Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motor transport workers act 1961 chapter i preliminary Page 5 of about 4,070 results (0.173 seconds)

Aug 21 2008 (SC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Narela, Delhi Vs. Commissioner ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)433; [2008]305ITR1(SC); JT2008(10)SC17; 2008(11)SCALE540; (2008)9SCC434; 2008AIRSCW6285; 2008(6)Supreme520; 2008(11)SCALE540

..... connected with providing amenities to the inhabitants of the locality, like health and education services, water and sewerage, town planning and development, roads, markets, transportation, social welfare services etc. etc. broadly we may say that they may be entrusted with the performance of civic duties and functions which would otherwise be ..... is : whether agricultural market committee ('amc', for short) is a 'local authority' under the explanation to section 10(20) of the income-tax act, 1961 ('1961 act', for short).3. for the sake of convenience we refer to the facts mentioned in civil appeal no. 8180 of 2008 (arising out of s. ..... counsel appearing for the department, has adopted the arguments of the learned addl. solicitor general. learned counsel submitted that earlier in 1897 when general clauses act stood enacted there were district boards and municipal committees in certain areas. those district boards, according to learned counsel, were different from the municipalities. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1973 (SC)

State of Punjab Vs. the Gandhara Transport Company (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC531; 1975LabIC358; (1975)4SCC838; [1974]1SCR98

..... dismissed three of its workmen between the 15th december, 1959 and 6th january, 1960 and it also retrenched another employee on the 7th february 1960. the district motor transport workers' union appears to have raised a dispute with the management on the 17th november, 1960 and demanded the reinstatement of the dismissed workmen as well as the payment ..... namely, that the dispute that has been referred by the state government for adjudication is not an industrial dispute under section 2(k) of the industrial disputes act inasmuch as the cause of the workman had not been espoused by a substantial body of the workmen of the company. the labour court accepted the plea of ..... division bench is erroneous. in support of his contention, the learned counsel referred to us the decision of this court in workmen of rohtak general transport company v. rohtak general transport company [1962] 1 llj 634. he pointed out that the facts in that case show that though only five out of twenty-two workmen espoused .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 24 1994 (SC)

Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui Etc, Mohd. Aslam, Hargyan Singh, Thakur Vijay Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC605A

..... injustice done to the muslim community by demolition of the mosque on 6th december, 1992 and, therefore, it amounts to an anti-secular or discriminatory act rendering the provision unconstitutional. for this purpose it is necessary to recall the situation as it existed on 7th january, 1993 along with the significant ..... visibility are apparent from fundamental rights and directive principles and their related provisions. it was made explicit by amending the preamble of the constitution 42nd amendment act. the concept of secularism of which religious freedom is the foremost appears to visualise not only of the subject of god but also an understanding between ..... 1994 as under:-government stands by the policy of secularism and of even-handed treatment of all religious communities. the acquisition of certain area at ayodhya act, 1993, as well as the presidential reference, have the objective of maintaining public order and promoting communal harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1986 (HC)

Ramjidas Vs. Laxmi Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1987MP78

..... was liable to be rejected and only symbolical possession could be ordered. much argument has, however, been advanced on the prohibition contained in section 52 of the t.p. act, as earlier alluded, to submit of course that the other co-sharers (radha kishan and jethmal) having lost all authority to deal with the property after 11-2-1965 ..... of the court. the fault evidently was not of the revisionist and he would not be, therefore, debarred in this court to rely on the provisions of m.p. act, 1961. indeed, the moot point for decision by the executing court was to decide whether the concerned premises was in occupation of the revisionist as a 'tenant' and, ..... any person occupying the accommodation as a sub-tenant and also any person continuing in possession after the termination of his tenancy whether before or after the commencement of this act; but shall not include any person against whom any order or decree for eviction has been made.' 14. the concept of a 'statutory tenant' is brought out .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2001 (HC)

Modern Syntax (i) Ltd. Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal Jaipur and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2001Raj170; [2001]106CompCas629(Raj); 2001(2)WLC79; 2003(1)WLN620

..... introduced by amendment in the concurrent list. at this stage, the argument of shri garg is that looked from that point of view both the acts, namely, rdb act and rru act would be deemed to have been enacted under the concurrent list. entries 22, 23, 24 and 33-a of the list iii of 7th schedule ..... relief undertakings (special provisions) act, 1961 (rru act).(15). supporting the plea raised in the writ petition, shri paras kuhad submitted that a bare perusal of the notifications issued by the stale government brings ..... ground of above set of facts, the short point involved in this petition is whether proceedings under recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 (rdb act) would lie against an industrial undertaking and its owner company once that undertaking has been declared to be a 'relief undertaking'within the meaning of rajasthan .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1962 (HC)

Prafulla Kumar Sen Vs. Calcutta State Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1963Cal116,67CWN361,[1962(5)FLR57]

..... an officer subordinate to chairman and as such the dismisal order was baa. this argument ignores the provisions of sections 14 and 15 of the road transport corporation act 1950, which i set out below:'14. officers and servants of the corporation (1) every corporation shall have a chief executive officer or general ..... corporation could not penalise the petitioner for misconduct not committed against itself. mr. hazra emphasised on section 47b(1)(c) of the road transport corporation (west bengal amendment) act 1959 and contended the corporation could continue suits and other legal proceedings instituted by or against the state government but not disciplinary proceedings. i ..... remain, in spite of the administrative control exercised by the state government.27. mr. hazra next invited my attention to section 47b of the road transport corporation (west bengal amendment) act 1959 and particularly to sub-section (1) clauses (f) ant) (h) thereof which read as follows:'(f) persons employed by the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1979 (HC)

Management of Pudukottah Textile Limited Vs. A. Ganapathi, Etc., Etc.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1979)IILLJ343Mad

..... enactment had been followed. in this context, provisions made under section 27 of the maternity benefits act, section 14 of the gratuity act, section 25 of the minimum wages act, section 40 of the beedi & cigar workers (conditions of employment) act, section 27 of motor transport workers act and section 79 of factories act, are referred to by mr. prasad, learned counsel for the workmen. he relies upon section 25j ..... of the industrial disputes act to contend that benefits conferred under chapter v-a cannot be taken away .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2014 (HC)

Bangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

..... matter of icds vs. cit reported in (2013) 350 itr527(sc) wherein it has been held that provisions involved in the case of motor vehicle act is different and same cannot be imported under the income tax act. 6.4. he also draws the attention of the court to section 194b which does not mention about the word horse races since ..... where the weaker sections of the community are concerned, such as under-trial prisoners languishing in jails without a trial, inmates of the protective home in agra or harijan workers engaged in road construction in the district of ajmer, who are living in poverty and destitution, who are barely a miserable existence with their sweat and toil, who are ..... paid to the winner/s was not being taxed. as such, explanation (i) and (ii) also came to be inserted to section 2 (24) (ix) of the act by finance act, 2001 with effect from 01.06.2001 which 123 undisputedly is an inclusive definition. the relevant portion of the budget speech rendered by the finance minister is as under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2013 (HC)

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and miscellaneous provisions act 25. notaries act 26. delivery of books and newspapers (public libraries) act 27. essential commodities act 28. companies act 29. newspaper (price and page) act 30. securities contracts (regulation) act 31. mines and minerals (development and regulation) act 32. delhi rent control act 33. children act 34. geneva conventions act 35. apprentices act 36. deposit insurance and credit guarantee corporation act 37. motor transport workers act 38. customs act 39. the warehousing ..... corporations act 40. the unit trust of india act 41. the food .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1984 (HC)

Bhanwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ111Raj

..... a lien on a permanent post or would hold a lien on a permanent post, had the lien not been suspended. clause 7 of the standing orders prescribes that motor transport workers would be classified in four categories, viz., (i) probationer, (ii) permanent, (iii) temporary, and (iv) apprentice. the period of 'probationer' prescribed ..... , j.,) in this reference to the full bench are mentioned hereunder:(1) whether section 25j of the industrial disputes act, 1947 permits the application of clause 13 of the rajasthan state road transport workers and workshop employees standing orders, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the standing orders), without complying with the provisions of sections ..... concerned. it is true that the standing orders may have been framed by a private industrial establishment which comes within 1 the purview of the act. but the act provides for the conditions of service of employees of such establishment, which were previously left to the agreement of the parties, to be brought .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //