Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: marking of heavy packages act 1951 preamble 1 marking of heavy packages act 1951 Court: orissa Page 1 of about 7 results (0.313 seconds)

Nov 20 1996 (HC)

Rabindra Kumar Mallick Vs. Panchanan Kanungo and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1998(II)OLR214

..... to as the 'rules') inter alia, enjoins that every baillot paper before being issued to an elector should be stamped on the back with such distinguishing mark as directed by the election commission. there is no dispute that the distinguishing circular seal containing the constituency number and the booth number is the instrument prescribed ..... for the petitioner has submitted that even assuming that the polling officials had supplied the instrument, since it was not the prescribed instrument, the ballots marked with such unauthorised instrument should be rejected as invalid. he has submitted that when the provisions of the act or the statutory rule prescribe the manner ..... evide ntly, p.w. 10) and some other agent had come to the central table and showed some ballot papers which had contained distinguishing circular seal mark and the assistant returning officer told that all such ballot papers containing distinguishing circular seal should be kept as doubtful ballot papers. he, however,does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1991 (HC)

Kanak Vardhan Singhdeo Vs. Sri Bibekananda Meher and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1991Ori231

..... respondents 3 and 4 as well as in favour of the petitioner were counted in favour of respondent no. 1 and large number of ballot papers containing no marking or marking on the reverse side of the ballot without indicating the intention of the elector in whose favour the ballot has been cast and were, therefore, liable to be ..... . 4 have been illegally and improperly received and counted in favour of the respondent no. 1. (iv) at least 927 ballot papers containing valid votes with clear marking on the side of the respondent no. 3 which should have been received and counted for respondent no. 3 have been illegally and improperly received and counted in favour ..... 3 or respondent no. 4 were improperly counted in favour of respondent no. 1 and large number of ballots which were liable to be rejected on account of double marking were improperly received and counted in favour of respondent no. 1. the counting agents of the petitioner were not given opportunity to inspect such ballot papers. after the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1994 (HC)

Miss Kalpanamayee Devi Vs. Indira Gandhi National Open University and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 78(1994)CLT453; 1994(II)OLR56

..... services with the university, sri mohapatra, learned counsel lor the opp. parties contends that regularisation is an equitable relief and as the petitioner bad tampered with the attendance register, by marking her presence during.the break period, she was not entitled to the relief of regularisation. it is also submitted that the petitioner cannot be regularisation as she is no longer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 1984 (HC)

Ganesh Sendha Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1984(I)OLR412

..... were antimortem in nature and that the death was as a result of shook and haemorrhage. he has further opined that all the injuries might have been caused try a heavy hand and blunt weapon,9. the blaming truth of the prosecution story has been unfolded by the deposition 'of p. w. 1. he has stated that on the date of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2009 (HC)

Purna Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2009(I)OLR1006

..... cut the interdigital muscles of left hand along with interdigital vessels.he opined that all the injuries were ante-mortem in nature and could have been caused by any heavy or moderately heavy cutting weapon.8. defence has examined one witness, namely, bajia behera, a co-villager in front of whose house the occurrence took place. he stated that he went to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2007 (HC)

Gula and ors. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2582

..... joint. margins were clean cut and contused.as per her (p.w. no. 3) opinion injury nos. (ii) and (iii) were simple in nature and might have been caused by heavy sharp cutting weapon, such as axe. as regards injury no. 1 he did not give any opinion and stated that he referred the injured to surgical specialist for his opinion .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 1974 (HC)

State of Orissa Vs. Sukra Singh

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1975CriLJ200

S. K. Ray, J.1. This is an appeal by the State under Section 417. Cr. P. C. from the judgment of acquittal dated 5-12-70 of the Sessions Judge, Mayurbhanj-Keonjhar passed in S. T. No. 30-M of 1969 whereby accused-respondent Sukra Singh has been acquitted of the charge under Section 302, I. P. C. for having committed murder of one Budhu Singh, his paternal uncle.2. The prosecution story may now be related. The deceased had 5 brothers. His elder brother Durga Singh having died he married the latter s widow Gurubari, who is P.W. 1. The accused is the son of Gurubari by her first husband Durga Singh. He, the deceased and P. Ws. 1 to 4 belong to the same village. On 20-3-69 Selei Puja was being performed in the village and general feast was being held on that occasion. All villagers, both young or old., congregated at the Puja to participate in the feast. The feast was over before dusk and all the villagers left that place for their respective houses. Chukulu (P. W. 3) is another brother of...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //