Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 65 omitted Court: delhi Page 16 of about 243 results (0.080 seconds)

Mar 25 1994 (HC)

Surender Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IIAD(Delhi)116; 1994(29)DRJ65

v.b. bansal, j.(1) surender kumar has filed this application for bail for the offence under section 15 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). (2) briefly stated the prosecution story has been that on 6.6.1991, si a as mohammed while accompanied by other ..... police officials was present near dda quarters, h block in connection with a case and at about5.15p.m.,whenhereceivedasecret information that one person would becoming with some drugs at about .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2000 (HC)

Chand Khan Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)850; 2000CriLJ2645

..... of conviction dated 30.01.1997 passed by the additional sessions judge, new delhi in sessions case no. 14/96 convicting the petitioner under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (for short the 'act') and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of rupees one lac or in default to ..... marg having smack in his possession. he reduced the said information into writing vide dd entry (ex.p.w. 5/4) after giving due intimation to the d.c.p. narcotics. thereafter, he organized a raiding party comprising of sub inspector prem chand (p.w. 8), assistant sub inspector sahib singh (pw-4), head constable rajinder singh (p.w. ..... shariefu din, j, in rattan lal vs . state : 32(1987)dlt1 :- ''....in the case in hand the seizure and the arrest have been made under section 43 of ndps act. admittedly, no pubic witness was involved in the matter of search and seizure as envisaged by sub-section (4) of section 100 cr. p. c. the explanationn offered is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2000 (HC)

Mohd. Raffique Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)861; 2000CriLJ2401

..... the judgment and the order dated 20.4.99 passed by the additional sessions judge, delhi in sessions case no. 118/95 convicting the appellant under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (for short the 'act') and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of rs. 1 lakhs or in default to suffer ..... malik sharief-u din, j. in rattan lal vs . state : 32(1987)dlt1 :- '....... in the case in hand the seizure and the arrest have been made under section 43 of ndps act. admittedly, no public witness was involved in the matter of search and seizure as envisaged by sub-section (4) of section 100 cr. p.c. the explanationn offered is that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1995 (HC)

Virender Singh Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 60(1995)DLT541; 1995(34)DRJ301; 1995LC25(Delhi); 1995RLR515

..... of detention at the end, the detenu has been informed that he could make a representation if he so desires to the central advisory board (prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988) or that he could address the representation to the central government, ministry of finance. in these grounds of detention also, there is no mention of the ..... under order passed 'by one mr. a.k. srivastava, joint secretary, ministry of finance on 3.12.1993 under section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988. it is pointed out that in the said order, there is no mention of the petitioner's right to make. the representation to the detaining authorities. even .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1996 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IVAD(Delhi)42; 63(1996)DLT721

n.g. nandi, j. (1) this appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence recorded under section 18 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, , 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') in fir no. 43/87, police station chandni mahal, delhi by the learned additional sessions judge, delhi in sessions case no. ..... of cfsl is ex. pw6/b. all what is suggested is that three sealed parcels 'in connection with fir no. 43 dated 3.3.1987 u/section 18/61/85 ndps act were received as per messenger on 9.3.87. there is no reference to the receipt of cfsl form duly filled in and sent and received in laboratory. (14) thus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1997 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar @ Titoo Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)601; 1998CriLJ51; 70(1997)DLT585; 1997(42)DRJ536

..... act, 1985 hereinafter called 'the act'). the allegation was that he was in possession of 1 kg. of heroin. he was convicted and sentenced under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act on july 21, 1992. the appeal comes up today for final disposal.(2) should i confirm the order or set him free? i feel he deserves freedom. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2004 (HC)

Eze Val Okeke @ Val Eze Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 116(2005)DLT399; 2005(79)DRJ162; 2005(99)ECC152

..... . chopra, j.1. the appellant, a nigerian national, stands convicted under section 21(c) of the narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as '' act'' only) vide orders dated 28.8.2003 and sentenced to ..... conviction and sentence.2. the facts relevant for the disposal of this appeal, briefly stated, are that on 30.7.1999, the narcotics control bureau (ncb) received a secret information that one nigerian called king was having 5-6 kilograms of heroin with him for the ..... . when he was enquiring from them about his friend, they disclosed to him that they were ncb officers and had recovered some narcotics from the flat. he was taken to the office of the ncb where he was beaten, threatened and forced to sign various blank ..... the courts that the accused is guilty because no chance can be taken with the liberty of a person. no doubt that drug trafficking is a serious matter but the investigations into such offences also have to be serious and not perfunctory.9. there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2002 (HC)

Hegedus Lahel Csaba Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT868; 2003(66)DRJ569; 2003(87)ECC105

..... the pendency of the appeal has been moved on behalf of the appellant who stands convicted under section 20(b)(ii) and section 23 read with section 28 of the ndps act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' only). the appellant was sentenced by the trial court to undergo ri for 10 years and pay a fine of rs. 1 lakh, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2003 (HC)

Emmanuel O. Agbaizu Vs. N.C.B.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(68)DRJ326a; 2003(87)ECC586a; 2003(1)JCC322

..... 7,1996 and sentence dated 25.7.1996 passed by learned special judge by which the appellant was-convicted under sections 21 and 23 read with section 28 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' only) and was sentenced to undergo ri for 15 years and a fine of rs. 1 lac under section ..... contraband was recovered from the two bags which the appellant had already booked for lagos. pw-5 shri dilip kumar, inspector, central excise was posted as intelligence officer with narcotics control bureau. he had interrogated the appellant after his arrest and the appellant had made a statement exhibit pw-3/b. another statement of the appellant is exhibit pw ..... take the contraband out of india on payment. the appellant, thereforee, was not the person who was going to get himself enriched on account of the smuggling of the narcotic. he has been in custody since the date of his arrest which was 31.3.1994 and as such, he has spent almost 9 years in prison. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2002 (HC)

Shakil Ahmad @ Pappu and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)886; 96(2002)DLT586; 2002(82)ECC530

..... ahmad, accused-appellants is directed against the judgment dated 28th april 1997 and order dated 1st may 1997 of an additional sessions judge convicting them under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act (for short the 'act') and sentencing to ri for 10 years and pay a fine of rs. 1 lac each. in default of payment of fine, appellants ..... , is an extremely valuable right which the legislature has given to the concerned person having regard to the grave consequence that may entail the possession of illicit articles under the ndps act. it appears to have been incorporated in the act keeping in view the severity of the punishment. the rationale behind the provision is even otherwise manifest. the search before a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //