Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motor transport workers act 1961 chapter i preliminary Court: punjab and haryana Page 7 of about 79 results (0.157 seconds)

Shanker Iron and Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H50

..... protect their very existence in the trade and to enable them to stand in competition with large units and as a result to protect the interest of the workers in those small units who it was apprehended would have been thrown out of employment in case the imposition f duty in question was insisted upon.the exemption ..... word 'person' in the second proviso includes a transferee of the original manufacturer. even otherwise, there is no force in the said contention. section 3 of the act provides that there shall be levied and collected in such manner as maybe prescribed duties of excise on all excisable goods (subject to certain exceptions) which are produced or ..... understandable classification with a view to save newly started establishments from the additional burden of making contribution to provident fund in respect of its employees under the employees' provident funds act , 1952. in orient weaving mills (p) ltd. v. union of india, air 1963 sc 98, sinha, c.j. (as he then was), who wrote the .....

Cit Vs. Mahavir Spinning Mills Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)213CTR(P& H)457; [2007]293ITR492(P& H)

..... of the assessee)whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the hon'ble tribunal was justified in not allowing initial depreciation on rs. 19,781 spent for workers' toilets ?whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the hon'ble tribunal was justified in not treating the pre-operative expenses as a part of the ..... into account for calculating profits and gains for the purposes of section 80hh of the act.4. the assessing officer rejected the claim of the assessee for depreciation on amount of rs. 19,781 spent on workers' toilets under section 32(l)(iv) of the act, which view was upheld by the commissioner (appeals) as well as the tribunal.5 ..... . the assessee claimed relief under section 80j of the act on the value of work-in-progress and preuminary expenses. the assessing officer .....

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1965CriLJ119

..... on in re devata lakshminarayana : air1950mad266 . in that case the detenu had been arrested for having committed an offence punishable under the explosive substances act, 1908, by transporting certain explosive substances from bezwada to jeggayyapet, but instead of being brought to trial for this offence an order of detention under the madras maintenance ..... grounds:with the financial help given by the portuguese authorities you are carrying on espionage on behalf of the portuguese government with the help of underground workers. you are also collecting intelligence about the security arrangements on the border area and you make such intelligence available to the portuguese authorities, these activities ..... was headed as 'grounds for detention under clause (ii) of clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the preventive detention act, 1950 (act iv of 1950)'. it was further mentioned that the detenu was being detained in pursuance of a detention order made in exercise of the power conferred .....

Kundan Iron and Steel Industries Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1961)IILLJ599P& H

..... on the following allegations:2. the petitioner-establishment is alleged to be a small concern having eighteen to twenty employees, in which respondents 3 to 6 were workers performing various duties allotted to them. on account of decrease in work and depression, there was no work left for these employees, with the result that respondent ..... through the amritsar general labour union, putlighar, amritsar, respondent 7, which was referred by the punjab government under section 10(1)(c) of the industrial disputes act in the following terms:--whether the action of the management in laying off the following workmen from the dates mentioned against each was bona fide and is in ..... interpretation, consistent with their spirit and reason, would, in my view, be justified and the labour court in the instant case cannot be considered to have acted either without jurisdiction or outside the statute by merely obtaining some guidance from sections 25c to 25e for determining what in its view would be the just .....

Atlas Cycle Industries, Limited Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1962)ILLJ534P& H

..... for decision to the industrial tribunal, punjab, jullunder, constituted under section 7 of the aforesaid act before its last amendment in 1958. the said reference was numbered as reference 3 of 1955 and, while it was still pending, one worker, tej bhan; who is respondent 3 in the present petition; was retrenched as being a surplus ..... band. he made a complaint to the industrial tribunal under section 33a of the said act in. which he, inter alia, contended that be had been wrongfully ..... , punjab, jullunder, to clarify whether the words 'without any change in the conditions of service' occurring in the award permit change in the emoluments of the worker by the management of atlas cycle industries, limited, sonepat, consequent upon his reinstatement.the employers filed a representation to the government pointing out that a truncated part of .....

M/s. Bellsonica Auto Component India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... v. presiding officer, industrial tribunal and another; 2014 (1) lln 776 (orissa), jarnail singh v. presiding officer, labour court, patiala and another; 2007 llr 245, delhi transport corporation v. nihal singh; 2010 llr 909 and lalla ram v. management of dcm chemical works; (1978) 3 scc 1. 8. various facets of the approval proceedings ..... 20, 2014. the conciliation proceedings and the civil suit ran parallel during the relevant period. it is urged that when the suit was brought by 45 workers including the present respondent, they were aware of the charge-sheet dated october 17, 2014 having been issued against them, a copy of which had been even ..... , gurgaon on november 10, 2015 whereby the application moved on behalf of the petitioner management under section 33 (2) (b) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (the 'act') has been rejected and consequently the application for approval of the order dismissing respondent no.5-workman from service passed vide impugned order dated february 16, 2015 .....

Gopal Karamchari Union Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1968)ILLJ737P& H

..... filed, this also was being filed. on 23 june 1964, the petitioner served a comprehensive demand notice asking for the reinstatement of all the dismissed workers including those dismissed before hungerstrike. in connexion with this demand notice, sri m.k. jain, conciliation officer, wrote a letter dated 3 july 1964 ..... 1964. these signatures or thumb-impressions were obtained in december 1963, as the dates under the signatures showed. it was denied that the conciliation officer acted without juresdiction or with ulterior motive in not initiating the conciliation proceedings. ha was not competent to undertake conciliation, if the pre-condition that an ..... the industrial dispute. during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings, the management continued the policy of victimization, contravening the provisions of section 33 of the act. it dismissed joginder singh, joint secretary of the union and some others. the management also mala fide transferred hari krishan, senior vice-president of the .....

Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1967)IILLJ215P& H

..... further observed that the enquiry officer, by not confronting witnesses with their previous statements, had not performed his duty fairly and impartially, more so when the worker was not helped by any legal and experienced man. the third circumstance, which weighed with the labour court, was that raman lal was not supplied with the ..... 15. submission has also been made on behalf of respondent 2 that the petitioner has filed a fresh application under section 33(2) of the industrial disputes act before the industrial tribunal on 22 juno 1965, during the pendency of the present petition. it is contended that the present petition has consequently become infructuous. ..... the time the order for dismissal was made, an application was filed before the industrial tribunal, delhi, under section 33(2)(b) of the industrial disputes act for the approval of the action taken by the petitioner-company. this application was subsequently transferred for decision to the labour court. before the labour court, the .....

S.K. Jaganani Vs. the State Through the Chief Inspector of Factories

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1964CriLJ697

..... preliminary cdjsction that only one complaint could have been, loggia -against him in regard to the alleged contravention of the .-.provisions of -section 63 of the act because all the ten workers were found working during the rest interval in the automatic loom shed. the trial magistrate overused the preliminary objection and declined to consolidate the tour complaints. ..... was dismissed by the learned additional sessions judge, delhi. he has come up in revision to this court.3. sections 63 and 92 of the act run 25-63. no adult worker shall be required or allowed to work in any factory otherwise than in accordance with i the notice of periods of work for adults displayed in ..... the factory and the entries made before hand against his name jin the register of adult workers of the factory.92. save as is otherwise expressly provided in mis-act and subject to the provisions of section 93, if in, or in respect of, any factory there is any contravention of .....

Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1973)ILLJ182P& H

..... in amin chand pyare lal v. second punjab industrial tribunal 1958- i l.lj. 604 : [1957] 12 fj.r. 206. in december, 1955, the workers made certain demands to the management regarding their terms of employment and conditions of labour. ultimately, a settlement was arrived at on 14th march, 1956, in the presence ..... the bombay high court, a settlement had been arrived at on 11th april, 1955, between the management and the elected representatives of the workmen with regard to the workers' demands relating to wages, dearness allowance, leave facilities, etc. another union, poona mazdoor sabha, was formed on 1st april, 1955, and was registered on ..... 1956, the state government referred to the industrial tribunal inter alia the following question:whether the piece-rated workers in the establishments mentioned above should be treated as workmen, as denned in the industrial disputes act?after holding that the workmen were properly represented at the time of the settlement and that the settlement must .....