Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 35 presumption of culpable mental state Page 25 of about 349 results (0.086 seconds)

Sri Manjunatha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... act contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not render ..... mohanlal vs state of rajasthan reported in (2015)6 scc222contention came to be raised by the accused who was tried for the offence punishable under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 contending that as per the case of the prosecution the incident of theft had occurred between 12.11.1985/13.11.1985 ..... column 6 of the table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts of esters, ethers and isomers, wherever .....

Sangameshwara Coffee Estates Ltd., Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... act contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not render ..... mohanlal vs state of rajasthan reported in (2015)6 scc222contention came to be raised by the accused who was tried for the offence punishable under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 contending that as per the case of the prosecution the incident of theft had occurred between 12.11.1985/13.11.1985 ..... column 6 of the table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts of esters, ethers and isomers, wherever .....

Smt Seethavva Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... act contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not render ..... mohanlal vs state of rajasthan reported in (2015)6 scc222contention came to be raised by the accused who was tried for the offence punishable under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 contending that as per the case of the prosecution the incident of theft had occurred between 12.11.1985/13.11.1985 ..... column 6 of the table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts of esters, ethers and isomers, wherever .....

Sri H K Basavegowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... act contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not render ..... mohanlal vs state of rajasthan reported in (2015)6 scc222contention came to be raised by the accused who was tried for the offence punishable under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 contending that as per the case of the prosecution the incident of theft had occurred between 12.11.1985/13.11.1985 ..... column 6 of the table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts of esters, ethers and isomers, wherever .....

Mr G Pulla Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... act contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not render ..... mohanlal vs state of rajasthan reported in (2015)6 scc222contention came to be raised by the accused who was tried for the offence punishable under narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 contending that as per the case of the prosecution the incident of theft had occurred between 12.11.1985/13.11.1985 ..... column 6 of the table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 shall apply to the entire mixture or any solution or any one or more narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances of that particular drug in dosage form or isomers, esters, ethers and salts of these drugs, including salts of esters, ethers and isomers, wherever .....

Sumer Singh and Another Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... be presumed, unless and until the contrary is proved, that the accused has committed an offence under this act in respect of- (a) any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance; (b) any opium poppy, cannabis plant or coca plant growing on any land which he has cultivated; (c) any ..... specially adopted for the manufacture of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance; or (d) any materials which have undergone any process towards the manufacture of a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance, or any residue left of the materials from which any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or controlled substance has been manufactured ..... 1. the appellants sumer singh and balbir singh have been convicted for the offence under section 20 of the narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as ndps act, 1985) and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years, fine of rs.1,00,000/- and .....

ismail Adam Mitha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1813

..... criminalistics - an introduction to forensic science by richard saferstein, it was contended that the best test to find out as to whether the muddamal is a psychotropic substance or narcotic drug is the screening test. according to him, screening test has not been conducted in this case and, therefore, prosecution has failed to prove that said substance ..... shah and another v. state of gujarat, 1998(3) g.c.d. page 2132(guj.), it held at head note (b) as under:' (b) narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985--secs.54 and 17--presumption of possession--accused found in possession of opium--ownership is not material but possession is an offence--no satisfactory account ..... prasad and another v. state of gujarat, reported in 37(1) g.l.r. page 162, it was held at head note as under:'criminal trial--narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985(lxi of 1985)--sec.20--evidence act, 1872(1 of 1872)--secs. 101 & 102--accused charged with possession of contraband article--prosecution to .....

Manik Lodh Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... purpose, rely on the evidence of the prosecution.23. in abdul rashid ibrahim mansuri v. state of gujarat reported in : 2000crilj1384 , the apex court considered section 35 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, which reads as follows:35. presumption of culpable mental state--(1) if any prosecution for an offence under this act which requires a culpable mental state of .....

Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Regional Unit ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1909; 2008(3)KarLJ626; ILR2008(2)Kar1909; 2008(3)KLJ626; 2008(1)KCCR405; 2008(2)AIRKarR188; 2008CriLJNOC549

..... passed by the special judge, mangalore in spi. case 49/2001 acquitting the accused for the offence under section 8 c r/w section 21 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1995.2. according to the prosecution, on 7.2.2001 on receiving reliable information, as per the directions of the assistant director of revenue ..... accused was carrying huge quantify of 5 kgs of heroin and he could neither produce the license or permit and for what purpose he was carrying the narcotic drug that is, for scientific or medical purpose, it is nothing but illegal possession of contraband34. section 20 provides for punishment for carrying such contraband and in ..... institution, or a hospital or dispensary maintained or supported by government or local body or by charity or voluntary subscription, which is not authorised to possess any psychotropic substance under the 1945 rules, or any person who is no so authorised under the 1945 rules, may possess a reasonable quantity of such substance as may .....

Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2254; 2008AIRSCW5964; 2008(4)LH(SC)2896

..... section 52 provides for disposal of persons arrested and articles seized. section 52a provides for disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; sub-section (2) whereof reads as under:(2) where any narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances has been seized and forwarded to the officer in charge of the nearest police station or to the ..... contains draconian provisions. it must, however, be borne in mind that the act was enacted having regard to the mandate contained in international conventions on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. only because the burden of proof under certain circumstances is placed on the accused, the same, by itself, in our opinion, would not ..... the court to impose fine of more than maximum punishment of rs.2,00,000/- as also the presumption of guilt emerging from possession of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the extent of burden to prove the foundational facts on the prosecution, i.e., `proof beyond all reasonable doubt' would be more .....