Marriage - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marriage Page 1 of about 37 results (0.010 seconds)Hma Data Systems Private Limited Vs. Ssi Limited Represented by Its Au ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (2009)5MLJ1174
The further clause in the letter of intent is that HMA shall refund the earnest money deposit without interest within seven
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“that the Marriage of Amandeep Singh Accused Was Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Section 304B/34 IPC. It is necessary to mention here that marriage between Amandeep Singh and deceased Gagandeep Kaur was solemnized on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“The Marriage Between the Parties Is Admitted. the Parties Are Resid ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Simran (petitioner) (for short the petitioner-wife.) for dissolution of their marriage by way of decree of divorce under Section 13 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBadrudIn Abdulla Hirji Vs. Registrar of Marriages
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1946Bom129; (1945)47BOMLR938
appointed for the purpose of giving such consent to the marriage of the minor. There is no provision in the Act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGiby George and anr. Vs. Marriage Officer (Principal District Registra ...
Court: Kerala
Reported in: AIR2007Ker152; I(2008)DMC220
the Act other than one solemnized ceremoniously under the Special Marriage Act, 1872 or under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 may
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhumika Mohan Jaisinghani and Anr. Vs.registrar of Marriage and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Act. It is also not disputed that the Registrar of Marriages duly informed the petitioners that they were married. The petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVipIn V. Rajan and anr. Vs. Sub-registrar (Marriage Officer)
Court: Kerala
Reported in: AIR2007Ker264; I(2008)DMC55; 2007(3)KLJ255
was submitted without complying with Section 15(f) of the Special Marriage Act on the ground that the provision is directory.2. Petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudha Rani Agarwal Vs. Marriage Officer on Duty and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1992(24)DRJ294
was held that there is no prohibition under the Special Marriage Act. 1954 read with Foreign Marriage Act. 1969 of a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPuthiya Kottal Faizal Musaliar Vs. Marriage Officer, Chalai
Court: Kerala
the respondent to not act ultra vires of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 and Registration Act, 1908 in any way. III.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohn Roji Vs. Marriage Officer
Court: Kerala
Reported in: I(2005)DMC320; 2004(1)KLT687
respondent to take sworn statements from the petitioners, register the marriage and issue certificate to the petitioners within a week from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>