Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 section 2 definitions Page 14 of about 24,963 results (1.538 seconds)

Jan 24 2018 (HC)

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... and jhuggi-jhompri clusters, hawkers and urban street vendors, unauthorised colonies, village abadi area (including urban villages), and their extensions, existing involving construction beyond permissible building limits and schools, dispensaries, religious institutions, storages, warehouses and godowns used for agricultural inputs or produce (including dairy and poultry ..... been extracted above.83. the applicant, before the ngt, had complained regarding encroachments made by unscrupulous elements in the forest area and constructions which were dangerous to the preservation of environmental status of the forest. this application was considered and decided by an order dated ..... issue appropriate writ or order or directions thereby directing the respondent to issue necessary notifications, circulars, orders and office orders for removing and unauthorized construction in and around khasra nos.487, 490 and 491 in indira enclave; encroachments the (emphasis supplied) 6. we set down hereunder the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2019 (HC)

M/S Umaxe Projects Private Limited Through: Its Director vs.air Force ...

Court : Delhi

..... remaining bank guarantees were issued towards performance of the contract. respondent no.1 had vide letter dated 6th june 2019, permitted the... petitioner to complete the construction of the first and the second phase of the project by 30th june 2019. however, before the expiry of the extended period, the respondent no.1 ..... 199/2019 page 1 of 10 3. in 2017, the respondent no.1 issued a notice inviting tender (nit) dated 17th october 2017 for balance of construction of all civil work, external development work, internal and external sanitary plumbing work, water distribution system drainage work, landscaping including irrigation lifts and internal electrical works ..... .a. 8565/2019 (exemption) 1. exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. o.m.p.(i) (comm.) 199/2019 brief factual background 2.... petitioner is a construction company. respondent no.1 (air force naval housing board, hereinafter afnhb ) is a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860. o.m.p.(i) (comm.) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

M.Nagalingam Manthirisaba Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

..... properties is not at all acquired, they will not be in any way hampered and in any way affected and they cannot have any say in the matter of construction of road over bridge. therefore, the government is at liberty to proceed with the road over bridge work in accordance with the rules and regulations and without acquiring the ..... the petitioners want to agitate the matter, their lands should have been acquired and when their lands have not been acquired at all and not needed for the proposed construction of the road over bridge, all the points which have been raised before the court need not be gone into. he would further state that if at all, ..... large will be benefited to have the bridge. 3.the learned additional advocate general appearing for the state has filed an affidavit into court mainly contending that for the construction of the road over bridge, they do not want to acquire the properties of the petitioners alone. he also would contend that the width of the existing bridge itself .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2015 (HC)

Naseema Vs. Arikkulam Grama Panchayath

Court : Kerala

..... before the first respondent. in ext.p9, the petitioner attempted to justify his construction and intimated that he has preferred application under the provisions of kerala land utilisation order. it is also stated that the said application was rejected by the ..... ext.p8 provisional order directing the petitioner to stop the construction immediately and directed the petitioner to show cause why ext.p8 order should not be confirmed. in reply to ext.p8 notice, the petitioner preferred ext.p9 ..... r1(a), a notice was issued to the wpc no.16518/2015 5 petitioner to stop the construciton. thereafter, necessary enquiry was made and found that the construction was commenced in contravention with the provisions of kerala panchayat raj act and kerala panchayat building rules; it is stated. therefore, the first respondent has issued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 1991 (TRI)

George Williamson (Assam) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

Reported in : (1991)37ITD392(Gau.)

..... in construing the scope of a legal fiction it would be proper and even necessary to assume all those facts on which alone the fiction can operate, and that a construction which defeats the very objects sought to be achieved by the legislature must, if possible, be avoided. the intention of the legislature, in the present case, was ..... in the case of cwt v. kripashankar dayashanker worah [1971] 81 itr 763 (sc), the hon'ble supreme court observed that a taxing provision must receive a strict construction and if there is any ambiguity, the benefit of that ambiguity must go to the assessee. it was further observed by the court that that is not the same thing ..... not to be whittled down. it is true that the principle that fiscal statutes should be strictly construed does not rule out the application of the principles of reasonable construction to give effect to the purpose or intention of any particular provision as apparent from the scheme of the act, with the assistance of such external aids as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 1934 (FN)

Lumbra Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of either need not be ascertained. the various meanings inhering in the phrase make impossible the ascertainment of any fixed rules or formulae uniformly to govern its construction. that which sometimes results in total disability may cause slight inconvenience under other conditions. some are able to sustain themselves, without serious loss of productive power ..... , if they remain sound but reasonably certain throughout life occasionally to have like periods of temporary illness, they are suffering from "total permanent disability." such a construction would be unreasonable and contrary to the intention of congress. "total disability" does not mean helplessness or complete page 290 u. s. 560 disability, but ..... next definite information as to his employment is that, in july, 1922, he commenced as a machinist's helper in the shops of the central vermont railway company. he worked about two-thirds of full time until may 15, 1923, when he was laid off on account of force reduction. it does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Standard Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . 234 quite plainly to be a desire to halt through the imposition of criminal penalties the depositing of obstructing refuse matter in rivers and harbors. the court's construction eschews the everyday meaning of "refuse matter" -- waste, rubbish, trash, debris, garbage, see webster's new international dictionary, 3d ed. -- and adopts instead ..... act together with other measures dealing with sunken wrecks, [ footnote 2/1 ] trespassing at public works sites, [ footnote 2/2 ] and obstructions caused by improperly constructed bridges, piers, and other structures. [ footnote 2/3 ] these statutes were rendered necessary primarily because navigable rivers, which the congress was appropriating funds to improve, ..... has not acted nor in stretching statutory language in a criminal field to meet strange conditions. but whatever may be said of the rule of strict construction, it cannot provide a substitute for common sense, precedent, and legislative history. we page 384 u. s. 226 cannot construe 13 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 2000 (HC)

Muva Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... not apply to the facts of the present case. in that case a contractor was given job of constructing railway quarters on the land belonging to the railways which work he was doing under the control of the railway administration. construction work simpliciter cannot be equated with the work of manufacture. the quarters in that case were being ..... constructed for railway employees and day to day working of the contractor was under supervision of the railways, hence it could be said that the construction work was being done, for the railways, under control of the railways, on its land. here the petitioner company is a ..... when the employment was being carried on at the place belonging to the railways, for the purpose of construction of railway quarters for the benefit of the employees of the railways. in that case, the work was being carried on under the authority of railways only. it was observed by their lordships in that case that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1993 (HC)

Ramesh Singh and anr. Vs. Chinta Devi and ors.

Court : Patna

..... of justice should be preferred to one which defeats it. a. a. haja muniuddin v. indian railways, (1992) 4 scc 736 : (air 1993 sc361) (at page 741). (iv) the mechanical approach to construction is altogether out of step with the modern positive approach. the modern positive approach is to have ..... without the termination of theemployment of the employee concerned atthat particular time either because he issurplus, inefficient, disobedient and dangerous.' (para 122) 'construction or interpretation of legislative or rule provisions proceeds on the assumption that courts must seek to discover and translate the intention of the legislature or ..... both by commom practice and the application of recognised rules of statutoryconstruction, harsh consequences followingupon an interpretation are not considered asthe governing factor in the construction of astatute, unless its language is unequivocal orambiguous. if the language is plain andcapable of one interpretation only, we will notbe justified in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1992 (HC)

The Special Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Mahesh Vadilal Gandhi and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR419

..... and is plainly erroneous. the special land acquisition officer ignored the factor of potentiality of land in relation to development of the land for building construction in conjunction with neighbouring plots. in my opinion the special land acquisition officer erroneously omitted to consider the relevant aspect of potentiality of development ..... development thereof under the development control rules. some of these restriction as building of residential plots were relaxed by the authorities in case of construction of buildings by the board in pursuance of its rehabilitation schemes in public interest. this plot was a corner plot. before an instance can ..... was observed in the report that many commercial and residential properties were situate in the locality. the victoria terminus station is nearby. the churchgate railway station is also within walking distance from the acquired properties. relying on certain instance concerning sale of plots under backbay reclamation scheme situate far away .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //