Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mussalman wakf validating act 1930 section 1 short title Sorted by: old Year: 1915 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.324 seconds)

Muhammad Bukth Majumdar Vs. Dewan Ajmon Raja and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 32Ind.Cas.701

..... it is this. from the judgment of the munsif, it appears that the validity or invalidity of the wakf was a matter that came before the high court and was a subject of adjudication in the high court. we have been told in the course of the ..... to which the decree related, was not before him and that he had no means to form an opinion as to whether or not it was a void and invalid wakf as the court had decided in a previous litigation.2. we are in the same predicament. but there is another aspect of the case by which we are influenced and ..... affirmed on legal grounds. the result then is that there is an adjudication by the high court on the invalidity of the wakf which is based on legal grounds, and ordinarily we should feel bound, not on the principle of res judicata but out of the deference which is due to a previous .....

Coppage Vs. Kansas

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be arbitrary unless it be supportable as a reasonable exercise of the police power of the state. but, notwithstanding the strong general presumption in favor of the validity of state laws, we do not think the statute in question, as construed and applied in this case, can be sustained as a legitimate exercise of ..... case, we are not called upon to consider other and independent provisions of the act, such, for instance, as the provisions relating to arbitration. this decision is therefore restricted to the question of the validity of the particular provision in the act of congress making it a crime against the united states for an agent or ..... of the questions controlled by different principles. the right to join labor unions is undisputed, and has been the subject of frequent affirmation in judicial opinions. acting within their legal rights, such associations are as legitimate as any organization of citizens formed to promote their common interest. they are organized under the laws of .....

United States Vs. Hiawassee Lumber Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... theretofore taken in accordance with the requirements of the law as it existed before the code, including probates thus taken subsequent to the ratification of the code and before the validating act. and see cozad v. mcaden, 148 n.c. 10, 12, containing a dictum to that effect. but we need not go so far, since it is not and cannot ..... be questioned that the act validates and admits to registration probates taken before the code and in accordance with the law as it stood when they were taken. the court of appeals, referring to this ..... passed on was clearly reserved by the exceptions. the deed from olmsted to stevens, its probate, and its registration in clay county in 1869, having been validated "to all intents and purposes" by the act of 1870 -- long prior to the derivation of defendant's title from olmsted -- we must next consider the deed from stevens to the united states. for .....

The Advocate General Vs. Jimbabai

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1915)17BOMLR799

..... inherited property. we follow mahomedan law, that is my opinion.113. haji abdul latif is the kazi of bombay:cutchi memons i know, they are undoubtedly mussalmans; but those who have acted contrary to the mahomedan law must be excluded. in cases of divorce memons come to me and get it.114. in cross-examination, nothing material. in ..... mahomedans. but a liberal use of the convenient doctrine of cy pres, which is surely elastic enough to reach almost anything, which judges wish to reach, might have validated the technical defects, and cured the infirmity. the ground of the rule in england appears to have been that as all charities were the special care, and under ..... inheritance, but that they were governed by the hindu law of succession and inheritance. all that the issues suggest and the evidence proves is that there was a valid custom or usage inconsistent with the mahomedan law. sir erskine perry appears to have thought that it was, in a measure, analogous with the hindu law of succession .....

Atimannessa Bibi Vs. Abdul Sobhan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 32Ind.Cas.21

..... the chief qadi; but even here the balance of opinion of jurists favours the view that power should be expressly conferred on the chief qadi to validate the administration of wakfs by him. there is also authority to show that the supreme authority in the state, by whom the qadi is appointed, need not be a ..... it follows accordingly that a subordinate judge, who has not been expressly authorised by the government to exercise functions in connection with the administration of wakfs, is not competent to act in that behalf. whether a district judge has implied authority to exercise the functions performed by a qadi under the muhammadan law is doubtful. in ..... the implicit he possesses both, like his (sultan's) saying, 'appoint whomsoever thou likest, supersede (substitute) whomsoever thou likest,' for it is the chief qadi who acts as he pleases respecting them (qadis) as regards investiture or dismissal (durr-al-mukhtar, page 529, edition calcutta).(translation of text x.)17. the appointment of a .....

Truax Vs. Raich

Court : US Supreme Court

..... who are engaged on public work or receive the benefit of public moneys. the discrimination here involved is imposed upon the conduct of ordinary private enterprise. the act, it will be observed, provides that every employer (whether corporation, partnership, or individual) who employs more than five workers at anyone time, "regardless of kind ..... a prosecution, the employer was about to discharge the complainant. averring that there was no adequate remedy at law, the bill sought a decree declaring the act to be unconstitutional and restraining action thereunder. soon after the bill was filed, an application was made for an injunction pendente lite. after notice of this ..... subdivision thereof." "sec. 2. any company, corporation, partnership, association or individual, their agent or agents, found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to a fine of not less than one hundred ($100.00) dollars, and .....