Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)213; 68(1977)DLT914
..... to claim damages or compensation. the claim made by the plaintiff is that if the sale deed has been executed in 1978 he would have put up construction by buying material at cheap rates and now the costs had increased and thereforee thereforee the first defendant is bound to compensate the plaintiff. the learned counsel ..... (deceased by l.rs) and another, 1982 aii. lj 948; pandurang ganpat tanawade v. ganpat bhairu kadam & ors., 1996(6) sct 627; prem raj v. d.l.f. housing and construction pvt. ltd and anr., : [1968]3scr648 ; n.p. thirugnanam (dead) by l.rs. v. dr. r.jagan mohan rao and ors., : air1996sc116 ; kommisethi venkatasubbayya v. karamsetti venkateswarluand ..... selling and have an industry of soyabean processing in madhya pradesh, manufacturing refund oil. he approached m/s mahender jain & company for the purpose of suit plot to construct his own house. the property dealer took him to dr. achhar singh and there negotiations were held. dr. achhar singh gave him a copy of the power of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : LC2008(3)257; 2008(38)PTC477(Del)
..... to be read into them in the absence of enacted domestic law occupying the field when there is no inconsistency between them. it is now an accepted rule of judicial construction that regard must be had to international conventions and norms for construing domestic law when there is no inconsistency between them and there is a void in the domestic law .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1978Delhi536
..... s. 302 indian penal code. the convictions of sunil under s. 302 indian penal code .for the murders of the gunman and the driver and the rest of theappellants constructively under the said section in repect of both thesemurders by invoking s. 34 of the indian penal code. are unexceptionable ; equallyunexceptionable are the convictions of each of the ..... sunil, sharadkapur (younger brother of ravi) left for delhi by the de luxe train.the next day they reached delhi and went to v. jaggi's office from the railway station. the date was not mentioned. public witness i hadalso mentioned, when he was examined under s. 164, that he hadgone to delhi only in the middle of ..... 'a sharp look-out may bemaintained aind if any clue leading to the tracing of the case is foundimmediate information be passed on to the superintendent of policecrime and railways delhi by the quickest possible means'. the reference made by the driver to 'mone' only shows that they did not havelong hair. the driver did not have any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)573; 1995(34)DRJ492
..... . learned counsel for the defendant dmc has pointed out that the action was initiated against all the buildings of the locality which were having unauthorised constructions/ deviations and / or unauthorised users subject to permissible compounding. however, in most of the cases the demolition was stayed by different judicial fora. ..... unauthorised activity. he further submitted that in so far as delhi is concerned, building bye laws, 1983 are applicable, appendix-q whereof categories unauthorised constructions into two:- non-compoundable and compoundable. he states that in compoundable items deviations are being compounded as a matter of course while in non- ..... had been. issued permitting only residential use of the building. however, after obtaining the completion certificate the building owner smt usha pathak carried out unauthorised construction of excess coverage at the basement, ground floor, first floor and second floor, by covering the second floor completely ( i.e. 100% coverage) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 48(1992)DLT347; 1992(23)DRJ225; 1993(41)ECC121
..... or doubt about applicability is lifted and the subject falls in the notification, then full play has to be given to it and it calls for a wider and liberal construction which results in inequitable results and is incongruous is to be avoided. this is the principle of interpretation of the exemption notification in this case. (22) mr. asthana, learned counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)713; 98(2002)DLT151; 2002(63)DRJ756
..... the public premises. factually, this is not so. the petitioner was in unauthorized occupation of the land in question. on this land, the petitioner made an unauthorized construction. the petitioner was given a show cause notice and then asked to remove the offending structure by the estate officer. this situation is clearly covered by section 5a ..... words 'belonging to' and not ownership. if, thereforee, the union of india has dominion over the property and if the said property had been entrusted to the railway club by such mere entrustment it does not cease to belong to the union of india. thereforee, the definition under section 2(e) will apply.'29. transposing ..... 27. in naresh kumar v. vith addl. distt. judge, varanasi and others., , a cinema building owned by the union of india was entrusted to the eastern railway administration for its management. the building was given on license to the appellant for a period of five years. on the expiry of this period, proceedings were initiated against .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : (2009)225CTR(Del)1; [2009]317ITR107(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN100(Delhi)
..... in the facts and circumstances of the case the amendment was clarificatory in nature and hence retrospective. it is evident that the applicability of this principle will depend on the construction of the provision and the fact situation obtaining in a case.17.8 reliance was also placed by the revenue on the judgment of the supreme court in the case ..... made by the assessee of over rs 1 crore. he submits that the assessees claim with respect to section 80hhc was made based on the following judgments: cit v. shirke construction equipments ltd. : (2000) 246 itr 429 (bom) and cit v. smt. t.c.usha : (2004) 266 itr 497 (ker). the position in law was, however, set at rest, according to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 112(2004)DLT1
..... deemed to have been sanctioned by the authority. counsel for the petitioner contended that the stand taken by the respondent/uoi that petitioner can only construct one-storey building is arbitrary, irrational and illegal. it was contended that the stand of the respondent/uoi that plot of the land was partitioned ..... 2001 and thereforee any other administrative instructions in consistent with the said master plan cannot hold the field. the specific provision of master plan for construction is reproduced below;'specific premises--residential plot -- plotted housingmaximum ground coverage, far number of dwelling and maximum height for different size of residential plot ..... was also contended that the appellate tribunal after considering the entire material on record had directed the respondent to make the survey of the buildings constructed or situated on amrita shergil marg, new delhi. the respondent filed the survey report wherein the respondent admitted that the buildings situated adjoining to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1998Delhi95; [1997]89CompCas438(Delhi)
..... make modifications in the draft scheme as it may consider necessary in the light of suggestions and objections received from the banking company and the transferee bank. on a simple construction of sub-sections (5) and (6) and on the basis of the sequence pattern adopted in section 45, it would be legitimate to hold that the act contemplates the employees .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2003IVAD(Delhi)537; III(2003)BC185; 105(2003)DLT724; 2003(69)DRJ369
..... counsel. before adverting to the legal position on facts, it may be noticed that the plaintiff was the sole proprietor of a construction firm and defendant is a society. disputes between the parties relate to a contract executed for construction of staff housing/teaching block. it is the plaintiff's case that the architect, under whose supervision the work was carried, was .....
Tag this Judgment!