Court : Delhi
..... by the present petition seeks a direction to the respondent no.1 i.e. micro and small industries facilitations council, new delhi to expeditiously process the reference of the petitioner dated 09.09.2014 under section 18 (4) of the micro small and medium enterprises development act, 2006.2. learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 on ..... advance notice submits that in terms of section 18(4) of the act, the micro and small industries facilitations council or the centre providing w.p.(c) no.1476 ..... 76 *in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + w.p.(c) 1476/2017 judgment delivered on:20. 02.2017 m/s technovations ........ petitioner micro and small industries facilitations council & ors versus ........ respondents advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner for the... respondents :ms. tanya dayal, advocate : mr. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... testing and other equipments in fire.4. on 20.02.2015, the respondent is said to have filed a claim petition before the facilitation council constituted under the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the msme act) claiming a) rs.26,29,375/- towards extra dragging work; b) rs.1, 38, ..... arbitration and conciliation act. 30. reference may also be had to the judgment of the calcutta high court in the case of agriculture finance co. ltd. vs. micro & small enterprises facilitation council, 2013 scc online cal.22786. that was also a case in which there was an allegation that the council had acted in violation of the ..... of the msmed act, a party to a dispute with regard to any amount due under section 17 of the act may make a reference to the micro and small enterprises facilitation council (hereinafter referred to as council). the council may thereafter either itself or through an institution or centre conduct conciliation proceedings in terms of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... by the delayed clearance of the invoices, the respondent/d.h. invoked the conciliation proceedings postulated under the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as msmed act ). since the conciliation proceedings did not succeed, the powers vested in the micro and small enterprises facilitation council (in short council ) were invoked under section 18 (3) of the msmed act and the ..... has referred to a judgment dated 06.08.2018 rendered by the division bench of the bombay high court wpc (c) 5459/2015 entitled gujarat state petronet ltd. v. micro and small enterprises facilitation council wherein it has been observed that despite a separate arbitration agreement governing the parties, the council had the jurisdiction to entertain a reference under the a&c .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... ) and 11(8)(b) of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 (in short the 1996 act). 1.1 in addition to the above, provisions of section 18(4) of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (in short the 2006 act), have also been invoked. 1.2 in effect, the petitioner seeks to replace the present incumbent, who is functioning as an ..... no.3 to the present proceedings. apparently, since the 2006 act is applicable to the petitioner, one of the prayers made in the petition adverts to the fact that the micro and small enterprises council/centre could act as an arbitrator or as conciliator under section 18(4) of the 2006 act. though, during the course of arguments, this prayer was not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... with four agreements each entered into between lineage and bharti on the one hand and pace and bharti on the other hand, or in accordance with the provisions of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (msme act).2. the procedure under the msme act has already been initiated by pace and lineage, and bharti has already invoked arbitration in accordance ..... of proceedings have been stayed.4. the senior counsel for pace and lineage and counsels for bharti were heard at length yesterday, and during the hearing it transpired: (i) that micro and small enterprises facilitation council ( hereinafter referred to as council ) constituted under the msme act cs(comm) nos.792/2017, 920/2018 & 1158/2018 page 2 of 6 has already reported .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... with four agreements each entered into between lineage and bharti on the one hand and pace and bharti on the other hand, or in accordance with the provisions of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (msme act).2. the procedure under the msme act has already been initiated by pace and lineage, and bharti has already invoked arbitration in accordance ..... of proceedings have been stayed.4. the senior counsel for pace and lineage and counsels for bharti were heard at length yesterday, and during the hearing it transpired: (i) that micro and small enterprises facilitation council ( hereinafter referred to as council ) constituted under the msme act cs(comm) nos.792/2017, 920/2018 & 1158/2018 page 2 of 6 has already reported .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... with four agreements each entered into between lineage and bharti on the one hand and pace and bharti on the other hand, or in accordance with the provisions of the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (msme act).2. the procedure under the msme act has already been initiated by pace and lineage, and bharti has already invoked arbitration in accordance ..... of proceedings have been stayed.4. the senior counsel for pace and lineage and counsels for bharti were heard at length yesterday, and during the hearing it transpired: (i) that micro and small enterprises facilitation council ( hereinafter referred to as council ) constituted under the msme act cs(comm) nos.792/2017, 920/2018 & 1158/2018 page 2 of 6 has already reported .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... petitioner was that the dues of the petitioner have been wrongly withheld and the petitioner is entitled to interest including interest under the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 at it was claimed that the petitioner is a small scale industry. the case of the petitioner was that large amounts were illegally withheld by the respondent from the bills of the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... services is a division of petitioner no.2 namely apm infrastructure pvt. ltd. which is duly registered under the o.m.p.(i) (comm) 204/2019 page 1 of 22 micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006. respondent no.1 namely celebi delhi cargo terminal management india pvt. ltd. has been awarded tender by the delhi international airport pvt. ltd. (dial) for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... four weeks.14. by a communication dated 03.12.2015, the respondent rejected the petitioner s claim for interest on delayed payment of the subsidy on the ground that the micro, small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 (hereafter the msmed act ) was inapplicable and, therefore, no interest could be paid under the said act.15. aggrieved by the communication dated 03.12 ..... the said case. factual background 3. the petitioner is a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956. the petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing ssp and owns a small scale unit located at dheerkhera, meerut, uttar pradesh.4. on 17.06.1994, the government of india had introduced the revised scheme for providing concession/subsidy to ssp manufacturers with .....
Tag this Judgment!