Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: motion of thanks Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 3,520 results (0.015 seconds)

K.B. Dani Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1979KAR2315; 1979(2)KarLJ286; [1979]44STC276(Kar)

..... reads : 'machine, engine, apparatus, appliance signify, in common, a device, often complex, for doing work beyond human hand or mind; machine applies to a construction or organisation whose parts are so connected and interrelated that it can be set in motion and perform work as a unit (those most practical machines of our modern life, the dynamo and the telephone - havelock ellis) (calculators, billers, duplicators, and other business machines) .......... .....

K.M. Ramakrishne Godwa Vs. Senior Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR3770

..... the other factor that weighed with this court was that removal from an office leads to very serious consequences and therefore the no-confidence motion could be moved and carried only by such total number as already fixed under section 5(1) of the act also cannot stand to any good reason because when a person can come to an office elected by a lesser number can it be ..... accordingly, the proportion of membership of the mandal panchayat required for the written notice of intention to make the motion of no-confidence againstt the pradhana or upapradhana of the mandal panchayat under sub-section (2) of section 47 of the act and for the purpose of determination of two-thirds of the total number of members under section 47(9) for the motion to be carried have reference to the total membership required for the constitution of the mandal panchayat under section 5 of the ..... the phrase 'total number of members of panchayat' was interpreted by this court, as the totality of members who would fill up all the seats and therefore, for purposes such as quorum or bringing no-confidence motion, the requisite percentage has to be calculated with reference to all the available seats for membership.8. ..... while dealing with this provision the assam high court observed that there is no warrant for adding a word 'existing' in section 27(1)(b) to qualify the words 'number of members' inasmuch as a no confidence motion will affect an office of a person and therefore the provisions have to be read strictly. .....

Moolchand Prakashchand and Others Vs. C.M. Singaraju

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR3360; 2000(5)KarLJ233

order1. this is a tenant's second revision filed under section 115 of the civil procedure code and is directed against the order dated 24-11-1998 in revision (rent) no. 2 of 1996 passed by the additional district judge, chickmagalur, dismissing the said first revision petition and further confirming the order of eviction passed by the principal munsiff and jmfc, chickmagalur as against him on 4-12-1995 in hrc no. 74 of 1990.2. the petitioners herein are represented by the senior counsel sri m.h. datar. the respondent-landlord is represented by sri s.d.n. prasad and sri yoganarasimha.3. before proceeding further, i feel it appropriate to set out in brief the facts of the case. they are as hereunder:4. the petitioner 1 was the partnership firm and it was the tenant of the respondent-landlord. petitioners 2 and 3 were the partners of the petitioner 1-firm.5. for the purpose of convenience, the petitioner 1 henceforth is referred to as the 'tenant' and whereas the respondent is referred to as the 'landlord'. that is how they were before the trial court, principal munsiff and jmfc, chickmagalur.6. that the landlord had filed an eviction petition under section 21(1)(h) of the karnataka rent control act seeking eviction of the tenant. the petition schedule premises was consisting of the front side -shop portion measuring 14' x 12' and a rear side, a residential portion situated in m.g. road, chickmagalur. the shop portion as well as the residential portion were facing m.g. road. .....

Sri. Manjunatha M. S. Vs. State By Arsikere Town Police

Court : Karnataka

..... thus, he submits that the entire criminal process, which has been set in motion by way of the complaint being registered by respondent no.2 complainant, under a wrong provision of law and obtaining the benefit thereof by way of search and seizure and subsequently substituting the provisions of sections 102, 103 and 104 of .....

Justice Subhash B. Adi Vs. The Secretary, Karnataka Legislative Assemb ...

Court : Karnataka

..... india and others [air 1992 sc 320] in order to plead that the proceeding for removal of a judge can be divided into two parts: the first part, according to him, deals with the notice of motion submitted by the legislature and extends to the point of reference made by the speaker to the hon'ble chief justice. ..... filed a transcript of the proceedings of the legislative assembly which had taken place on 27.11.2015 with regard to the motion moved by mr.tanwir set for removing the petitioner from the post of upa lokayukta. ..... subsequently when it was discovered that inadvertently, it was shown that "the motion was admitted", it was duly corrected; the corrected copy was uploaded on 21.12. ..... in this context that the majority in that decision took the view that the process was statutory till the parliament takes up the motion for consideration on a finding of 'guilty' being made by the inquiry committee in its report which is submitted to the parliament; and the ninth lok sabha having been dissolved before commencement of the parliamentary process, there was no question of the motion lapsing at that stage which was statutory. 9. ..... in the earlier decision was whether the entire process of removal of a judge in our constitutional scheme is parliamentary to attract the doctrine of lapse to the motion for removal of the learned judge on dissolution of the ninth lok sabha or a part thereof was statutory to which the doctrine of lapse of motions in the parliament could have not application. .....

State Of Karnataka Vs. Prasanna Kumar @ Anandakumar

Court : Karnataka

..... subsequently, she filed a complaint by approaching kyathsandra police station and based upon her complaint at ex.p1, criminal law was set into motion by recording fir as per ex.p14 which bears the signature of pw.15 ravikumar who is the police inspector. ..... but subsequent to registration of the crime, on filing of the 1 4 complaint by pw.1, criminal law was set into motion and then the investigating officer took up the case for investigation and laid the charge sheet against the accused for the offence punishable sections 498-a, 307 r/w 34 of ipc, besides sections 3 and 4 of the ..... in pursuance of the act of the accused, on filing of a complaint by the complainant, criminal law was set into motion by registering the case by recording fir at ex.p14 for the aforesaid offences. ..... but the criminal 3 9 law was set into motion by registering the case for the offences punishable under sections 498a, 307 r/w 34 of ipc and sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act, but the prosecution did not facilitate worthwhile evidence relating to physical as well as mental ..... but subsequent to setting the criminal law into motion for the offence under sections 498a, 307 r/w 34 of ipc relating to physical as well as mental harassment and so also, making an attempt to take away her life and so 3 3 also, insisting her to bring additional dowry. .....

Sri Krishna Murthy Vs. State By Karnataka Lokayukta Police

Court : Karnataka

..... . but the complaint was even reduced into writing and based upon the complaint at exhibit p2, criminal law was set into motion and thereafter, the i.o / pw-9 on completion of the investigation in entirety, laid the charge-sheet against the accused ..... . but criminal law was set into motion on receipt of a complaint at exhibit p2 and subsequent to registration of the crime by recording an fir at exhibit p6, pw-9 secured the panch witnesses pw-3 and pw-4 and in their presence, he drew the pre- trap mahazar as per exhibit p3 and thereafter, he drew the ..... . whereas in the instant case, criminal law was set into motion on receipt of a complaint at exhibit p2 made by pw-2 / kumar ..... . but criminal law was set into motion by recording an fir as per exhibit p6 ..... based upon his complaint criminal law was set into motion by recording the fir as per ex.p6. ..... . and gone into the office and given a complaint as per exhibit p2 and based upon his complaint, criminal law was set into motion by recording an fir ..... . has been subjected to examination on the part of the prosecution wherein he on receipt of a complaint at exhibit p2 and based upon the complaint made by pw-2, criminal law was set into motion .....

Smt. Sujaya Ramappa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR2894

..... nagarajappa, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that under section 141(2)(a) of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993(for short the act), the adhyaksha is required to call for the meeting on any motion signed by 1/3rd of the total number of members of the panchayat within 15 days from the date of receipt of such request. ..... admittedly, the request of 1/3rd members of the taluk panchayat to call a special meeting to consider the motion of no confidence was received in the office of the adhyaksha on 31.3.2003. ..... this decision of the taluk panchayat on the motion of no confidence moved against the petitioner has been questioned by the petitioner in this petition.2. ..... the petitioner is the adhyaksha of the 2nd respondent taluk panchayat 1/3rd of the total number of members of the taluk panchayat gave a notice to the adhyaksha expressing their intention to move the motion of no confidence as against the petitioner. ..... on 16.4.2003, the motion was passed by majority. ..... the motion of no confidence is required to be considered by calling for special meeting sections 141(2)(a) of the act, reads as follows:-'141(2)(a): the adhyaksha may, whenever he thinks fit, and shall, upon the written request of not less than one- ..... on receipt of the said notice, the petitioner has not taken any steps to call for the special meeting to consider the motion of no confidence. .....

Ashok Vs. Pandurang and Others

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... if these things are kept in mind while interpreting the provisions of section 136(3) of the act, it would be amply clear that the deputy commissioner may on his own motion or on an application of a party, call for and examine any records not only made under sections 127 and 129 but also under section 136(2) of the act and pass such orders as he may deem fit. ..... the deputy commissioner under sec.136 (3) of the act may on his own motion or on application of the party, call for and examine any records made under secs.127 and 129 and pass such orders as he may deem fit. ..... (3) the deputy commissioner may, on his own motion or on application of a party, call for and examine any records made under section 127 and section 129 and pass such orders as he may deem fit: provided that no order shall be passed except after hearing ..... (3) the deputy commissioner may, on his own motion or on application of a party, call for and examine any records made under section 127 and section 129 and pass such orders as he may deem fit: provided that no order shall be passed except after hearing .....

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Vs. M/s Shamanur Sugars Limit ...

Court : Karnataka

..... tribunal may, for the purpose of examining the legality, propriety or correctness of any order made by the adjudicating officer or the appropriate commission under this act, as the case may be, in relation to any proceeding, on its own motion or otherwise, call for the records of such proceedings and make such order in the case as it thinks fit.-. .....