Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka dharwad Page 1 of about 4 results (0.466 seconds)

Mar 22 2012 (HC)

Kakaral Ravikumar, Koppa and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. b ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... of basapural village, koppal district, land audit committee to assess the actual land requirement for the project. power:- kptcl / gescom to provide 20 mw grid support during construction and operation, to be arranged from munirabad sub-station. water:- the water resources department to examine the request of the co for allotment of 12.55 mgd water ..... that certain extent of land beyond the national highway on the northern potion of the lands which were desired for acquisition abetting basapura village and up to railway line and to some extent beyond which were not even aspired for by the fourth respondent original applicant have also been included in the notifications issued under ..... these respondents, particularly, the lands lying even to the north of nh-64, in particular to include the land lying in between the national highway and the railway lane to cover under the notifications issued under sections 3(1) and 28(1) of the act and therefore submits that not only reveals non-application to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2023 (HC)

Hubballi Uraban Development Authority Vs. Hubballi Dharwad Municipal C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... limits on n.h.7 and the entire land surrounding the checkpost office belongs to the state government, railway administration as well as to the indian medical research centre. it is alleged that the 1st respondent has constructed and running a hotel/dhaba in the name and style of m/s.shiva bar and restaurant, without ..... limits on n.h.7 and the entire land surrounding the checkpost office belongs to the state government, railway administration as well as to the indian medical research centre. it is alleged that the 1st respondent has constructed and running a hotel/dhaba in the name and style of m/s.shiva bar and restaurant, without ..... of 2022 and connected matters to receive compensation; in other words, demarcating/earmarking the subject lands for road widening would have the limited/restricted effect of preventing construction activity and would neither affect the right, title, interest or possession of the writ petitioners over the said lands nor their right to receive compensation upon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2017 (HC)

M/S J K Cement Works Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... x x x x x x x x x x furniture including slotted angles and ready to assemble parts of furniture, stationery articles including paper, sanitary fittings, cement and other construction materials including bricks, timber, wood, glass, mirrors, roofing materials, stones, tiles and paints, toilet articles. 18 / 39 date of order:23. 03.2017 strp nos. ..... decisions rendered under the income tax act, 1961 are with reference to the immoveable assets and not on the materials which are used for the purpose of constructing such immoveable assets. therefore, all the case laws cited and relied by the appellant in the instant case is not at all applicable for the purpose of ..... though immoveable property, as goods in the nature of plant, by no stretch of imagination, the cement which is one of the raw materials used for the construction of factory building or silos or foundation cannot be considered as capital goods. the very expression capital goods imply assets which are having longer life and such assets .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 2017 (HC)

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society, Vs. Siddappa G Namba,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... act should be treated as workmen. the acceptance of this argument will render the words 'to do any skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work' meaningless. a liberal construction as suggested would have been possible only in the absence of these words. the decision in may and baker (india) ltd. v. their workmen,, (air1967sc678 (supra) precludes us from taking .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //