Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur hill areas district councils act 1971 section 31 committees Court: chennai Page 9 of about 83 results (0.100 seconds)

A.M. Shamsudeen and ors. Vs. the Dist. Judge and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1990)2MLJ461

..... which the high court claimed to exercise was, in substance, appellate, but the high court was not invested with the power either under the scheme or any law, to set aside the orders of the district judge exercising authority under the scheme merely because it thought that the order was vitiated on account of error in appreciation of evidence....so, i am not inclined to go into the merits or demerits of the cases on hand on the ..... paul pandian, the learned counsel argues that the findings of the learned district judge are perverse on the face of it, that the scheme under section 92 of civil procedure code will be considered as a decree, that though the court has acted under a decree, it acts as a civil court, and as such it does judicial function, that when executing a judicial function, it has to observe the principles of natural justice and that it has not been done in this ..... hereditary trustees shall hold office for life.c) the other trustees known as non-hereditary trustees shall be nominated for term of five years, by the district judge, west thanjavur under the schemes decree, from the muslim residents of the panchayat area of adiramapattinam other than members to the male line of the three branches of the founders mentioned in sub-clause (b). ..... commissioner of hills division assam : [1958]1scr1240 the same view expressed in the above mentioned decision was ..... commissioner of hills division, assam : [1958]1scr1240 (3) ..... of hills division : [1958]1scr1240 and it was pointed out by .....

Ramasamy Gounder Vs. Sivasubramanian

Court : Chennai

..... devaraj for respondents : mr.r.subramanian for mr.c.prakasam for r1 no appearance for r2 mr.c.selvaraj for mr.vijaraj for r3 judgment the above second appeal arises against the judgment and decree passed in a.s.no.61 of 2007 on the file of principal district court, coimbatore confirming the judgment and preliminary decree so far as the relief of partition is concerned and reversing the decree in respect of mesne profits passed in o.s.no.241 of 1999 on the file of sub court,, udumalapet.2. ..... since the 6th defendant got married on 3.9.1989, as per the amended provisions of section 29 of the hindu succession act, she is entitled to a share in the ancestral joint family property along with her ..... against the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2009 made in a.s.no.61 of 2007 on the file of principal district court, coimbatore confirming and modifying the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2007 made in o.s.no.241 of 1999 on the file of sub court, udumalapet for appellants : mr.s.v.jayaraman ..... the 6th defendant contended that he got married on 3.9.1989, therefore, under the hindu succession act, she should be construed as a member of the joint family, entitled to a share in ..... : yes internet : yes rj to 1.the principal district court, coimbatore. ..... appeal filed under section 100 c.p.c. ..... and 2 others) wherein, i had an occasion to hold that if a document is voidable, article 60(b)(ii)of the limitation act would apply and if the document is a void document then, article 65 of the limitation act would apply. .....

Mr.G.Balasubramanian Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... public notice dated 20.01.2011, published in the daily thanthi issued by the 3rd respondent inviting applications for the purchase of the proposed hig flats to be constructed by the respondents in puliyur village, kodambakkam division, chennai district, (behind raghavendra kalyana mandapam) and to quash the same and to consequently forbear the respondents herein from interfere with the ownership and possession of the writ petitioner in and over the land, comprised in t.s.no.16/3, ..... in satinder prasad jain s case, another bench of three judges had held that though award under section 11-a was not made within two years after the amendment act 68 of 1984 came into force, the title having been vested in the state, the notification under section 4(1) and declaration under section 6 do not get lapsed and non-compliance of statutory provisions does not have the effect of divesting the title of the land vested in ..... , tamilnadu housing board, k.k.nagar division, ashok nagar, chennai, the 3rd respondent herein, calling for applications for the purchase of the proposed hig flats to be constructed in puliyur village, kodambakkam division, chennai district and quash the same consequently, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents, not to interfere with the ownership and possession of the petitioner.2. ..... punjab and others, reported in 2003 (4) scc485 municipal council, ahmed nagar v. ..... no.816 industries dated 24.3.1971 in favour of another subsidiary company, shri rama vilas .....