Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1996)113PLR407
..... substance in any of these contentions. it is seen that long after the notification under section 4(1) was published in the gazette, the appellant had purchased the property and constructed the house thereon. therefore, as against the state his purchase was not lawful and it could not be used against the state to clothe it with a colour of title ..... . radhey sham gupta v. state of haryana (1982)84 p.l.r. 743;3. smt. ranjit kaur v. state of punjab 1983 p.l.j 164;4. dehri rohtash light railway co. ltd. v. district board, bhojpur, a.i.r. 1993 s.c. 802; and5. s. mohan singh v. financial commissioner (revenue), punjab, (1967)69 p.l.r. 377.6. learned ..... entered into an agreement for purchase of the land with the punjab united forge limited. the petitioner says that after purchase of the property, she applied for permission to raise construction in the form of a shopping centre and the chief administrator, faridabad complex administration, faridabad granted permission to her.however, when she started .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1996)133CTR(P& H)224; [1996]219ITR461(P& H)
..... reports submitted by the registered valuers, the shape of the plot being irregular, the distance from the property to the nearest recognised school, hospital, shopping centre and railway station being 8. km., the construction on the plot being temporary, frontage of the factory building being very small and irregular, losses suffered by the transferor and the sale being a distress sale and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1994)108PLR596
R.S. Mongia, J.1. This writ petition was admitted on August 31,1993. While ordering dispossession-of stayad-interim notice regarding stay was also given. There was very serious dispute regarding the factum of possession. Both parties were claiming that they were in possession of the land in dispute. Even a Local Commissioner was appointed for that purpose. The arguments on stay matter were lengthy and I thought it appropriate to hear the parties in the main case/The parties counsel consented that the main case itself be decided. Consequently,I heard learned counsel for the parties in the main case.2. The facts giving rise to the present petition may be noticed. Motu Ram and Naru Ram sons of Jodha Ram were the displaced persons from West Pakistan and in lieu of the laud left by them in Pakistan, they were held entitled to allotment of certain rural land under Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'). Vide orders dated 29.9.1977, 25...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1993)105PLR79
..... (iii) generating, transforming or transmitting power; or (iv) composing types for printing, printing by letterpresses, lithography, photogravure, or other similar process, or bookbinding; or (v) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, refitting, finishing or breaking up ships or vessels; or (vi) preserving or storing any article in cold storage;' 9. the whole case of the corporation is ..... the product that it produces. the entire establishment would be a factory and even a clerk would be an employee of that establishment. in works manager, central railway workshop, jhansi v. vishwanath and ors., a.i.r. 1970 supreme court 488, it was held that the persons who were working as time-keepers, prepared ..... a mine subject to the operation of the mines act, 1952(xxxv of 1952) a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the union, a railway running shed or a hotel, restaurant or eating place. explanation- for computing the number of workers for the purposes of this clause all the workers in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : 1987(13)ECC60; 1987(12)LC621(P& H); 1987(30)ELT876(P& H)
..... refund the amount of excess sales tax to its purchasers. but that is a matter between the company and the purchasers and the state cannot seek to levy tax on railway freight if it is not made a part of the price.'31. all these decisions were considered by a division bench of the andhra pradesh high court in kesoram cements .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1986)57CTR(P& H)176; [1986]161ITR78(P& H)
Pritpal Singh, J.1. Having arisen out of the same order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, the present six appeals (Income-tax Appeals Nos. 4 to 9 of 1978) under Section 269H of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), are being disposed of together.2. The facts leading to these appeals are that by a registered sale deed dated May 5, 1973, Mela Singh Surjit Singh, Prakash Singh, Smt. Gian Kaur and Smt. Gurcharan Kaur transferred a vacant plot of land measuring 1,865 square yards situated in Krishna Nagar, Amritsar, in favour of Jagdish Chand Bhatia, Gopal Dass and O.P. Mani, for an ostensible consideration of Rs. 52,000. The Competent Authority, who was the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (Acquisition Range), Amritsar, got the matter investigated in respect of the fair market value of the plot in dispute. The Income-tax Inspector who was deputed to make the investigation reported that the fair market value of the plot was much more t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : 1988(33)ELT331(P& H)
..... -division of the factory' and 'store room or other place or storage'. besides that, against these columns, it is mentioned that towards north, there is g.t. road, towards south-railway line, towards east - residences/green fields and towards west-kingwah canal. for the columns meant for 'distinguishing letter or number or letter and number of each', 'detailed description of each .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : 1981CriLJ1069
..... rise to the issue though of somewhat political prominence, lie in a narrow compass. on the baisakhi day of april 1.3, 1978, a gruesome incident took place near the railway stadium, amritsar, in which as many as 17 persons, including dharam-vir singh, the son of lai singh petitioner, lost their lives. consequent thereto a criminal case was registered in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1981P& H237
..... of the question of relationship betwixt a landlord and tenant in innumerable cases my well involve no question of title at all. it my merely revolve around the construction of a lease, rent or any other deed or document executed between the parties and the relationship flowing or deducible therefrom. in many other cases indeed no dispute ..... to a proceeding in execution. the committee were informed that it had already been held by the privy council as well as the supreme court that the principles of constructive res judicata apply to the proceedings in execution. the committee, therefore, feel that instead of inserting new section 11-a section should be so amended as to ..... to s. 11 of the code, which was a true pointer to the purpose and object of the amendment with great humility, it appears to me that the construction sought to be placed o the words 'court of limited jurisdiction' by my learned brother goyal, j. would defeat the very purpose of the amendment which expressly was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : 1981CriLJ1906
ORDERM.M. Punchhi, J.1. The revision-petitioner filed a criminal complaint against the accused-respondents for offences disclosed therein. Preliminary evidence was recorded on different dates by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dabwali, vide his order dated 5-3-1976, he ordered summoning of the accused. The occurrence involved therein had connection with a police challan which was in the nature of a cross case. The police had submitted a police report before the said Judicial Magistrate. On 20-11-1976 the complainant orally requested the Court, which he reiterated by a written application on the same day, that the coin plaint be committed to the Court of Session in the view that the cross case on the basis of the police report had bean committed to the Court. The learned Magistrate, vide his order dated 7-2-1977, committed the complaint case to the Court of Session agreeing with the complainant so as to avoid conflicting decisions in the cases. However, the learned Additional...
Tag this Judgment!