Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT69(CG)
ORDERDhirendra Mishra, J. 1. With the consent of the parties, the matter was finally heard at the admission stage itself.2. By this petition the petitioner has impugned the order dated 21-10-2008 of Annexure P-l whereby respondent No. 2-Director, Panchayat has allowed the revision petition of respondent No. 6 preferred against the order dated 4-10-2008 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Additional Collector, Raigarh.3. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that applications for appointment on the post of Aanganbadi Worker were invited by the Development Project Officer, Gram Panchayat Garhumaria, District Raigarh and the petitioner, respondent No. 6 and others submitted their applications. After scrutiny of applications, Gram Panchayat vide Annexure P-4 recommended name of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Aanganbadi Worker, however, respondent No. 4-Chief Executive Officer appointed respondent No. 6 as Aanganbadi Worker for Gram Panchayat Garhumaria. The Additional Collector, Ra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT79(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of the provision of Clause (m) of Sub-section (1) of Section 36 of Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 (for short 'the Adhiniyam'). The relevant provisions are extracted hereunder :'Section 36.- Disqualification for being office bearer of Panchayat :--36 (1) No person shall be eligible to be an office bearer of Panchayat who *** *** *** :(m) : has more than two living children one of whom is born on or after the 26th day of January 2001.(2) If any person having been elected (*** ***) as an office bearer of Panchayat--(a) subsequently becomes subject to any of the disqualification mentioned in Sub-section (1) and such disqualification is not removable or being removable is not removed (or becomes office bearer concealing his disqualification for it which has not been questioned and decided by any election petition under Section 122).*** *** *** ***He...
Tag this Judgment!