Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur panchayati raj act 1994 chapter ii gram sacha Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 308 results (0.041 seconds)

Veeresh Vs. The State of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... governed by provisions contained in chapter x of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993 ( act for short). ..... combined reading of article 243-o of the constitution of india and sections 15 and 171 of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993, makes it clear that the election to panchayat can be called in question only through an election ..... of karnataka & others member of zilla panchayat and also a voter of the constituency under dispute, have got locus standi to challenge the act of a public servant, who by his misdeeds has enabled an undeserving candidate to make use of a caste and income certificate issued by ..... an voter of dhannur-18, a constituency under bagalkot zilla panchayat, respectively, alleging that the income-cum-caste certificate issued by respondent no.4 tahasildar in favour of the respondent no.5, was a fraudulent and collusive act of 4th and 5th respondent, at the instance of a sitting mla, who is 11 date of judgment 04.04.2017 w.a.nos.101469-470/2016 c/w. ..... patil, learned government advocate, representing respondents no.1 to 4, in his arguments vehemently submitted that the very act of the appellants challenging the issuance of the caste-cum-income certificate in favour of the respondent no.5, is ..... sheelvant, advocate for r5) these appeals are filed under section4of the karnataka high court act, 1961 praying to set aside the order dated2110.2016 passed by the learned single judge in w.p.no.103198-103199/2016 by allowing the prayers made by the .....

Veeresh and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Prin ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... constitution is governed by provisions contained in chapter x of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993 ('act' for short). ..... a combined reading of article 243-o of the constitution of india and sections 15 and 171 of the karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act, 1993, makes it clear that the election to panchayat can be called in question only through an election petition, ..... panchayat, bagalkot and an voter of dhannur-18, a constituency under bagalkot zilla panchayat, respectively, alleging that the income-cum-caste certificate issued by respondent no.4 - tahasildar in favour of the respondent no.5, was a fraudulent and collusive act of 4th and 5th respondent, at the instance of a sitting mla, who is said to be the husband of the 5th respondent, challenged the said caste certificate in the writ petition nos.103198- 103199/2016 and writ ..... of the other appellants and further submitted that the appellant being a member of zilla panchayat and also a voter of the constituency under dispute, have got locus standi to challenge the act of a public servant, who by his misdeeds has enabled an undeserving candidate to make use of a caste and income certificate issued by him in contesting the election. ..... is clear that mere availability of an alternative remedy cannot take away the writ jurisdiction, that too in the cases like instant case, wherein the act of a public servant in issuing a caste certificate, which is said to be not proper, affects the health of the society. 22. .....

Sri Yellappa Basvani Tashildar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR3319; 2008(6)KarLJ650; 2008(4)KCCRSN326; 2008(5)AIRKarR245; AIR2008NOC2879

..... and functions of the taluk panchayat are enumerated in chapter viii of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993. ..... subject taken up for discussion by the petitioners does not fall within the ambit of the powers and functions of the taluka panchayat and is in fact outside the scope of section 141(2) of the act therefore, the state government was right and justified in holding that the petitioners had worked against the interest of the panchayat and also of the state while raising the issue which was not ..... in the instant case, the petitioners intended to do precisely what is stated hereinabove and when they were proceeded against by issuing notice alleging such acts on their part, they justified their actions and contended that it was the expression of their freedom of speech and expression, as a fundamental ..... . as regards the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that proceedings initiated under section 136 of the act against the adhyaksha of the taluka panchayat was illegal, it has to be stated that the adhyaksha of the taluka panchayat is also a member of the taluka panchayat and if he has committed misconduct in his capacity as such and ..... . establishment of local bodies such as gram panchayats, taluka panchayats and zilla panchayats has been done with the avowed purpose of establishing local self-governments to take the powers to the gram panchayat level so that each unit at the grass-root level will be in a position to find out their need and address the same by taking up .....

Mr.lingappa Goudoru Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as it pertains to reservation for zilla 12 panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk; (iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure - f ); (iv) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to consider the representation dated 05.04.2021 issued by the petitioner (produced as annexure - e ..... iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk panchayat 11 and that of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure- e ); and; (iiia) issue a writ of certiorari and quash the notification dated 24.03.2021 issued by respondent no.2 bearing no.rachua/8/tzp ..... connected writ petitions would toe the line of submissions in so far as they concern zilla panchayat and in so far as it concerns taluk panchayat would submit that section 121 of the act which deals with elected members and section 122 which deals with determination of elected members after each census would mean that a process of delimitation to be undertaken only after census figures are ..... chapter x of the act .....

Vishwanatha H M Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as it pertains to reservation for zilla 12 panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk; (iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure - f ); (iv) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to consider the representation dated 05.04.2021 issued by the petitioner (produced as annexure - e ..... iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk panchayat 11 and that of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure- e ); and; (iiia) issue a writ of certiorari and quash the notification dated 24.03.2021 issued by respondent no.2 bearing no.rachua/8/tzp ..... connected writ petitions would toe the line of submissions in so far as they concern zilla panchayat and in so far as it concerns taluk panchayat would submit that section 121 of the act which deals with elected members and section 122 which deals with determination of elected members after each census would mean that a process of delimitation to be undertaken only after census figures are ..... chapter x of the act .....

Sri.m.v.balaraj Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as it pertains to reservation for zilla 12 panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk; (iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure - f ); (iv) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to consider the representation dated 05.04.2021 issued by the petitioner (produced as annexure - e ..... iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk panchayat 11 and that of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure- e ); and; (iiia) issue a writ of certiorari and quash the notification dated 24.03.2021 issued by respondent no.2 bearing no.rachua/8/tzp ..... connected writ petitions would toe the line of submissions in so far as they concern zilla panchayat and in so far as it concerns taluk panchayat would submit that section 121 of the act which deals with elected members and section 122 which deals with determination of elected members after each census would mean that a process of delimitation to be undertaken only after census figures are ..... chapter x of the act .....

Sri Bheemayya Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... as it pertains to reservation for zilla 12 panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk; (iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkaballapur taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure - f ); (iv) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to consider the representation dated 05.04.2021 issued by the petitioner (produced as annexure - e ..... iii) issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to carry out the delimitation of the constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk panchayat 11 and that of zilla panchayat constituencies of chikkanayakanahalli taluk in accordance with the provisions of karnataka gram swaraj and panchayat raj act and the guidelines dated 15.09.2015 issued by respondent no.2 (produced as annexure- e ); and; (iiia) issue a writ of certiorari and quash the notification dated 24.03.2021 issued by respondent no.2 bearing no.rachua/8/tzp ..... connected writ petitions would toe the line of submissions in so far as they concern zilla panchayat and in so far as it concerns taluk panchayat would submit that section 121 of the act which deals with elected members and section 122 which deals with determination of elected members after each census would mean that a process of delimitation to be undertaken only after census figures are ..... chapter x of the act .....

B. Venkateshallu Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR3462; 1996(7)KarLJ607

..... section) is elected as a member of a taluk panchayat and he fails to resign his other seat already held by his (as mp, mla, mlc or member of municipality, municipal corporation, sanitary board, town board, zilla panchayat, gram panchayat or notified area committee) within 15 days from the date of notification of his election as a member of the taluk panchayat under section 133, his seat in the taluk panchayat will become vacant. ..... taluk panchayat commenced only on 4.5.1995, he had time to submit his resignation regarding the membership of the gram panchayat within 15 days from 4.5.1995; and as he submitted his resignation in regard to his seat in the muka gram panchayat well within 15 days from 4.5.1995, that is, on 6.5.1995 itself, he continues to be a member of the bellary taluk panchayat and his seat has not become ..... the third respondent however contends that his seat as a member of the taluk panchayat would have become vacant only if he had failed to resign his seat in the gram panchayat within 15 days from the date of commencement of the term of office as a member of the taluk panchayat; and as the five year term of office of the third respondent as a member of the bellary ..... to the said taluk panchayat were notified on 31.3.1995 under section 133 of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993 ('act' for short). ..... are members of muka gram panchayat in bellary taluk, having been elected on 22.2.1994. ..... chapter vii of the act deals .....

Mrs. Chikkamuniyamma Vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... motion of no confidence- annexure-a to contend that the remiss mentioned therein requires an opportunity of hearing to be extended to the petitioner, regard being had to sub section 4 of section 48 of the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, ( the act for short) without - 3- which, no confidence motion must fail. ..... if the members of the grama panchayat have not initiated action against the petitioner under sub-section 4 of section 48 of the act for persistent remiss, petitioner must be more than happy that the members have not sought her removal, but on the other hand have moved - 7- a no confidence motion ..... it is in this context that the learned single judge having examined the aforesaid provisions i.e, section 49 of the act and rule 3 of the rules held that the person holding the office of adhyaksha or upadhyaksha cannot invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india, ..... having noticed the aforesaid two statutory provisions, one under sub section 4 of section 48 of the act for removal of the adhyaksha or upadhyaksha for persistent remiss and the other being a motion of no confidence against adhyaksha or upadhyaksha under section 49 r/w rule 3 of the rules, it is crystal ..... raj (motion of no-confidence against adhyaksha or upadhyaksha of grama panchayat) rules, 1994, for short rules, provides for effectuating the substantive right given to the members under section 49 of the act ..... the gram panchayath, k.gollahalli, kengeri hobli, bangalore south taluk .....

H.C. Yatheesh Kumar and ors. Vs. the Karnataka Election Commission and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3323

..... the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation:in our constituent assembly this twenty-sixth day of november, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and give to ourselves this constitution'.under chapter iv of our constitution the directive principles of state policy, article 40 emphasises that the state shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to ..... achieve this object of 73rd amendment of the constitution the government of karnataka legislated the karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993 (for short 'act of 1993') providing a three tyre system i.e. ..... . for the reasons stated above, the following order:-1) writ petitions are partly allowed;2) we hold the karnataka panchayat raj (reservation of seats in taluk panchayats and zilla panchayts by rotation) rules, 1998 as ultra vires and void;3) the impugned notifications issued by the state election commission in sofar as it relates to allotment of reserved seats to ..... . since, we have held the rules 1998 as ultra vires to article 243-d of the constitution and section 162 of the act, 1993, the impugned notification relating to allotment of reserved seats to different constituencies issued by the 1st respondent election commission are ..... state election commission got prepared through satellite mapping a map showing the population and boundaries of every village, gram panchayat and taluks and the connecting roads, highways railway lines, etc ..... , gram panchayats, taluk .....