Court : Karnataka Dharwad
:1. : IN TH E HI GH COURT OF KA RNATA KA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17t h DAY OF SEPTEMBER2014PRESENT THE HON 'BL E MR. J USTI CE RAM MOHAN REDDY THE HON 'BL E MR. J USTI CE B.MAN OHAR AND I.T.A . No .100042 OF2014BETWEEN: VENUGRAM MULTIPURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., SHANIWAR KHUT, BELGAUM, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, SUNIL S/O. MOHAN RAO POTDAR, AGE:54. YEARS. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI & SRI. H.R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATES) AND: THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD12), FK COMPLEX, B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELGAUM. (BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) ... RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 AGAINST IN ITA.NO.402/PNJ/2013 DTD:17.04.2014 ON THE FILE OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. THE ORDER PASSED :2. : This appeal coming on for Admission this day, Ram Mohan Reddy, J.delivered the following: JUDGMENT The assessee has come up in appeal invoking Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1993Bom91; 1993(1)MhLj1
ORDERMRS Sujata Manohar, J.1. Theappellants Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Ltd. are a multi-State Co-operative Society. The appellant-society is deemed to have been registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act 1960 as well as the Multi- State Co-operative Societies Act 1984. The appellants carry on the business of banking. The 1st respondent had filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in this Court challenging the resolution of the appellantBank dated 21st of May 1987 and the consequent termination of his services by the appellant-Bank. A learned single Judge of this Court, by his judgment and order dated 31st March 1989, allowed the petition and ordered reinstatement of the first respondent with backwages as set out in the judgment and order. From this judgment the present appeal was filed by the appellants.2. One of the questions which the learned single Judge was called upon to decide was whether the appellant Bank was 'State' within the meaning of Ar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
1. The appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge-I, Fast Track at Panaji in Civil Suit No.304/2004 on 30/7/2008, by which the civil suit filed by the original plaintiffs is partly decreed and it is declared that the Deed of Mortgage dated 4/2/1991 executed by the original defendants no.1,2,6 and 7 and the award passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co- operative Societies, Panaji, in Case no. ABN/DRCS/31/95 on 26/12/1995 and the auction proceedings dated 2/4/1998 and the Certificate of Sale dated 29/10/1998 are null and void abi-initio. By the impugned Judgment and Decree it is directed that the Sub Registrar of Registration should cancel the registration of the Deed of Mortgage dated 4/2/1991. This appeal is filed by (i) The Chief Executive Officer, Goa State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and (ii) the Branch Manager, Goa State Co- operative Bank Ltd., who were the original defendants no.6 and 7. 2. The relevant facts necessary for consideration of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1987KAR1788
ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. These petitions are disposed of at the stage of preliminary hearing after notice to respondents. They are disposed of by this common order as questions of law, and to some extent the questions of facts are common to all the petitions.2. In Writ Petition No. 6896/1986, the petitioners are workmen of Gouribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane Limited, represented by the employees Union, both of the workers as well as the officials. In Writ Petition No. 6897/1986 the petitioners arc workmen of Gouri Industries (Distillery) represented by Gouri Sugar Factory (Distillery) Employees' Union, by its President. The respondents are State of Karnataka, the Director of Sugar and Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies in Karnataka, Sri R.L. Jalappa, Minister for Co-operation, Government of Karnataka the Management of Gouribidanur Sahakara Sakkare Karkhane (in Liquidation), the Management of Gouri Industries (Distillery) represented by its partners, the Union of In...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. BLAPL No.18388 OF 2014 An application under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. -------------Pravata Kumar Tripathy .. Petitioner Opp. Party -VersusUnion of India (C.B.I) For Petitioner : For Opp. party: - - M/s. Pitambar Acharya, B.K. Jena, J.P. Parida, Mrs.S.Upadhyay Mr. V.Narasingh ------------P R E S E N T :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO . Date of Argument. 16.10.2014 Date of order- 20.10.2014 . S.K.SAHOO, J.What light is to the eyes- what air is to the lungs what love is to the heart, liberty is to the soul of man.. -Robert Green Ingersoll The petitioner who is a sitting M.L.A. of Banki Assembly Constituency in the Odisha Legislative Assembly has approached this Court in an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. 2 apprehending arrest in connection with CBI/SCB/KOL Case No.RC.47/S/2014-Kol. dated 5.6.2014 registered under sections 120-B,294,341,406,420,467,468,471,506 read with section 34 Indian Penal Code and section 3,4 and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [2001]104CompCas439(Guj)
ORDERS.D. Dave, J.1. Under a tripartite agreement between the workers, the workers' co-operative society and the mills company (in liquidation), the said mills company used to deduct amounts at the specified rate, from the worker's wages every month, and to transmit the same to the credit society to enable it to credit the amounts so received in the accounts of the workmen individually against the dues of the credit society. An amount of a significant value had remained with the mills company till the orders of winding up. The question before me is, as to whether the said money can be said to have been impressed with the character of trust money, for which the credit society can make a preferential claim, or whether the said money can be said to be the assets of the mills company in liquidation, for the recovery of which the credit society shall have to lodge a claim before the official liquidator, which once again shall have to rank pari passu with the dues of the secured creditors un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1990SC1563; (1990)92BOMLR304; JT1990(2)SC200; 1990(1)SCALE398; (1990)2SCC288; [1990]1SCR862
ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Can a licensee occupying a flat in a tenant-co-partnership society be evicted therefrom under Sub-section (1) of Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (Act No. XXIV of 1961), hereinafter called 'the Societies Act', notwithstanding the protection extended by Section 15A of the Bombay Rents, Hotels & Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (Act No. LVII of 1947), hereinafter called 'the Rent Act', as amended by Act XVII of 1973 or whether such proceedings would be governed by Section 28 of the Rent Act? That is the question which arises for our determination in the context of the fact that the appellant licensee claimed to be in actual possession of the flat on 1st February, 1973, under a subsisting licence, albeit without the express permission of the society. The factual matrix in which this question needs to be answered may be briefly stated as under:3. The Vishwa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., respondent No. 1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.735 OF2014HARBHAJAN SINGH .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) W I T H WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1116 OF2019A N D CIVIL APPEAL No.6614 OF2022(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.4733 OF2022 JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.735 OF2014AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1116 OF20191. The above writ petitions are preferred challenging the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 20141, creating a separate juristic entity for the management of historical Gurdwaras in the State of Haryana mentioned in Schedule I; Gurdwaras having income of more than Rs.20 1 For short, the Haryana Act 1 lakhs in Schedule II and the Gurdwaras having income of less than Rs.20 lakhs in Schedule III.2. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara Management Bill, 2014 (Bill No.28-III A of 2014) provides that the Bill is an earnest effort to provide a legal ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2000)4GLR71
M.S. Shah, J.1. These petitions purporting to be petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, but which are in substance petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution, raise a common question of law about the jurisdiction of the Board of Nominees of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Gujarat State at Ahmedabad in entertaining and deciding the arbitration suits (also known as Lavad Suits) under Section 96 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The main contention is that the suit filed by respondent No. 3-Bombay Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd. being a Multi State Co-operative Society under the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984 and having its registered office as well as head office in Maharashtra State, was not maintainable before the Board of Nominees in the State of Gujarat.2. The facts leading to filing of these petitions are similar and may briefly be stated as under :-2.1 Special Civil Application No. 3029 of 1997 is filed by Govindbhai Muljibhai ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:29. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition Nos.25699, 25882, 25889, 25890, 31749, 24817 to 24820, 23753, 23754 , 25824 to 25826, 26005 to 26010, 26193 to 26197, 24793, 24918, 24919, 24917, 25591 to 25594, 27809 to 27834, 28051, 26980, 26467 to 26479, 31934, 25089, 26870, 30542, 25993, 27055 to 27059, 26440, 26441, 27746, 27792, 28530, 28800, 30305, 33951, 25972, 27846, 23528, 23529, 26811, 31066, 31067, 25708, 26047 to 26051, 26076 to 26079, 26080 to 26084, 26134 to 26137, 26138 to 26142, 26171, 26172 of 2012 and W.P.No.491 of 2013, 25343, 25950 to 25952, 26487, 26504, 24187 to 24189, 31020, 26088, 26089,27758, 26342, 24473, 24866, 25173, 25386, 28175, 28176, 29028, 26932, 26851, 27358, 27558, 27700, 28445, 29574, 29630, 34058, 34489 of 2012, W.P.Nos.922, 1126, 1127, 1016 and 1260 of 2013 and W.P.(MD)Nos.12871 and 12273 of 2012 & Connected Miscellaneous Peti...
Tag this Judgment!