Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: marking of heavy packages act 1951 preamble 1 marking of heavy packages act 1951 Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 23 results (0.383 seconds)

Jan 29 1991 (HC)

K.K. Vasant Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1992Kant256; ILR1991KAR1301; 1991(2)KarLJ518

..... the state government to preserve the lost forest wealth in allowing such exploitation. he has further averred that on account of the ill regulated exploitation of the forests and non marking of the survey of the forest area coverage in the state periodical by the state government has seriously affected the flora and fauna of the state thereby causing erosion, lack .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1985 (HC)

State Bank of India Vs. Hegde and Golay Limited

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2364

..... the provisions of order ii, rule 2 c.p.c., in that all the seven cash credit accounts constituted one transaction as the dealing with the bank was a package deal for financing the industrial complex of hgl. according to the learned counsel, these seven accounts are the result of a single agreement between the bank and the company ..... examined by him and on every balance sheet and profit and loss account etc. the auditor having complied with the provisions of section 227 in respect of the balance sheets marked as ex.p. 127 to p. 132, the attack on the statement of accounts and the ledger entries as incorrect and not in accordance with the requirement of ..... two witnesses, namely, doreswamy, chartered engineer and consultant as rw-2 & p. laxminarasimhan, practising cost accountant as rw-4. rw-2 has submitted his valuation report which is marked as ex. r.4. he is the member of the institution of valuers of india and also founder member of the karnataka chapter of the institute of valuers ; he is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2011 (HC)

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

..... measurement. therefore, in the letter annexure-r33 they are categorical in stating that they are not responsible for the correctness of the positions of the sites marked by shivasakthi sugars on the maps and the addresses of the existing factory, etc., as they were not verified by the department. neither the sugar ..... after receiving the application from the indenter, survey of india will find out the distances from the existing topographical maps. the distances are calculated from the marked portions, which generally meet the required accuracy. 79. therefore, it is obvious that the survey of india has not determined the distance by conducting measurement ..... ) after receiving the application from the indenter, survey of india will find out the distances from the existing topographical maps. the distances are calculated from the marked positions, which generally meet the required accuracy. the policy was amended with effect from 01.01.2008 and new policy was also set out. 46. thereafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2001 (HC)

S.M. Sadanandaiah Vs. the Returning Officer, Baramasagara Reserved Ass ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant428; ILR2001KAR1314; 2001(6)KarLJ522

..... the learned counsel for the applicant contends that the petitioner without filing amendment application and without seeking the permission of the court, has inserted form 21-e, which is marked as document 2 and that insertion is made in the month of january 2000, and therefore, there is delay in filing the election petition and in view of that ..... , there is difference of one number. in fact, the allegation in para 6 of the election petition that the order passed by the first respondent is produced and marked as document 3 it is earlier to the correction. it can be understood that if the document itself was not produced, then it can be understood that there is ..... is non-compliance of provisions of sub-section (3) of section 81 of the act. in paragraph 7 of the affidavit, he elaborately states the discrepancy in the marking of the documents and states that the document produced and served on him do not tally with the original and therefore, there is non-compliance of statutory provisions. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1981 (HC)

Newspapers and Periodicals Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1981(2)KarLJ577; (1982)ILLJ189Kant

..... election of parliament regulated by the constitution and the laws comes within this gravitational orbit. the most valuable right in a democratic policy is the little man's little pencil-marking, assenting or dissenting, called his vote. a democratic right, if denied inflicts civil consequences. likewise, the little man's right, in a representative system of government, to rise to prime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 25 1971 (HC)

C. Rangappa Lachmiah and ors. Vs. the Range Forest Officer, Raichur an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1972Kant76; AIR1972Mys76

..... sawing of timber belonging to other persons on jobwork, unless he is satisfied about the bona fides of such timber by examining the connected pass or way permit and the marks on the timber. if he suspects the bona fides of the timber, he shall detain the timber and immediately report the fact to the nearest forest or police officer for ..... , saw mills, or any other sawing contrivance, and the converting, cutting, processing, distilling, storing, burning, concealing marking or super marking of timber or other forest produce, the altering or effacing or any marks on the same, or the possession or carrying of marking hammers or other implements used for marking timber; ** ** ** ** ** ** 5. sub-section (3) of section 54 empowers provision being made by rules for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1990 (HC)

Bagalkot Udyog Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR1962

..... manner acting upon or in furtherance of or in implementation of the said amendment dated 3rd may 1979 and the various prices fixed thereunder which amendment is hereto annexed and marked ex.c1;ii) respondents 1 to 3 their subordinate officers servants and agents be restrained by an order and injunction from in any manner compelling and/or requiring the 1st ..... manner acting upon or in furtherance of or in implementation of the said amendment dated 3rd may 1979 and the various prices fixed thereunder which amendment is hereto annexed and marked ex.01;ii) respondents 1 to 3 their subordinate officers, servants and agents be restrained by an order and injunction of this hon'ble court from in any manner acting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2020 (HC)

Smt Jayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN WRIT PETITION No.6872/2013(KLR)BETWEEN : 1 . SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED50YEARS2. 3 . 4 . SRI NAGESH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED32YEARS SRI MAHESH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA AGED31YEARS PETITIONER Nos. 1 TO3ARE R/A NO.490/A, ACCS LAYOUT D BLOCK, SINGASANDRA CHIKKABEGUR ROAD, MADIVALA PO, BANGALORE68 SMT. ROOPA W/O D S NAGARAJ AGED28YEARS (BY SRI SUNIL S RAO, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONERS SRI S.P. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL AS AMICUS CURIAE, ...PETITIONERS SRI K. SUMAN, AS AMICUS CURIAE, SRI V. LAKSHMINARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL, SRI M.R. RAJAGOPAL, ADVOCATE, SRI BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE, 2 SRI UDAYAPRAKASH MULIYA, ADVOCATE, SRI RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, ADVOCATE, SRI AJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE, SMT. CHANNAMMA, ADVOCATE, SRI G.B. SHASTRY, ADVOCATE TO ASSIST HONBLE COURT) AND: 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . THE STATE OF...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2011 (HC)

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2011(2)KCCR1662

..... way of evidence and if a harmonious construction of the words document and evidence and section 39 is resorted to, it inevitably leads to the inference that marking of only the identified/selected 4 cds from amongst the 14 cds cannot be prevented.though mr. shashikantha, learned counsel for respondent has also drawn my attention ..... electronic records produced for the inspection of the court and further reads, that such documents are called documentary evidence.section 39 as amended, enables not only of marking a document which forms part of a longer conversation or even a part of an isolated document and it contained in the part of electronic book or connected series ..... of the respondent to raise such untenable objection at this stage. it is submitted that the objection is not tenable and therefore, the petitioner is permitted to mark 4 cds.i have considered the objections raised on behalf of the respondent and the case and response of the petitioner.the word document described in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 10 2016 (HC)

N. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...

Court : Karnataka

..... "tourist circuit" is defined by rule 2 (h) of the tourist transport operators rules as meaning "all places of tourist interest situated in a state for which package tours are prepared and sold by the recognised tourist transport operator". under these rules, a tourist transport operator is required to obtain an authorisation certificate from the state ..... a permit referred to in sub-section (9) and (12) ; (ii) the fixation of the laden weight of the motor vehicle ; (iii) the distinguishing particulars or marks to be carried or exhibited in or on the motor vehicle ; (iv) the colour or colours in which the motor vehicle is to be painted ; (v) such other ..... contract, and in every case where such special permit is granted, the regional transport authority shall assign to the vehicle, for display thereon, a special distinguishing mark in the form and manner specified by the central government and such special permit shall be valid in any other region or state without the countersignature of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //