Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 65 omitted Court: allahabad Page 2 of about 33 results (0.490 seconds)

Parvez Quadar Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2072

..... test kit, it was found to be heroine/brown sugar. as possession, concealment etc. of heroine/brown sugar was in violation of the provisions of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 punishable under section 21 of the said act, the recovered brown sugar which weighed 700 gms. was sealed in presence of the witnesses after ..... learned counsel has also referred to section 3 of the act where words used are:'........with a view to preventing him from engaging in illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained'.learned counsel wanted to say that in view of the word ..... it will be wrong to suggest that any person in the age group of 17 or so cannot be a courier engaged in the illicit traffic of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance. therefore, the order passed against such persons under the act would be a perfectly legitimate order.11. in the end learned counsel for the petitioner .....

Mohammad Daud Alias Mohd. Saleem Vs. Superintendent of District Jail a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1358

..... , he was being prosecuted in the court of special judge, city sessions court, greater bombay for offences under sections 8(c), 21, 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as n.d.p.s. act) and was in judicial custody of the said court, when 'production warrant under section 267 of ..... challenged on the ground that the search was conducted in violation of the provisions of n.d.p.s. act, there also was not made recovery of any narcotic or psychotropic drug from him he was not disclosed the reasons or grounds for his arrest which amounted to violation of provisions of article 22(1) of the constitution, section 50 ..... of muzaffar husain alias pappu filed on behalf of the petitioner as rejoinder to the counter-affidavits, the petitioner stated that the theory of raid and recovery of narcotic drugs from the possession of the petitioner on 11-7-1989 at bombay is totally imaginary. the remand orders passed by the courts at greater bombay were against law, .....

Lawrence John Dowser (In Jail) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1985

..... act, it may be presumed, unless and until the contrary is proved, that the accused has committed an offence under chapter iv in respect of-a) any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance;b) any opium poppy, cannabis plant or coca plant growing on any land which he has cultivated;c) any apparatus specially designed or any group of utensils ..... contraband in question was in small quantity and therefore the accused appellant was liable to a lessor amount of punishment as is provided under section 27 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act. i am unable to agree. the heroin which is said to have been recovered from the bag of the accused appellant was measuring 7. ..... . k. singh, p.w. 1 nor sri v. k. singh, p.w.2, who were intelligence officers vested with the powers under the provisions of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985 were obliged to disclose as to when, where & by whom they got information about the involvement of the accused appellant in the illicit trade of .....

Raju Alias Mama Alias Ram Gopal Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4266

..... the roads there is possibility of police passing through the roads at 10.35 a.m. if a person deals in narcotic drug or psychotropic substance and is in the habit of carrying on such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in such quantity of one kg, it is quite natural that he would be cautious that he has to ..... provided under n.d.p.s. act. in these circumstances non-compliance of the mandatory sections of the act in respect of search and recovery of narcotic drug or psychotropic substance is such fact, which causes injustice to the appellant for non-compliance of these provisions. therefore, the order of conviction and sentence passed against the ..... person knowledge or information given by any personal and taken in writing that any person has committed an offence punishable under this act or that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance in respect of which any offence has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the commission .....

Mohd. Tafsheer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC89

..... mr. j.p. sharma, deputy secretary, home and confidential, government of u.p., detaining him under section 3(1) of the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1988.the detention order, alongwith the grounds of detention, which are also dated 10,7.2002, was served on the petitioner-detenu on 25.7.2002 ..... petition deserves to succeed. the substance of pleadings contained therein is that pursuant to the petitioner-detenu being arrested in the case under section 8/21, ndps act and prior to his being detained vide the impugned order he did not prefer any application for bail in any court and the detaining authority erred in clamping ..... 800 grams from the former and 300 grams from the latter. thereafter the petitioner-detenu and rakesh kumar verma were arrested and a case under section 8/21 ndps act was registered against them. on 10.7-2002 the impugned detention order was issued against the petitioner-detenu.3. we have heard learned counsel for the parties .....

State of U.P. Vs. Pramod Kumar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4677

..... so desired by him, particularly, when the authorised officer has reason to believe from his personal knowledge or information given by any person that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance is likely to be recovered. section 42 further requires the authorised officer to reduce such belief or information in writing. in this context the ..... the state government, if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing, that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv, has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence ..... blank paper.9. learned additional government advocate appearing for the state urged that the searching officer did not have information from any person that any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance was being carried by the respondent in his bag. it was a coincidence that the respondent was coming on the road from opposite .....

Sishu Pal SharmA. Vs. Union Of India Thru' Central Narcotics Bureau.

Court : Allahabad

..... bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in sst no.46 / 2004 under section 18,26 and 28 of ndps act police station vibhagiya, district budaun as soon as personal and surety bonds are furnished, photocopies of the same are directed to be transmitted to this court forthwith by the ..... to undergo further imprisonment of two years. 2. learned counsel for the appellant contended that that he is neither licencee under the ndps act nor he was found cultivating the opium without any licence in contravention of the provisions of this act and as such he could not have been convicted for the offence ..... dated 4.3.2010 passed by learned additional sessions judge, fast track court no.5, badaun in sst no.46 /2004 under section 18, 26 and 28 of ndps act police station vibhagiya, district budaun and sentencing him to undergo rigorous mprisonment of 12 years along with a fine of rs. 100000/- and in default in payment of fine .....

Ram Naresh Chaudhary and anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2346

..... of ram naresh chaudhary resident of mallah toli sahninda, p. s. mohammadabad, district ghazipur was detained under section 3(1) of prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as pitndps act) by the order dated 30-1 -93 passed by the state government. after the aforesaid order was passed, ..... person who is a 'relative' of a person in respect of whom an order of detention has been made under the prevention of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act provided such order of detention has not been revoked on the report of the advisory board or such order of detention has not been set ..... of 1993.2. chapter v which deals with forfeiture of property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic was inserted by act 2 of 1989 in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act with effect from 29-5-1989. section 68-e provides for identifying illegally acquired property and section 68-f provides for seizure or freezing of .....

Bal Mukund Jaiswal Vs. Bharat Sangh Dwara Aasuchana Adhikari Narcotic ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT(Cri)9; 1994CriLJ818

..... case under section 8/22 of the narcotic drugs and psycho-tropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as the act).2. according to the prosecution case, sri s.p. singh, an officer of the narcotics control bureau, varanasi, on receiving information that the applicant bal mukund jaiswal was dealing in psychotropic substances at his house situated in kabirchaura ..... , it is at this stage, not possible to come to the conclusion that the tablets cannot be said to be psychotropic substance.21. it should not be forgotten that the offences under the ndps act are very serious and grave and people indulging in such offences are causing havoc to the health of the inhabitants of ..... search, the applicant disclosed to the officer concerned about his activities regarding the sale and purchase of the psychotropic substances. the recovery memo was prepared on the spot which was signed by the officers of the narcotics control bureau, the witnesses of recovery as well as by the applicant. it is said that a copy .....

Jokhu Lal Vs. Central Jail and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1052

..... it. in this connection learned counsel for the state also placed before this court the provisions of section 68a(2)(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as pit ndps act). it is urged that this provision relating to forfeiture of property derived from, or used in, illicit traffic was made applicable even against ..... the persons in respect of whom the order of detention had been made under ndps act and the proviso to sub-section (c) made it ..... . it has been argued on behalf of the state that in a few cases where this court had allowed a habeas corpus petition filed under the pit ndps act only on the ground that less than a month's period was to expire and the petitioner was directed to be released forthwith, such persons had made .....