Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 section 14 special provision relating to cannabis Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 1 of about 30 results (0.185 seconds)

Rajesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT559

..... received information on 5.5.2008 from an informer about a group of persons dealing in illicit smuggling of prescription drugs listed in the schedule of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act). the names of the persons intimated were (i) shri rajesh sharma of shakarpur, delhi (ii) shri diwakar ..... concealment, use or consumption, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or transshipment, of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances; (iv) dealing in any activities in narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances other than those provided in sub-clauses (i) to (iii); or(v) handling or letting any premises for the ..... on export.-(1) subject to the provisions of sub-rule (2), no person shall export any of the narcotic drug or psychotropic substance or preparation containing any of such narcotic drug or psychotropic substance specified in schedule ii to the countries or to the region of such country specified therein.(2) notwithstanding .....

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs.amit Kumar

Court : Delhi

..... serial number 10 and the entries relating thereto, the following serial number and the entries shall be inserted, namely:-"s. no. 11oa note: the schedule the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985) was amended vide number s.o. 785(e), dated 26th october, 1992 and subsequently by s.o. 49(e), ..... , manufacture, possess, sell, purchase, transport, warehouse, use, consume, import inter-state, export inter-state, import into india, export from india or tranship any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, shall- except for medical or scientific purposes and in the manner and to the extent provided by the provisions of this act or the rules or orders ..... m.c. 5320/2013 page 6 of 14 president on 16 september 1985. it came into force on 14 november 1985 as:-"the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (shortened to ndps act).17. the general procedure adopted to deal with the custody and disposal of the property are given under the relevant provisions of sections .....

Anand Synthochem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1984)(17)ELT583TriDel

..... of the thing assessed. sugar and alcohol find use as or in drug manufacture, but nobody has suggested their assessment as drugs. hawley's dictionary defines "drug"- "a substance that acts on the central nervous system e.g., a narcotic, hallucinogen barbiturate, or psychotropic drug. (2) a substance that kills or inactivates disease-causing infectious organisms. ..... (3) a substance that affects the activity of a specific bodily organ or function. (4) according to the fda, a drug is a substance "intended for use in the ..... to argue that their reasonings are supported by the tribunal itself. the product cannot be sold to any one but a person licensed to manufacture drugs.5. the learned counsel for the department opened his address by pointing out that hiwley's condensed chemical dictionary does not refer to sodium lauryl .....

Powell Nwawa Ogechi Vs. the State (Delhi Administration)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi181; 1986RLR577

..... of judicial opinions and requires consideration by a larger bench. (2) the petitioner was arrested in case f. 1. r. no. 60 of 1986 under section 17122161185 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 recorded at police station railway new delhi station. the arrest was made on 3-2-1986. he was remanded to judicial custody with effect from 4-2 .....

V. Srinivasana Vs. Kishore Dev Mukherjee and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1986(3)Crimes262; 30(1986)DLT378; 1986RLR616

..... magistrate, new delhi, process was issued against the accused kishore dev mukherjee respondent no. 1 and v.k. jain respondent no. 2 u/ss 21 and 29(1) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, on the complaint filed by shri v. srinivasan, superintendent, directorate of revenue intelligence, new delhi. (3) against the said order of summoning, a revision petition was .....

Peter Robertson Cowan Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 31(1987)DLT305

malik sharief-ud-din, j. (1) the appellant aggrieved by his conviction and sentence has preferred this appeal. he was convicted under section 20 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter called ndps act) and on 24th may 1986 was sentenced to 10 years' rigorous imprisonment and to the fine of rs. one lakh in default of payment of which he was required to ..... consideration is whether the sample seized from the appellant was actually sent to cfsl or not (5) in this connection i would like to refer to section 55 of the ndps act 1985 which is as under : 'policeto take charge of articles seized and delivered: an officer-in-charge of a police station shall take charge of and keep in safe custody .....

Rattan Lal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(2)Crimes29; 32(1987)DLT1

malik sharif-ud-din, j. (1) the appellant was convicted under section 21 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter for short known as ndps act) and was sentenced to undergo r. i. for 10 years and also to the fine of rs.one lakh and in default to further undergo r ..... personally feel that the learned counsel fear the appellant is justified in raising these contentions. in view of the nature of punishment provided for the offence under the ndps act the legislature has deliberately made. certain provisions to afford safeguard so that innocent persons are not harassed. if the investigating agency deliberately ignores to comply with the ..... obviously, there is a deliberate attempt to defeat the legislative safeguards. (6) that apart, there is nothing to indicate that the provisions of section 57 of ndps act have been complied with. under the provisions of this section a full report as to the particulars of arrest and seizure has to be submitted to the immediate .....

Kirpal Mohan Virmani Vs. Tarun Roy and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1988(2)Crimes196; 1987(14)ECC98; ILR1987Delhi554

..... (p) ltd. india and m/s. sheikh and pandit, calcutta. the machinery along with hashish and the truck were seized under the provisions of the customs act, 1968 and narcotic drugs and psychotropic act. later on, the business and residentialpremises of the clearing agents were searched but nothing incriminating was recovered. (3) shri joginder singh, driver of the truck in his statement disclosed .....

Ram Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 33(1987)DLT188

..... not in possession of any writing of a gazetted officer authorising him to arrest and search a particular .person, suspected of being in possession of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance. further more, the sub-inspector had not recorded the substance of the secret information which allegedly was furnished to him before the time of the ..... in the investigation of this case. admittedly, he was not specifically authorised by the gazetted officer to search and arrest a person suspected of carrying the drug or narcotic substances and this was the precise reason that he asked for and the accused expressed bids desire to be searched in the presence of a gazetted officer. ..... whose presence is not disputed, was within his right to order the search and seizure of the narcotic substance. it was just not possible for any of the police officers to have planted heavy amount of the psychotropic substance on the accused. all the police officers could not have joined bands in falsely implicating the .....

Pravesh Kumar Ahluwalia Vs. the Suprintendent, Central Jail and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(3)Crimes863; 33(1987)DLT171

..... bureau, new delhi and the west bengal police for investigating a case which had teen registered under section 22/29 of the narcotics drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (hereinafter called the 'act') but was formally produced before the metropolitan magistrate on 4th august, 1987 at her residence in the evening ..... be legal or justified. we, thereforee, direct that the petitioner be released forthwith. the other points raised to challenge the statements recorded by the officials of the narcotics control bureau or the questions regarding the very initiation of the proceedings do not arise for consideration at this stage in view of the orders which we have passed ..... judge, new delhi released the petitioner on bail for the offence under section 22/29 of the said act in a case registered in delhi on the asking of the narcotics control bureau. (3) the petitioner, however, was not produced before the. chief judicial magistrate, alipur (calcutta) on 7th september, 1987 or on any day earlier .....