Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: micro small and medium enterprises development act 2006 section 17 recovery of amount due Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 4 results (0.181 seconds)

National Projects Construction Corporation Limited and Anr. Vs. West B ...

Court : Kolkata

..... when there exists an arbitration agreement between two parties, and one of such parties to the arbitration agreement is an entity within the meaning of micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006, does the council established under the provisions of the act of 2006 have jurisdiction to arbitrate the disputes between such parties ..... arbitration. learned advocate for the petitioners submits that, the claim of the third respondent had arisen much prior to the coming into effect of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006. moreover, the third respondent was not registered under the act of 2006 within the time stipulated therein. he further submits ..... court rendered in arbitration petition no.56 of 2013 (m/s.hindustan wires limited v. mr.r.suresh & anr.) and submits that, the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 does not negate an existing arbitration agreement between the parties. the council was wrong in issuing the writing dated march 17, .....

M/S. Rockwool Industries Ltd. Vs. M/S. Lunia Bros (Calcutta)

Court : Kolkata

..... bills would remain outstanding that the appellant failed to pay within the time stipulated. since the respondent was a small-scale industry, they would be entitled to the benefit of the micro, small & medium enterprises development act, 2006 that would give additional protection to the small entrepreneurs in the process to recover their dues. the matter was referred to the arbitration. the tribunal initially tried .....

Wp No. 871 of 2011 Jupitar Alloys Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Kolkata

..... s.34 of the arbitration 3and conciliation act, 1996, are also entitled to question it before the high court under art.226. it is evident from the provisions of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 that the council could make the award only under sub-s.(3) of s.18 thereof; and there is no reason to say that the ..... , 2011 (at p.64) made by the west bengal state micro and; small enterprises facilitation council under s.18 of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006. one asansol steel castings (p) ltd. (the sixth respondent) is a small enterprise within the meaning of the expression defined by s.2(m) of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006, -- an act to provide for facilitating .....

Anvil Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax ...

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... revision before the additional commissioner of commercial taxes, west bengal on the ground that because of the provision of micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 it was not necessary for a small scale industry to get itself registered with the registering authority and the applicant was only required to file memorandum ..... the writ-petitioner has strenuously contended before us that the writ-petitioner having filed memorandum under micro, small and medium enterprises act, 2006, is not required to obtain permanent registration certificate from the directorate of cottage and small scale industries, west bengal and as such, the confirmation of the order rejecting the ..... and thus, has attained finality.7. as regards the other plea, that in view of micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006, it was not necessary to obtain a registration with the directorate of cottage and small scale industries, is equally devoid of any substance. the said act came into force with .....

Development Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rama Engineering

Court : Kolkata

..... , hereinafter referred to as the 1996 act , for setting aside of an arbitral award, has been dismissed on the ground of noncompliance with section 19 of the micro, small medium enterprises development act, 2006, hereinafter referred to as the 2006 act . the impugned award, sought to be set aside was passed under the 2006 act. some of ..... in sub-section(1) of section 7 of that act. (4) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the micro and small enterprises facilitation council or the centre providing alternate dispute resolution services shall have jurisdiction to act as an arbitrator or conciliator under this section in a dispute ..... furnished a copy of the award to the appellant and called upon the appellant to discharge the award. mr. chowdhury argued that under the west bengal micro and small enterprises facilitation council rules, 2006 and in particular rule 12 thereof, the council is to make an arbitral award in accordance with section 31 of the .....

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Court : Kolkata

..... -writ petitioner and also the party respondent who was the complainant before the council. we enactment, the are micro, concerned with small medium and the special enterprises development act, 2006 which indicates how a micro small and medium enterprise if involved in a litigation has to be dealt with. it is not in dispute on the complaint ..... of the party respondent, the west bengal state micro and small enterprises facilitation council (hereinafter referred to as council) took up the ..... while proceeding with the conciliation and if it was to deviate from conciliation to arbitration proceeding and the same reads as under : 18. reference to micro and small enterprises facilitation council (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, any party to a dispute may, with .....

Vs. M/S. National Small Industries Corporation Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

..... council on may 19, 2011 has been assailed on the grounds that the procedure followed by the council was in derogation of the procedure envisaged by section 18 of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 and that the award does not disclose any reasons. it is not necessary to assess whether there has been any infraction of section 18 of ..... .no.1267 of 2013 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side m/s.punjab state electrictiy board, now punjab state transm. versus m/s.national small industries corporation ltd.before: the hon'ble justice sanjib banerjee date : 10th march, 2014. appearance : mr.debabrata roy, adv. for the petitioner ms.s.rahaman, adv. for the respondent the .....

Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... 10, 2014 1. the legality and/or validity of an award dated february 10, 2012 passed by the west bengal state micro & small enterprises facilitation council (hereafter the council) in purported exercise of power conferred by section 18 of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (hereafter the 2006 act) is under challenge in this writ petition at the instance of the petitioning .....

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... encouraged, according to the policy.153. the policy further states that the nigam will also work as a nodal agency for the development of large and medium industries in the state and will play the role of a co-ordinator for the development of industrial infrastructure in growth sectors in partnership with the private ..... expense for the public purpose and it has been specifically defined by stating the employment generation and socio-economic development of the area by setting up tata small car project on the land in question.368. therefore, according to the learned advocate general and other learned senior advocates appearing on behalf of the ..... channel, namely, the official gazette or some other reasonable mode of publication. there may be subordinate legislation which is concerned with a few individuals or is confined to small local areas. in such cases publication or promulgation by other means may be sufficient.352. in the decision reported in : [1997]3scr93 , dinesh trivedi, m.p .....

Yashdeep Trexim Vs. Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ...

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... does not include- (i) an ancillary industrial undertaking as defined in clause (aa) of section 3 of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 (65 of 1951); and (ii) a small scale industrial undertaking as defined in clause (j) of the aforesaid section 3; (n) 'scheduled industry' means any of the industries specified for the time being in the first schedule .....