Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: man queller Court: guwahati Page 1 of about 2,723 results (0.017 seconds)

Shri Adinath Chakraborty Vs. the State

Court : Guwahati

..... at that time it struck me that ratan's father is a man of abusive nature therefore he would rebuke him if he would take ratan to the shop, therefore i decided to take him to his house. ..... but in this territory a man is kept in segregation as a measure of punishment.. .....

Gauhati Bank Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Nath Majindar Barua and anr.

Court : Guwahati

deka, j.1. this rule was obtained by the gauhati bank limited against an order of the subordinate judge, upper assam districts at jorhat passed in miscellaneous claim case no. 42 of 1957 whereby the claim of the opposite party no. 2--assam co-operative apex bank limited, sibsagar town, was allowed in respect of a sum attached by the decree-holder bank in execution of a decree passed against rajendra nath majindar barua opposite party no. 1. the order itself is not very specific as to the amount under claim which has been allowed and accordingly there had been some confusion even as to the point to be decided.on a reference to the record and after hearing the learned advocates for the parties, we are satisfied that this amount in claim refers to the sum of rs. 2,742.53 naya paise in respect of which a claim was filed by the assam co-operative apex bank limited, sibsagar by an application dated 20-11-1957, for the purpose of precision, i quote below the order of the learned subordinate judge dated 20-11-1957 :'record put up today. a cheque no. 405028 for rs. 2,742.53 has been received from the ex-engineer, sibsagar dn. office to arrange to acknowledge the cheque by returning the hand receipt.keep the cheque in safe custody until necessary orders are passed.one claimant appears (assam co-operative apex bank ltd.) through lawyer and by a petition no. 1402 files claim against the attached amount of the j. d.put up in presence of the lawyers on the date already fixed (i.e. .....

Jiwan Chandra Pant Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

..... crpf (shri man singh rawat, addl. .....

Helen Ghosh Vs. Shri Babul Roy and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... but it does not preclude a man from claiming compensation on account of damage to property without sustaining bodily injury. .....

Smti Helen Ghosh Vs. Shri Babul Roy and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... but it does not preclude a man from claiming compensation on account of damage to property without sustaining bodily injury. .....

Radhabari Tea Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Mridul Kumar Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas579(Gauhati)

..... although it would be constitutionally possible for the company, in general meeting, to exercise all the powers of the company, it clearly would not be practicable (except in the case of one or two-man companies) for day-to-day administration to be undertaken by such a cumbersome piece of machinery. .....

Gokul Das Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1981CriLJ229

..... the court accepted the deposit considering the nature and gravity of the case, including the fact that the petitioner was a man from outside the state. ..... only one brijdas, claiming to be a man of banaras filed a petition stating that he deposited rs. ..... on a bail petition moved before him, the chief judicial magistrate by his order dated 3-3-1978 allowed the accused-petitioner to go on cash bail of rupees 8,000/- "as he is a man from outside the state". ..... 8,000/- in cash, he being a man from outside the state. .....

The Assam and Meghalaya State Road Transport Corporation, Gauhati Vs. ...

Court : Guwahati

..... it has been observed that in many states for want of judicial man power or other pathological causes the accident claim cases pend before the tribunal in heartless slowness. ..... in fact, the amount is no compensation, as the young man is a cripple living on charity, dependent on others and living a spiritless life. ..... , a semi-skilled labouring man working for gain @ rs. ..... he was a young man of 28 years a helper to mason (raj mistry). ..... the indubitable fact is that the left leg of a young man was amputated. ..... a man was made a cripple, but the corporation manned by human beings was devoid of human compassion and human feelings, fought the legal battle, as if it were a war. ..... the state owned corporation provided no aid, no assistance nor any helping hand to the lame young man, possibly because he was 'a labouring man'. ..... the young man escaped death but he is lifeless, living a deadly life. .....

Gokul Das Vs. the State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1981CriLJ229

..... the court accepted the deposit considering the nature and gravity of the case, including the fact that the petitioner was a man from outside the state. ..... only one brijdas, claiming to be a man of banaras filed a petition stating that he deposited rs. ..... on a bail petition moved before him, the chief judicial magistrate by his order dated 3-3-1978 allowed the accused-petitioner to go on cash bail of rupees 8,000/- 'as he is a man from outside the state'. ..... 8,000/- in cash, he being a man from outside the state. .....

Pradip Sharma Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

i.a. ansari, j. 1. this is an application made under section 482 cr.p.c. seeking direction from this court to the learned sessions judge, kamrup to dispose of sessions case no. 216(k)/2002, arising out of gr case no. 3808/2002, under sections 342/376 ipc registered against the accused petitioner. 2. this revision has raised an important question of law. for the purpose of disposed of this revision, the material facts leading to the present revision may, in brief, be stated as follows :- the accused-petitioner faced in sessions case no. 216(k)/2002 aforementioned trial in the court of learned additional sessions judge, kamrup, on the charges framed against the accused-petitioner under sections 342/376 ipc. as the accused pleaded not guilty to the charges so framed, the recording of evidence of prosecution evidence commenced and after recording the evidence of as many as four witnesses for the prosecution, the learned additional session judge, kamrup, got transferred. thereafter, on a petition made by the accused-petitioner himself, the learned sessions judge, kamrup, withdrew the case aforementioned to his own file and recorded the evidence of two more witnesses, namely, pw 5 (ha ahmed) and pw 6 (labanya kumar talukdar) both of whom are sub inspectors of police and investigating officers of the case. the learned sessions judge, kamrup, then, recorded the statement of the accused-petitioner under section 313 cr.p.c. 3. having realized that the withdrawal of the case by the .....