Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motor transport workers act 1961 chapter i preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 20 of about 505 results (0.195 seconds)

Tobacco Manufacturers (India) Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Sales-tax, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC402; [1961]2SCR106; [1961]12STC87(SC)

..... they how find themselves without such an order by the high court. 14. the next question for consideration is whether on a proper construction of the decision in the united motors case : [1953]4scr1069 the exclusion of type (b) sales from those exempted under art. 286(1) was erroneous. mr. chatterjee, learned counsel for the appellants sought ..... for the appellants strongly pressed before us that the member of the board having accepted the preliminary objection that there was no provision in the bihar sales-tax act by which a party concerned might move the board to clarify or explain the order, he had no jurisdiction to effect any clarification of his previous order and ..... was overruled, the reason assigned being, that the sales were completed in bihar, and that the entire turnover of the appellants was therefore subjected to tax under the act. in taking this view the assessing authority followed a previous ruling of the board of revenue of the state in the bengal timber case (case 61 of 1952). .....

In Re: Smt. Sayalee Sanjeev Joshi, Member, Maharashtra Public Service ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC2809; 2007(7)SCALE631

..... dignitaries, though their names were mentioned in the application. they had made the complaint application only to the chairman of the commission. mr. wani was the acting chairman then. it was true that in response to her complaint a communication was received from the secretary of the commission mrs. seema dhamdhere. that communication ..... 466, 467, 468, 471, 477(a), 380, 381, 457 read with 120(b) of indian penal code read with 13(1)(d) of prevention of corruption act, 1988 and commenced investigation. he first arrested sarode, the controller of examinations and subsequently arrested the others. till date, 29 persons were arrested. the investigation is continuing with ..... such illegal actions in the future in conjunction with one mr. nitin sathe.charge - 2whereas the respondent no. 3, ms. sayalee joshi committed an act of misbehavior by interfering with an internal inquiry being conducted by the secretary of mpsc regarding alleged malpractices in the examination for psi/asstt/sti conducted by .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Shanti Devi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC1190; 1983(2)SCALE1020; (1983)4SCC542; 1987(Supp)SCC433; [1984]1SCR217

..... works on the project. the expenditure on the project was shared by the rajasthan government.3. with the coming into force of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 (act 31 of 1966), the new state of haryana and the union territory of chandigarh came into being, having been formed out o f the territory ..... in tikka bhararian, mauza dhameta, tehril dehra, district kangra. himachal pradesh. the land acquisition officer issued notices under section 9(3) of the land acquisition act to the interested persons inviting their representations and objections with regard to the determination and payment of the compensation. after receiving the representations and objections, the land ..... the beas construction board. for the discharge of its functions, sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 80 of the punjab reorganistation act empowered the central government in consultation with the governments of the successor states and the state of rajasthan to constitute a board to be called the beas .....

K.V. Narayanaswami Iyer Vs. K.V. Ramakrishna Iyer and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC289; [1964]7SCR490

..... the karta of the family. when the father died the family was possessed of about 10 acres of land. but he had left some debts and one of the first acts which ramakrishna had to do as the manager was the repayment of those debts. ramakrishna had become the karnam in narasingampettai in 1902 and even during his father's life .....

The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi Vs. Employees of the Bharat Bank Ltd., Del ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC188; (1950)NULLLLJ921SC; (1950)ILLJ921SC; [1950]1SCR459

..... the power authorizing it is judicial. there we get a modern use of the term 'judicial power'.' this statement of the characteristics of judicial power looks to what, in waterside workers' federation of australia v. gilchrist, watt & sanderson ltd. 34 c.l.r. 482, 512, isaacs and rich jj. referred to as the creation of instant liability in ..... be held to be a safe guide in the interpretation of language employed in a constitution differently drafted. 44. the first of these cases is waterside workers' federation of australia v. j.w. alexander ltd. 25 c.l.r. 434. therein it was held that the power conferred by the commonwealth conciliation and arbitration ..... -general. in this case he said the commissioners come to no decision at all. they act merely as advisers. they recommend an order embodying a scheme to the minister of transport, who may confirm it with or without modifications. similarly the minister of transport comes to no decision. he submits the order to the houses of parliament, who may .....

Dabur (Dr. S.K. Burman) Private Ltd. Deoghar, Bihar Vs. the Workmen

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC17; 1968(16)BLJR592; [1968(16)FLR36]; (1967)IILLJ863SC; [1968]1SCR61

..... before us. one was that the labour court committed a manifest error of law apparent on the face of the record in holding that the workmen concerned were not casual workers. the judgment of the high court, however, shows that before that court it was nowhere urged or argued that any such error of law apparent on the face of ..... patna. on the first issue referred, the court recorded the finding that the 40 workmen, who had been discharged, were not casual workers and that their discharge by the employers on the basis that they were casual workers was not proper. it was further held that the discharge was mala fide inasmuch as the purpose of the discharge was to avoid ..... bhargava, j.1. the government of bihar, by an order dated 14th june, 1961, referred an industrial dispute under section 10(1) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947) to the labour court, patna, wherein the following two issues were referred :- '(1) whether the discharge of the following forty workmen was proper if not, .....

In Re Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under The Arbitration A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , being separate and distinct from the underlying commercial contract, would not be rendered invalid, unenforceable, or non-existent. the court held that 1 arbitration act 2 stamp act 3 contract act 4 (2021) 4 scc3795 part a the non-payment of stamp-duty would not invalidate even the underlying contract because it is a curable defect. ..... best harmonized by giving effect to the special statute i.e. the arbitration act, vis- -vis the more general statute, namely, the commercial courts act, being left to operate in spheres other than arbitration.163. in silpi industries v. kerala state road transport corporation,153 the issue before this court was whether a counter-claim was maintainable ..... the effect of the word shall in sections 33 and 35 of the stamp act 189. sections 33 and 35 of the stamp act use the word shall. while this ordinarily indicates that the provision is mandatory, it may be read as directory. in sainik motors v. state of rajasthan,168 this court held: the word shall is .....

Itc Limited Gurgaon Vs. Commr. of I.T(Tds) Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of this court in karamchari union, agra v. union of india, (2000) 3 scc335 while distinguishing the judgments of this court in rambagh palace hotel v. rajasthan hotel workers' union, (1976) 4 scc817and quality inn southern star v. esi corpn., (2008) 2 scc549 after distinguishing the said judgments, the high court arrived at the following ..... waiters, and, in some cases, other members of the staff. this judgment arose under section 9(2) of the catering wages act, 1943 which provided that if an employer fails to pay to a worker, to whom a wages regulation order applies, remuneration not less than the statutory minimum remuneration (clear of all deductions), he shall ..... star v. esi corpn., (2008) 2 scc549 20. shri kaul sought to distinguish the aforesaid judgments as they arose in contexts that were outside the income tax act. for this, he relied upon jagatram ahuja v. commissioner of gift tax, hyderabad, (2000) 8 scc249at paragraph 23, for the proposition that words judicially construed in .....

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 11 (1) Bangalore Vs. M/S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... walls but does not include the common areas shared with other residential units; (aa) "cold chain facility" means a chain of facilities for storage or transportation of agricultural produce under scientifically controlled conditions including refrigeration and other facilities necessary for the preservation of such produce; 6 (ab) "convention centre" means a ..... of machinery or plant previously used. certain other qualifications have to continue to exist for claiming the incentive such as employment of particular number of workers as per sub-clause 4(i) of clause 2 in an 16 assessment year. for industrial undertakings other than small scale industrial undertakings, not manufacturing ..... of income tax, interfered with the assessment under section 263 to the extent it allowed deduction under section 80 ib(3) of the income tax act, 1961 (the act) and directed fresh decision on the said issue vide order dated 16th january, 2009. thereafter, the assessing authority on 14th december, 2009 disallowed .....

New Motor Vehicle Bd. Vs. OrrIn W. Fox Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to suits under the federal antitrust laws. see california motor transport co. v. trucking unlimited, 404 u. s. 508 (1972). mr. justice marshall, concurring. although i join the opinion of the court, i write separately to emphasize why, in my view, the california automobile franchise act is not violative of the due process clause. as ..... the form of a board determination that there is good cause for not permitting a proposed dealership do not violate the sherman act, eastern railroad presidents conference v. noerr motor freight, inc., 365 u. s. 127 (1961), and mine workers v. pennington, 381 u. s. 657 , 381 u. s. 670 (1965). [ footnote 15 ] appellees ..... also argue conflict with the sherman act because the automobile franchise act permits auto dealers to invoke state power for the purpose of restraining intrabrand .....