Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mogul line limited acquisition of shares act 1984 Page 8 of about 1,702 results (0.100 seconds)

J Venkatesh Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the most important aspect of acquisition of lands under the central act is the limits of acquisitions of irrigated multi- cropped land. ..... land acquisition process under act no.1 of 1984 shall be deemed to have lapsed in certain cases. ..... the scope, purpose and object of the provisions in the new act including section 24(2), if carefully considered, it cannot be equated to or restricted for the scope and object of section 11a introduced by the amending act, act 68/1984. ..... it is however stated that the kiadb in terms of a board resolution has resolved that insofar as acquisition initiated after 139 01.01.2014, the provisions as regards the determination of compensation contained in the 2013 act will be made applicable, in line with the view expressed in hanuman morbaji gudadhe and others vs. ..... the government order states in the preamble that government of india (goi) announced the national manufacturing policy (nmp) 2011, with the main objectives of enhancing the share of manufacturing in gdp to 25% within a decade and creating 100 million jobs. ..... bangalore development authority, (2011)3 scc139 the supreme court, when confronted with the question of whether section 11a of the 1894 act (introduced by an amendment in 1984) would automatically apply to land acquisitions under the bangalore development authority act, had held section 36 therein (a provision akin to section 30 of the kiad act ) to be a case of "legislation by incorporation". .....

Eacom's Controls (India) Limited Vs. Bailey Controls Company and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1998Delhi365; 74(1998)DLT213; ILR1998Delhi392

..... one of the aforementioned letters of the petitioner dated july 10, 1992 clearly establishes that the petitioner was aware of the fact that in the event of the failure of the respondent to pay its share of the advance on costs on the principal claim, the petitioner's liability would increase which would require a fresh foreign exchange permit from the reserve bank of india. ..... 1, 1986 july 1, 1986 january 1, 1987and for the licensed products and systems as set forth on exhibit g, the petitioner was required to pay to the first respondent a sum of us $ 2,000,000 according to the following schedule: january 1, 1984 - $125,000.00 july 1, 1984 - $125,000.00 january 1, 1985 - $275,000.00 july 1,1985 - $275,000.00 january 1, 1986 - $400,000.00 july 1, 1986 - $400,000.00 january 1, 1987 - $400,000.003. ..... the upshot of the above said decisions is that the court can relieve a contracting party from the obligations of a contract under section 56 of the contract act only by reason of a supervening event or untoward happening beyond the control of the parties which renders the contract impossible of performance after the same was made. ..... the supreme court also approved the view expressed in joseph constantine steamship line limited v. ..... vam could compensate eacom' for land and building premium, and out of pocket expenses spent in connection with acquisition of industrial license, on an equitable and verifiable basis to the extent of their participation as an indian promoter. 3. .....

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. Super Cassette Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(4)ALD47(SC); 2008(5)BomCR719; JT2008(7)SC11; LC2008(2)129; 2008(37)PTC353(SC); 2008(9)SCALE69; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)Supreme98; 2008(11)SCALE170; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638; 2008AIRSCW6698; 2008(4)LH(SC)2638

..... society while granting licence so as to enable all players to have the benefit of a single window; as such a society is entitled to:(i) issue licences under section 30 in respect of any rights under this act; (ii) collect fees in pursuance of such licences; (iii) distribute such fees among owners of rights after making deductions for its own expenses;(iv) perform any other functions consistent with the provisions of section 35.33. ..... to as 'the applicant') formed for the purpose of carrying on the business of issuing or granting licences in respect of any class of works in which copyright subsists or in respect of any other right conferred by the act may file with the registrar of copyrights an application in form ii-c for submission to the central government for grant of permission to carry on such business and for its registration as a copyright society. ..... music companies engaged in the production and/or acquisition of rights in sound recordings. ..... australia, england or singapore have a limited jurisdiction and its principal functions are:(a) to decide whether a work has been published or as to the date on which the work was published for the purpose of determining the term of copyright under chapter v of the act. ..... agreement between these parties, lay down the conditions as to the sharing of this remuneration.general principles39. ..... pandey : 1984(2)ecc142 , this court held:an artistic, literary or musical work is the brain-child of an author, the fruit of his labour ..... [1984]1scr594 .....

Vidya Charan Shukla Vs. Tamil Nadu Olympic Association and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad323; 1991CriLJ2722

..... the rules of proof beyond, reasonable doubt and such other rules of procedure in a contempt proceeding only to emphasise that as courts of law and courts of record, they must act fairly and give full opportunity to the contemner, who may not] establish his innocence but show that the allegations levelled against him are not free from doubt. ..... a case in which a certain undertaking to use best endeavours to obtain quotation for and permission to deal in shares and issue the same on bahalf of the company, was an issue, but shareholders were charged for contempt. ..... : 'it is impossible to hold that in a matter which is governed by an act, which in some limited respects gives the court a statutory discretion, there can be implied in court, outside the limits of the act a general discretion to dispense with the provisions of the act. ..... 1897) 1 ch 545 (supra) on aiding and abetting the breach of injunction and some other cases were referred to by the learned judge but said, 'we have had our attention drawn to a phrase, six lines in an old note under the heading 'rules of court' in butler's case (1696) 2 salk 596. ..... at least one exception appears from a case of my own at first instance, in re x (a minor) (wardship: injunction) (1984) 1 wlr 1422. ..... same time appreciating that i have to consider whether it is a very material fact, one which made any real difference.this brings me to the very interesting and, as 1 think, crucial decision is in re x (a minor) (wardship : injunction) (1984) i wlr 1422. .....

Ramvilas Bajaj Vs. Ashok Kumar and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD137; 2007(4)ALT348; AIR2007NOC2064(FB)(AP)

..... : air1995sc1012 , while considering the effect of the amendment made to the land acquisition act 1894 by introducing section 23(1)(a) by the land acquisition (amendment) act 1984 on the cases which were pending reference before the reference court as on the date of commencement of the amendment act, held:a statute is regarded as retrospective if it operates on cases or facts coming into existence before its commencement in the sense that it affects, even if for the future only, the character or consequence of transactions previously entered into ..... the statute explicitly show that, subject to the extraordinary powers of the high court and this court, such jurisdiction is impliedly barred, except to the limited extent specially provided by the statute..at the time of the institution of the suit, the building in question did not come within the ambit of the act, owing to the exclusionary provision contained in clause (ii) of section 30, but after leave to appeal was granted by this court, the applicability of the ..... when one of the co-sharers sold his share to third parties, the other co-sharers filed suit before the civil court concerned by claiming right of pre-emption under the said ..... to decide therefore, on which side of the line a case falls, the broad resemblance to another case is not at all decisive.x x xprecedent should be followed only so far as it marks the path of justice, but you must cut the dead wood and trim ..... there is a line, though thin, which separates adjudication .....

United Receland Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)114PLR227

..... state held that the taxable event was the purchase of goods and section 9 was valid yet the supreme court of indian in the casegood year india limited, faridabad has held, inter alia that the taxable event is the despatch of goods and not the purchase of goods and the state is not legislatively competent to enact such ..... to a place outside the state in any manner otherwise than by way of sale on the inter-state trade or in the course of export outside the territory of india within the meaning of section 5 of the central sales tax act, 1956;(c) purchases goods, other than those specified in schedule b, from any source in the state and exports them,in the circumstances in which no tax is payable under any other provision of this ..... land acquisition officer, ( : [1984]2scr900 ), the supreme court again referred to the case of cassell and co ..... the limited challenge mounted against the validating act was that the provisions contained in section 23(b) thereof which provided that any proceedings commenced or purported to have been commenced for the assessment, collection and recovery of any amount as tax or penalty under the provisions of the earlier act which had been declared as unconstitutional or the rules made there under during the period from april 1, 1950 to july 31, 1961 ..... the statute has specifically dealt with the exemption, no one can be permitted to stretch the language of a section which may amount to doing violence to it by reading it in between the lines to infer exemption. .....

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

..... and irreparable injury resulting to it was pleaded on the ground that a number of steps had already been taken including obtaining permission from the foreign investment promotion board for acquisition of the shares and if the restraint order was issued, the effect would be that the entire agreement between bocl and messer would fall through and this would amount to interference with the ..... undertaken similar business is clear, unequivocal and absolute without even requiring an element of competition between the joint venture or the other project.interestingly, clause 6.5 dealing with the transfer of the shareholding prohibits sale of shares to a transferee which is engaged in ``competing'` business with the company.in the instant case, there is no dispute that the proposed wholly owned subsidiary is to manufacture float glass as well as other ..... agreement is specifically enforceable under section 10 of the specific relief act, 1963 inasmuch as the shares in a private limited company would come within the phrase 'not obtainable in the market' as specified in the explanationn to section 10.it was further held in para 142 that, while it is imperative that the company should be a party to any agreement relating to the allotment of new shares, before such an agreement can be enforced it is not ..... to develop not only the second line but also the same product ..... 1984 ..... 1984 ..... . 1984) (breach of exclusive distribution agreement constituted irreparable harm where company was disadvantaged in competitive .....

Forbes and Co Ltd and anr. Vs. the Official Liquidator of the Swadeshi ...

Court : Mumbai

..... liquidation, the chapter dealing with winding up applied and the only provision or substantive provision conferring power of stopping the winding up was conferred on the court by section 466 of the act, and unless the court is satisfied that the company is being taken out of liquidation by way of revival and that it will sub-serve public interest and will conform to commercial morality ..... been an undisclosed agreement between the promoter and the vendor to the company as to the participation by the former in fully paid up shares forming the consideration for the purchase of property by the company on formation; that the promoter has made gifts of fully paid up shares to the directors, that there are other matters connected with the promotion, formation or failure of the company of the conduct of its ..... the right of the management to declare lay off under s.25-n of the industrial disputes act, 1984 under article 19(1)(g) of the constitution are subject to the mandates containing arts.38, 39a ..... contributory and on proof to the satisfaction of the court, that all proceedings in relation to the winding up ought to be stayed, make an order staying the proceedings either altogether i.e permanently or for a limited time that means temporarily, on such terms and conditions as the court thinks fit. ..... of the mill and the question was whether the employment of respondent no.1 continues on such acquisition. ..... for which the company is formed may provide a guide line for the direction to be taken. .....

Vallabhaneni Lakshmana Swamy and anr. Vs. Valluru Basavaiah and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD807; 2004(5)ALT755

..... seat of the district court, the high court, may, with the previous sanction of the government, direct that an appeal from the decree or order of any court of junior civil judge within the local limits of the jurisdiction of such court of senior civil judge shall be preferred in the said court of senior civil judge:provided that the district judge may, from time to time, transfer to his own court ..... state of kerala, : air1995sc1012 , the constitutional bench by majority observed that while holding that in respect of the acquisition proceedings initiated prior to the date of commencement of amending act, the additional amount payable under section 23 (1-a) will be restricted to matters referred to in clause (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) of section 30 of the amending act, it observed that a statute dealing with a substantive right differ from a statute which relates to procedure or evidence or is declaratory in nature inasmuch as while a statute ..... , if it be more than a matter of procedure, if it touches a right in existence at the passing of the act, it was conceded that, in accordance with a long line of authorities extending from the time of lord coke to the present day, the appellants would be entitled to succeed. ..... prior to amendment act 19 of 1984, the district court had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the judgment of subordinate court if the value is ..... (supra), the division bench has to consider the andhra pradesh civil courts (amendment) act, 1984 (act 19 of 1984). .....

The State of West Bengal Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2004)187CTR(SC)219; [2004]266ITR721(SC); JT2004(1)SC375; 2004(1)SCALE425; (2004)10SCC201

..... measure stating : "the high court of punjab proceeded to decide the case on a total wrong assumption that the import fee levied is in the nature of duty which cannot be imposed under the excise act, 1984 when, in fact, the import fee levied is the price for parting with the privilege given to the licensee to import beer into the state and, therefore, the same is within the competence ..... to the complexity of economic regulation, the uncertainty, the liability to error, the bewildering conflict of the experts, and the number of times the judges have been overruled by events, self-limitation can be seen to be the path to judicial wisdom and institutional prestige and stability".their lordships further observed that the courts ought to adopt a pragmaticapproach in solving problems rather than measuring the ..... considered opinion would be against the very scheme of the constitution and supremacy of parliament and such an approach towards interpreting the power sharing devices in relation to entries in list i and list ii would be against the thrust towards centralisation ..... 31, which precedepara 34 above said, their lordships have held that 'royalty' is not a tax.even the last line of para 34 records 'royalty on mineral rights is not atax on land but a payment for the ..... 50, list ii of theseventh schedule of the constitution of india must also be viewed from thecontext that all the mineral rights as also the right to receive royalty byreason of the west bengal estates acquisition act, 1953 and u.p .....