Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mulki rules act 1972 Court: chennai Page 4 of about 10,640 results (0.120 seconds)

T.M.Thangaraj Vs. the Assistant Electricity Engineer

Court : Chennai

..... but a perusal of the order of the regulatory commission shows that instead of issuing a direction to the government of tamil nadu to frame rules, as prayed for by the tneb, the regulatory commission merely clarified that despite section 43 of the electricity act, 2003, the electricity board cannot issue service connection to saw mills, which did not have a proper license from the central empowered committee. ..... commencement of saw milldate of application for licensefate of the application1379/2010t.m.thangaraj24.09.2003nil -2985/2010a.ammathu rahimaduring 2004applied to principal chief conservator of forests on 18.12.2009 by letter dt 21.4.2010, the petitioner informed that the exercise to frame rules is in progress.4248/2010k.chellam16.03.2001nil -8521/2011k.sennath begumduring 2007application filed on 3.6.2011central empowered committee, by letter dt. ..... in para 3 above, reads as follows:-it shall be open to apply to this court for relaxation and/or appropriate modification or orders qua plantations or grant of licenses therefore, if the petitioners were aggrieved by the failure of the state to frame rules, they should have approached the supreme court, in terms of the aforesaid portion of the order. ..... , it is open to the petitioners to apply for and obtain licenses under the new set of rules, from the central empowered committee and thereafter act accordingly. ..... the rules were issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 26, 35 and 63 of the tamil nadu forests act, 1882 .....

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Modi Kondayya

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1947Mad184; (1946)2MLJ311

..... hundred rupees, and(b) in the case of a subsequent conviction, with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.with regard to the standard of purity referred to in section 5(1)(d) of the act, the rules relating to the standard prescribed for buffalo's milk are rules 19 and 20 which are in these terms : rule 19 : where a sample of buffalo's milk (not being sold or offered for sale as skimmed or separated milk) contains less than 4.5 per cent, of milk fat, it shall be presumed for ..... the purposes of the act, until the contrary is proved that the milk is not genuine, by reason of the abstraction therefrom of milk-fat, or the addition thereto of water.rule 20 : where a sample of buffalo's milk whether sold, or offered for sale as buffalo's milk or as skimmed or separated buffalo's milk, contains less than 9 per cent ..... to recognise and give effect to any such exception on a priori grounds would be contrary to the spirit and intendment of the act and the rules and would enable a milk vendor to adulterate milk to any extent he pleases and escape libaility altogether by merely applying some heat to the milk.8. .....

Kallakurichi Co-operative Sugar Mills Limited and anr. Vs. the State o ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]60STC113(Mad)

..... recognised the statutory price as the purchase price of the sugarcane and the transport charges as an amount payable by the grower, but advanced by the sugar mills or factories and subsequently recovered from the grower, that rule 6(c) of the rules under the act would not be applicable as the amounts deducted towards transport charges had not been charged for separately without being included in the price and that the ..... these tax revision cases, though preferred by two different assessees under section 38 of the tamil nadu general sales tax act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act), are dealt with together as they arise out of a common order of the tribunal and a common question also arises for decision. ..... 581 of 1978 is in respect of the assessment under the additional sales tax act for the assessment year 1974-75 in relation to madurantakam co-operative sugar mills ltd. 2. .....

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Kodali Arjuna Rao and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1947Mad374; (1947)1MLJ327

..... further question that has to be considered is whether mere possession of adulterated milk constitutes by itself an offence within the meaning of rule 27 and whether there is scope for an inference from the mere factum of possession that such possession was for the purpose of ..... the learned public prosecutor invites my attention to sub-section (2) of section 5 of the madras prevention of adulteration act which lays down that in every prosecution for an offence under this section, the court may presume that any food found in the possession of a person who is in the habit of manufacturing or storing ..... section 20 of the act empowers the local government to make rules generally to carry out the purposes of the act and in particular inter alia to prescribe standards of purity for ..... sheet in the case was filed by the executive authority of the gudivada municipality and the respondents were alleged to have committed offences under rules 27 and 29 of the rules framed under section 20 of the madras prevention of adulteration act and also under section 109 read with section 138 of the public health act. ..... no other provision in the act or in the rules has been brought to my notice under which an inference can be drawn that such possession was for the ..... reasons, i agree with the learned sub-divisional magistrate that neither the first accused nor the second accused is guilty of having contravened the provisions of the madras prevention of adulteration act or rules 27 and 29 framed under that act. .....

Sri Ram and Co. Lesse of Sri Rama Rice Mills Tirppur and ors. Vs. Stat ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1979)IILLJ481Mad

..... government that the government are not bound to accept the advice, and that consequently any contravention of section 9 in the constitution of the committee or any irregularity in the functioning of the committee contrary to rule 12 of the minimum wages (tamil nadu) rules referred to already will not in any way vitiate the ultimate notification issued by the government either fixing the minimum wages or revising the minimum wages already fixed. ..... by the government under clause (b) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (3) of section 3 and sub-section (2) of section 5 of the minimum wages act, 1948 (central act xi of 1948) hereinafter referred to as the act, revising the minimum rates of wages revised in the industries, labour and co-operation department notification no. ..... that in fixing minimum rates of wages in respect of any scheduled employment for the first time under this act or in revising minimum rates of wages so fixed, the appropriate government shall either-(a) appoint as many committees and sub-committees as it considers necessary to hold enquiries and advise it in respect of such fixation or revision, as i he case may be, or ..... the recommendations made by the committee which were accepted by the government were those by a committe which was not constituted and did not function in accordance with section 9 of the act read with rule 12 of the minimum wages (tamil nadu) rules, 1953.7. ..... dated 17th january, 1972, the century flour ..... department, dated 15th july, 1972 was issued. .....

The Union of India (Uoi), Owning the Western Railway, Represented by I ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1975)1MLJ96

..... this appeal involves interpretation of the scope of jurisdiction of the railway rates tribunal under section 41(3) of the indian railways act, 1890. ..... the tribunal shall hear and decide any such complaint in accordance with the provisions contained in chapter v of the act. .....

S. Kuppuswami Chettiar, Proprietor, Krishnananda Rice Mill Vs. Smt. Ka ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ265

..... to the petitioner as the question is not whether petitioner's rights will or will not be affected but whether the necessary permits can be granted to the second respondent in accordance with the statutory provisions.the object of the act is not to give monopoly in rice mill trade to a few but to regulate the rice milling industry in the interests of the general public and the grant of a permit is made when in the opinion of the central government ..... the company, we are unable to decide whether the central government did not transgress the limits of their power.an inference may properly be made that if the records disclosed that the central government had acted within the restrictions and was alive to the materials it had to consider, the supreme court would not have interfered in the matter on the mere ground that the order itself did not contain reasons ..... of the counter-affidavit makes out that all the requirements of the rice milling industry (regulation) act and the rules thereunder have been borne in mind when ordering the grant. ..... could not point out any particular instruction which would affect a quasi-judicial determination in accordance with the provisions of the act and rules in an unwarranted or illegal manner so as to vitiate it. ..... the outset, the record in the present case amply bears out that every requirement for the grant of a permit as contemplated and provided for under the act and rules has been observed. ..... the rules made under the act bring out more clearly the object .....

Sri Ram and Company (Lessee of Sri Rama Rice Mill) and ors. Vs. the St ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1979)2MLJ67

..... given to the government that the government are not bound to accept the advice and that consequently any contravention of section 9 in the constitution of the committee or any irregularity in the functioning of the committee contrary to rule 12 of the minimum wages (tamil nadu) rules referred to already will not in any way vitiate the ultimate notification issued by the government either fixing the minimum wages or revising the minimum wages already fixed ..... name who was a member of the committee and that therefore, in his place the century flour mills had to substitute another person, but that misapprehension cannot obliterate the act that one of the representatives of the employers was not given the opportunity to participate in the meetings of the committee subsequent to 31st may, 1975 ..... madras represented by commissioner of labour and director, national employment organisation : (1963)illj29mad , have taken the view that the contravention of section 9 of the act will vitiate the ultimate notification issued by the government under section 5, but that there is a direct decision of the kerala high court in p ..... is that the recommendations made by the committee which were accepted by the government were those by a committee which was not constituted and did not function in accordance with section 9 of the act read with rule 12 of the minimum wages (tamil nadu) rules, 1953.7 ..... letter dated 17th january, 1972, the century flour mills ltd ..... and employment department, dated 15th july, 1972 was issued. .....

Special Officer, Karimangalam Milk Producers Co-operative Society Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ568Mad

..... the petitioner after taking through the claim petition filed by the second respondent, the defence taken by the authority and also the relevant provisions of the tamil nadu co-operative societies act and rules contended that in the light of the specific provisions in the co- operative societies act and the directions/circulars of the registrar of co-operative societies, the impugned order of the first respondent based on the minimum wages fixed by the government as per g.o. ms. no. ..... on the other hand, it is demonstrated before me that the petitioner's society is covered by the tamil naduco-operative societies act and rules and the society collects milk from the members and the society is working only four hours and the employees are also working elsewhere to earn their livelihood. ..... 89) that the service conditions relating to employees of co-operative societies as set out under the co-operative societies act, the rules the bye-laws are special laws made with the competence of the state legislature and are binding on the employees 6. ..... hence, the society cannot appoint more persons than what the registrar stipulates and the recruitment will have to be done on the basis of the rules of tamil nadu government or the circulars issued by the registrar of co-operative societies. ..... it is also the specific case of the petitioner that the employees of the co- operative societies are covered and controlled by the rules/notifications/circulars issued by the registrar of co- operative societies. .....

Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Investment Trust of India Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2007)288ITR106(Chennai)

..... appellate authority, the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee.the only objection of the revenue is that the first appellate authority admitted the additional evidence in violation of rule 46a of the income-tax rules, 1962, we find that the first appellate authority, after verifying the details filed by the assessee, allowed the claim of the assessee with regard to research fee expenses. ..... (2) when the sale of the boiler was subjected to sales tax and it was treated as sale of goods under the sales tax act, can the sale of the said boiler be doubted in the income-tax proceeding especially when the juris-dictional high court in the case ..... assessing officer allowed the claim of the assessee in the assessment order made under section 143(3) of the income-tax act, 1961.however, the commissioner of income-tax by exercising his power under section 263 of the income-tax act, set aside the order of the assessment on the ground that it is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of ..... (2) when the sale of boiler was subjected to sales tax and it was treated as sale of goods under the sales tax act, can the sale of the said boiler be doubted in the income-tax proceeding especially when the jurisdictional high court in the case ..... therefore, the sale of such boiler cannot be construed as sale of goods under the sale of goods act, 1930.therefore, the assessing officer concluded that the transaction is only a financial transaction and the assessee is not entitled .....