filed by the petitioner was belated and the petitioner had also filed an application ..... powers under article 226 of the constitution of india.6. briefly stated, the aforesaid controversy arises in the following factual context:-"6.1 the investigating authorities of narcotic control bureau had effected recoveries of psychotropic substances from certain persons, namely, amit kohli, diwakar gupta, nafe singh and rajesh sharma on 05.05.2008. the said persons were thereafter arrested on 06.05 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) impugned order of 28th november, 2017 finds the fsl report to be prima facie faulty and allows respondent s application for retesting of sample in proceedings under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act) relating to recovery of 1.5 kg of heroin from respondent. learned additional public prosecutor for petitioner-state assails the impugned order by pointing out that the option ..... exercised within fifteen days of receiving of fsl report. to submit so, attention of this court is drawn to supreme court s decision in thana singh vs. central bureau of narcotics (2013) 2 scc590 attention of this court is also drawn to the crl.m.c.5291/2017 page 1 of 2 clarification of 4th december, 2017 made in respect of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... /2019 (exemptions) allowed, subject to all just exceptions. crl.m.c. 840/2019 and crl.m.a. 3375 (stay) in fir no.22/2019, under section 21(c) of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 trial court vide order of 6th february, 2019 has found that the investigating officer has not adhered to the dictum of supreme court in arif khan vs .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... : hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur standing counsel order (oral) impugned judgment of 28th november, 2013 holds appellant guilty for the offence punishable under section 21(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, act, 1985 and vide order of 13th december, 2013 appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of 1,00,000/- and in default of ..... by indigo flight no.6e311 scheduled to depart at 4.55 pm on that day from the domestic airport terminal no.1d, new delhi and she would be carrying some narcotic drugs concealed in her baggage. pw1 had immediately reduced the above information in writing as crl.a.813/2014 page 1 of 4 ex. pwand had put up the same before .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... (commercial quantity being 250 grams).5. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. he further submits that the requirements of section 50 ndps act has not been complied with.6. 7.8. the petitioner has been in custody since 24.05.2017. report from frro is produced. the same is taken on ..... petitioner ..... respondent advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner : for the respondent: mr. anoop gupta, advocate. mr. hirein sharma, app for the state. asi sanjay, narcotics cell. coram:-"hon ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva judgment sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1.... petitioner seeks regular bail in fir no.75/2017 under sections ..... ndps act and section 14 foreigners act, police station crime branch.2. the allegations are that on 24.05.2017, secret information was received that two persons .....
Tag this Judgment!