Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 2 results (0.097 seconds)

Jan 30 2008 (HC)

Kabla Singh Vs. Kailash Kumari and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008ACJ1912

..... the manner directed by the high court' because the later expression would lose its efficacy if the word 'entertained' had to be construed in its absence.11. thus harmonising the construction of the above-mentioned two expressions appearing in the first proviso to section 173 of the motor vehicles act, in accordance with the scheme of chapter xii of the motor .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2004 (HC)

Sher-i-kashmir National Medical Institute Trust Vs. State of J and K a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... seventeen thousand and eight hundred). in this connection, the respondents have appended with the reply as annexure r4, an extract statement of expenses incurred on construction, development and maintenance of the medical institute. according to the respondents, the medical institute was being run on the total investment of the state exchequer ..... . ali jan shopping complex) over which the state government asserts the lawful title and claims as real owner thereof vis--vis those who have raised construction thereon and are in physical possession thereof; and;5) referring of the matter to the vigilance organisation for investigating the transfer of the land mentioned ..... trust represented on the governing body.18) if any dispute, doubt, difference, or question shall at any time hereafter arise touching or concerning the construction, effect or meaning of any clause of this agreement or any matter connected therewith, or the respective rights and liabilities of the partiers hereto, then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1989 (HC)

Prabjeet Singh Vs. Administrator, Notified Area Committee, Tangmarg/Gu ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1989J& K75

..... 3-1987 based on decision dt. 11-3-1987 and govt. order dated 25-1-1975 the petitioner and respondent under law are entitled to construct the proposed construction at gulmarg and the respondent no. 1 is to see that they adhere to the terms of the building permission order and in case they violate ..... already approved by the chairman building permission committee (shri b.l. chackoo). upon this respondent no. 3 was conveyed that building permission has been granted for construction of hotel at pinnacle site. the respondent submits that this was not based on any approval or recommendation of the building permission committee. after the petitioner ..... project organisation gulmarg to have control of all engineering works within the notified area. respondent no. 1 has no authority and he is unconnected with the construction activities at gulmarg. it is the building permission committee which is competent to decide about the legality or otherwise of a building permission. once the building persmission .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //