Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 21 punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations Court: mumbai Page 2 of about 17 results (0.156 seconds)

Jul 13 1994 (HC)

Vinod Son of Satyanarayan Lohiya Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(1)BomCR483

..... interference by this court. the learned public prosecutor also submitted that accused/appellant vinod has failed to discharge burden under section 27 of the ndps act, 1985 that the narcotic drug or the psychotropic substance found in his possession, though in small quantity, was meant for his personal consumption and, therefore, section 27 of the act is ..... available at side and have not been produced. it may be stated here that in the matters relating to search and seizure of contraband like narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances, everybody does not want to be involved in the conduct of search and seizure procedure and unless the witnesses given their consent to accompany ..... government by the notification in the official gazette. (2) where a person is shown to have been in possession of a small quantity of a narcotic drug or psychotropic dubstance, the burden of proving that it was intended for the personal consumption of such person and not for sale or distributon, shall lie on such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2008 (HC)

Mrs. Oluwole Mutiat Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Narcotic Control ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR2127

..... act 2001, the sentence structure underwent a drastic change. the amending act for the first time introduced the concept of 'commercial quantity' in relation to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances by adding clause (viia) in section 2 which defines this term as any quantity greater than a quantity specified by the central government by notification ..... offence under section 8(c) punishable under section 23 read with section 28, and for the offence punishable under section 29 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter referred to as 'ndps act'). under each head, the appellant has been sentenced to ri for ten years and fine of rs. 1 lakh in default ri ..... one or more neutral substance's for the purpose of imposition of punishment, it is the content of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance which shall be taken into consideration. in the present case, the narcotic drug which was found in possession of the appellant as per the analyst's report is 60 gms. which is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1995 (HC)

The Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Mr. Naushad Ali ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR22

m.s. rane, j.1. the petitioner herein is an intelligence officer in narcotic control bureau working under the provisions of narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, (hereinafter referred to as the said ndps act for brevity sake). respondent no. 1 is one of the accused in a case being ndps special case no. 284 of 1992 ..... on the file of special judge, greater bombay for the various offences registered under the provisions of the said ndps act, customs ..... .p.c. comes across a person being in possession of the narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances then two aspects will arise. if he happens to be one of those empowered officers under the ndps act also then he must follow thereafter the provisions of the ndps act and continue the investigation as provided thereunder. if on the other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1998 (HC)

Smt. Dina Hazarilal Kachera Vs. A.K. Srivastava and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999CriLJ236

..... till 7-2-1996. in the said factual matrix the detaining authority concluded in paragraph 11 that if not prevented, the detenu would continue indulging in illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances and consequently in paragraph 12 recorded the subjective satisfaction that there was compelling necessity, in view of the likelihood of his being granted bail and of his indulging in ..... not enough for preventive detention unless there was material to justify the apprehension that the detention would be necessary in order to prevent him from engaging in illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, in case of his release on bail. a mere possibility of release on bail and a bald statement that the detenu would repeat his criminal activities was alone .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2011 (HC)

Satnamsingh Son of Gurudayal Singh Sodi. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

..... for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, but the accused pleaded not guilty to the said charge and claimed to be tried. 7. to substantiate the charge levelled against the accused ..... is produced at exhibit 62. accordingly, after completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985. 6. thereafter, learned sessions judge & special judge, nanded, framed charge against the accused on 20-8-1999 at exhibit 17, ..... & special judge, nanded, in special case (ndps) no. 24/1998, thereby convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under section 18 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985, for the alleged unlawful possession of 685 gms. opium, and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for term of 12 years and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1994 (HC)

Syed Jamir S/O Syed Usman Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(2)BomCR259

..... of the state government, if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing, that any narcotic drug, psychotropic substance, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the commission ..... personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken in writing that any person has committed an offence punishable under chapter iv or that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance in respect of which any offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the ..... iv, or for the search, whether by day or by night, of any building, conveyance or place in which he has reason to believe any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2000 (HC)

Mohamed Rashid Mohamedi Vs. V.M. Dosi, I.O., Ncb, Mumbai

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(144)ELT279(Bom)

..... of all the suspects including the appellant showed that there were certain foreign bodies present in their abdomen and, therefore, they were suspected of having swallowed the narcotic drugs in capsule forms for carrying them abroad.4. thereafter all the suspects including the appellant were taken to the office of ncb and were shown arrested under memo ..... was found either from the checked-in baggage or from the hand bag of the appellant. accordingly panchnama was drawn. when asked whether he was carrying any narcotic drugs by swallowing inside the body or concealed in cavity or anywhere, it was denied by this appellant as well as other accused. the appellant and others were ..... the special judge for offence under section 8(c) read with section 21 as well as under section 28 read with section 23 of the ndps act for possessing 40 capsules containing narcotic drug viz. heroin hidden in the body cavity with intention to export the same. the accused denied the charge and claimed to be tried.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 1999 (HC)

Syed Yusuf Syed Noor Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3409

..... sabharwal, c.j.1. the appellant was prosecuted for an offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii) and section 27 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ndps act'), on the allegations that on 29th february, 1996, an information was received that he was possessing and selling brown sugar in his ..... that the concerned officer, if he has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing, that any narcotic drug, in respect of which an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed, he may enter such premises, conduct search and effect seizure and arrest without ..... from the police station. it does not record the reason of belief contemplated by section 42(1) of the ndps act. alternatively, assuming that the officer to whom the information was given about the appellant selling narcotic drug at his residence was p.w.6, in that eventuality, he was required to record reasons to believe .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2000 (HC)

SadruddIn Mohamed HuseIn Jundah Shah Vs. D.C.B. Cid, Narcotic Cell, Az ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000CriLJ2329

..... pay a fine of rs. 1,00,000/- (rupees one lac only) in default to suffer imprisonment for two years, under section 21 read with section 8(c) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (also referred to as the n.d.p.s. act).in short, the prosecution case runs as under :-on 13th october, 1990, p.i. alimulla akbar ..... carrying. he gave evasive replies. thereafter, he was informed by p.i. alimulla khan and others that they were police officers and they suspected that he was in possession of narcotic drugs, on the basis of the information received by them. he was also informed whether he wanted his search to be taken in the presence of a gazetted officer or a ..... deserves to be allowed.4. it is well settled that where a person is sought to be searched for possession of narcotic drug, by an authorised officer on the basis of prior information that he was in possession of such a drug, he has to be apprised under section 50(1) of the n.d.p.s. act whether he would like to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 1989 (HC)

Anilkumar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR506; 1990CriLJ2058

..... was found and that material is in itself relevant for cancellation of the bail.11. the learned public prosecutor strenuously urged before us that the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 is a code in itself and this statute overrides some provisions of the code of criminal procedure. there is a special ..... learned magistrate though the case was exclusively triable by the court of session and the material that petitioner was in fact found in possession of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance was not produced before the magistrate, was left on only suspicious when he granted the bail. subsequently the prosecution did collect the material ..... code of criminal procedure. the provisions of s. 439(2) would well be applicable inasmuch as they do not contravene any provisions of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act. the sessions judge would have the power to cancel the bail in appropriate circumstances and these appropriate circumstances are present in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //