Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... act 1961 to the petitioner/revisioner while extending the same benefit to his daughter and other family members, even after they were made accused in the same complaint petition and against them learned court below has refused to ..... submitted that the o.p.no.2, who is the father of the complainant-rimjhim jha was not entitled for the benefit under section 7(3) of the dowry prohibition act which was an immunity clause enacted for the protection of the complainant and that the opposite party no.2 ..... husband persuaded her and requested to come back and join his society but of no avail and finally he filed a petition under section 9 of the hindu marriage act before the court of district judge, gurgaon, haryana for the restitution of conjugal rights, at the place where he was posted in service but after about three months ..... behalf of the petitioner and the opposite party no.2, i find that since no prima facie offence under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act could be made out against the opposite party no.2 his criminal proceeding for the alleged offence would tantamount to misuse of the process ..... a cognizable offence by giving and abetting to accept dowry was made out against the opposite party no.2 in terms of section 3 of the dowry prohibition act and at the same time, they were not entitled to get immunity of the offence under section 7(3) of the dowry prohibition act because the father of the girl rimjhim jha was not a complainant and such immunity was provided only to the complaint. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... measuring 1 decimal which was never agricultural land, rather it was a homestead land, still an application was filed by the respondent no.5 under section 16(3) of the bihar land reforms (fixation of ceiling area and acquisition of surplus land) act, 1961 claiming himself to be an adjoining raiyat before the land reform deputy commissioner, hazaribagh.2. .....
Tag this Judgment!