Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... i.e., after the alleged offences were committed, was in terms made retrospective by section 2 of the said ordinance which says that the act " shall be deemed to have been in force in vindhya pradesh from the 9th day of august, 1948" a date long prior to the date of ..... land grabbing or the determination of questions of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under this act and offences specified in chapter xiv-a of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, shall be tried only in a special court constituted for the area in which the land grabbed is situated; and the decision of the special court shall be final: provided that if, in the opinion of the special court, any application filed before it, ..... 121. petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 passed by the special court on ..... 'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ..... . babu pujari, aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru post, sringeri taluk, ..... india reported in (1991) 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!