Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Court: supreme court of india Page 4 of about 582 results (0.336 seconds)

Nov 03 1981 (SC)

Gulam Abbas and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC2198; 1981CriLJ1835; 1981(3)SCALE1707; (1982)1SCC71; [1982]1SCR1077

..... acquired any customary right over them. they asserted their exclusive rights to perform their religious ceremonies and functions over the plots and averred that existing constructions (details whereof were specified) had been put up long ago exclusively by the shias and were used for their religious ceremonies and functions. the trial ..... court (shri shah ghayas alam sahib, the additional munsif) partly decreed the suit on 2nd february, 1935. he ordered the demolition of the construction on plot no. 245 (being zanana imambara) and issued a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from holding their majlises in the baradari (being mardana imambara on ..... time immemorial for the purposes of their religious ceremonies and functions (azadari, majlises mourning in moharram, tazia and zulzana processions, taziadari, matam, etc.), the constructions having been made by subscriptions and requesting the commissioner to enter the same in the list of shia public waqfs; on the same day i.e. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2005 (SC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC212; (2006)1GLR294; [2006(2)JCR272(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC580; RLW2006(1)SC705; 2005(8)SCALE661; (2005)8SCC534; 2006(1)LC240(SC)

..... it was wrong and productive of inconvenience. secondly, that the decisions upon which title to property depends or which by establishing principles of construction otherwise form the basis of contracts ought to receive the same protection. thirdly, decisions affecting the general conduct of affairs, so that their ..... bullocks were utilized by the farmers to perform agricultural operations (ploughing, sowing, harrowing, planking, threshing), transport-hauling of agricultural product, feeds and fodders, construction materials and drinking water. 40. finally, it proves that majority (93%) of the aged bullocks above 16 years of age are still useful to ..... purposes like agricultural operations (ploughing, planking, harrowing, hoeing, threshing) and transport-hauling of agricultural produce, feeds and fodders of animals, drinking water, construction materials (bricks, stones, sand grits etc.) and for sugarcane crushing/ khandsari making. on an average the bullocks were yoked for 3 to 6 hours .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1999 (SC)

Transport Corporation of India Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC238; JT1999(9)SC12; (2000)ILLJ1SC; (2000)1MLJ128(SC); 2000(2)MPHT295; 1999(7)SCALE63; (2000)1SCC332; [1999]Supp4SCR393; 2000(1)LC287(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC1

..... products ltd. v. employees insurance court and anr. etc. etc. : (1978)illj181sc .24. while interpreting the term 'employees' in a factory, this court, on construction of section 38 of the act, took the view that zonal offices and branch offices of the factory would also be covered by the act, following the earlier decision of ..... appellant's establishment was not under the control of the central government or a railway administration etc., it was the state government which was the 'appropriate government' for deciding the applicability of the act to the appellant's concern. there is no ..... 2 is a definition section. sub-section 1, thereof, defines 'appropriate government' to mean:.in respect of establishments under the control of the central government or a railway administration of major part of a mine or oilfield, the central government, and in all other cases the state government.it is, therefore, obvious that as the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2004 (SC)

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

..... . (see m/s. sainik motors, jodhpur and ors. v. state of rajasthan, : [1962]1scr517 ). 98. it is important to note that in crawford on statutory construction at page 539, it is stated : '271. miscellaneous implied exceptions from the requirements of mandatory statutes, in general.-even where a statute is clearly mandatory or prohibitory, yet, ..... section 2(s) of he industrial disputes act and would not be governed by the provisions of the industrial disputes act. apart from the principle of harmonious construction, the apprentices act 1961 being a subsequent particular law as compared to i.d. act, 1947 which is prior and general , the provisions of apprentices act ..... any person; but does not include an industrial dispute concerning- (i) any industry carried on by or under the authority of the central government or by a railway company, or (ii)such controlled industry as may be specified in this behalf by central government, or (iii) banking and insurance companies as defined in the industrial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2009 (SC)

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and anr. Vs. Minguel Martins and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR711; 2009(4)BomCR348; JT2009(1)SC470; 2009(1)SCALE758; (2009)3SCC571; 2009(1)LC411(SC)

..... panchayat issued letter dated 22.8.1978, whereby appellant no. 1 was permitted to lay access road linking dona-paola-bambolim road to the construction site and construct the hotel subject to the conditions specified in the letter including the one relating to public access to the beach. this was reiterated by the ..... the schedule appended hereto and delineated in the plan hereunder annexed (hereinafter called 'the said land') for the following purpose, namely -tourism development project - construction of hotel at curla, vainguinim, taleigao.and whereas the government being satisfied by an enquiry held under section 40 of the said act that the proposed ..... period physical progress expenditure exupto dec. site development. approx. rs.15 lakhs1978jan. 79 to site development and plinth approx. rs.20 lakhsdec. 79 level construction works ofcentral facility area and firstclusterjan.80 to site development and shell approx rs.40 lakhsdec.80 work of central facility areasand first cluster of rooms.jan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1977 (SC)

The State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Shri Ranganatha Reddy and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC215; (1977)4SCC471; [1978]1SCR641

..... with hopeful foresight, not to circumscribe their connotation into contradiction of the objectives inspiring the provision. to be pharisaic towards the constitution through ritualistic construction is to weaken the social-spiritual thrust of the founding fathers' dynamic faith.99. an american political scientist, benjamin twiss, commented with ..... and profits to the exclusion of standards of consumption and general well-being, lawyers have taken a negative rather than a creative and constructive attitude toward social development. in defending rights of untrammelled enterprise against rules of fair play and in presuming the unconstitutionality of legislative enactments, ..... they have missed their cue to the role of constructive leaders and have been instead dogs in the manger.(lawyers for social change: perspectives on public interest law: by robert l. rabin stanford .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 2002 (SC)

Ref. by President

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC87; (2002)8SCC237

..... is primarily to give effect to the real intention of the parliament inenacting the legislation. such denial would deprive the court of a substantial andilluminating aid to construction of the provisions of the constitution. the modernapproach has to a considerable extent eroded the exclusionary rule in england.18. since it is permissible to look ..... from thevarious relief camps where they were staying.91. in the last week of february, 2002 an unfortunate incident took place atthe railway station in godhara in gujarat in which a railway compartment was seton fire and several people who were occupants of that compartment died ofburning. after this incident a spate of communal ..... been the intention of the legislature, thatit is proper to look for some other possiblemeaning of the word or phrase'. the context, asalready seen, in the construction of statutes,means the statute as a whole, the previous state ofthe law, other statutes in pari material the generalscope of the statute and the mischief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2011 (SC)

Machavarapu Srinivasa Rao, and anr. Vs. the Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... vijayawada, guntur, tenali, mangalagiri urban development authority had the jurisdiction to grant permission to respondent no.3 - sri venkateswara swamivari alaya nirmana committee for construction of temple at the site of which land use was shown as recreational in the zonal development plan approved by the state government and whether the ..... and general commercial use]. 4. industrial use zone 5. public and semi public use zone 6. recreational use zone. 7. transportation and communication use zone (roads, railways, airports, bus depots and truck terminals) 8. agricultural use zone. 9. water bodies. 5. respondent no.3, which was registered as a society in march ..... of which, as contained in annexure p-4 of the slp paper book, are extracted below: therefore the `residential welfare association' is permitted to construct sri venkateswara swamy vari temple in the earmarked site and orders are issued accordingly. the said `residential welfare association' alaya committee is directed to follow the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1979 (SC)

Chettian Veetil Ammad and anr. Vs. Taluk Land Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC1573; (1980)1SCC499; [1979]3SCR839

..... whether it is retroactive.35. in doing so, we shall be guided by the plain and clear language of the sub-section, that is the primary rule of construction, for the legislature is intended to mean what it has expressed. we shall also bear in mind the other equally important rule of interpretation that a statute is not ..... a general rule of construction whenever it became necessary to ascertain the date of commencement of a particular provision of the act other than section 1.11. it will be recalled that sub-section ..... provisions on the dates appointed for them, but, for obvious reasons, rule (iv) continued to hold the field in as much as it laid down the rule of construction that any reference to the 'commencement of this act' shall be construed as a reference to the coming into force of that particular provision. it was therefore applicable as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1992 (SC)

Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited and anr. Vs. Reser ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC1033; [1992]75CompCas12(SC); 1991CriLJ1391; JT1992(1)SC405; 1992(1)SCALE216; (1992)2SCC343; [1992]1SCR406

..... , therefore, are statutory regulations.58. in state of u.p. v. babu ram, : 1961crilj773 , this court held that rules made under a statute must be treated, for all purposes of construction or obligations, exactly as if they were in that act and are to the same effect as if they contained in the act and are to be judicially noticed for ..... all purposes of construction or obligations. the statutory rules cannot be described or equated with administrative directions. in d. v.k. prasada rao v. govt. of a.p. : air1984ap75 , the same view was laid .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //