Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 20 takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... approach holds good while ascertaining the intent and purpose of an enactment or its scope and application. now, the result of the impugned judgment is that the amending act has become an exercise in futility - a purposeless piece of legislation. and this result has been arrived at by pointing out some drafting errors and some ..... at the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution .....
Tag this Judgment!