Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: main memory Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 510 results (0.026 seconds)

Shiv Kumar and Another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... vitiates for the reason that they did not identify the accused persons on their memories and first impression of seeing them, but they did identify them after they had seen them in police custody ..... as stated by the supreme court, the main object of holding an identification parade, during the investigation stage, is to test the memory of the witnesses based upon their first impression about ..... of some days is not enough to erase the facial expressions of assailants from the memory of father and mother who have seen them killing their son. 54. ..... in other words, the main object of holding an identification parade, during the investigation stage, is to test the memory of the witnesses based upon first impression and also to enable the prosecution to decide whether all or any of them could be cited as eyewitnesses of ..... it was held that generally with lapse of time memory of witnesses would get dimmer and therefore the earlier the test identification parade is held it ..... therefore, the prosecution came with the 2 main circumstances- one of identification of the accused persons during the trial and also ..... that the fact that the injured witnesses had lost their son and daughter-in-law showed that there were reasons for an enduring impression of the identity on the mind and memory of the witnesses. 52. ..... able to identify the appellant shiv shankar at the identification parade, they would have certainly mentioned about them at the earliest point of time when his face was fresh in their memory. 47. .....

Vinod Vs. State of M P Now State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... in fact on account of her traumatic and tragic experience, the faces of the appellants must have got imprinted in her memory, and there was no chance of her making a mistake about their identity. 13. ..... in other words, the main object of holding an identification parade, during the investigation stage, is to test the memory of the witnesses based upon first impression and also to enable the prosecution to decide whether all or any of them could be cited as eyewitnesses of the crime. ..... sukalu ram was sent for medical treatment to district hospital, durg, from where, he was referred to sector 9, main hospital, bhilai and at about 7.00 p.m. .....

Rajesh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2559

..... kalki : air 1981 sc 1390, normal discrepancies in evidence are those which are due to normal errors of observations, normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental disposition such as shock and horror at the time of occurrence and these are always there however honest and truthful a witness may be material discrepancies are those which are ..... silent spectators during the whole short episode; actions were attributed to the chief participants of which not the slightest trace existed; and essential parts of the tragic-comedy were completely eliminated from the memory of number of witnesses.hence, the professor concluded: 'we never know, or imagine'. ..... the witnesses just cannot help in giving embroidery to a story, however, true in the main. .....

Ram Bai Vs. State of M.P. (Chhattisgarh)

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT117(CG)

..... proper manner, that is to say, in the formof questions and answers, and, as far as practicable, in the words ofthe maker of the declaration which depends upon oral testimonywhich may suffer from all the infirmities of human memory andhuman character; and (6) that in order to test the reliability of a dying declaration, the court has to keep in view, the circumstances like the opportunity of the dying man for observation, for example, whether there was .....

Rukman Bai Vs. Sukhman Bai

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... it must be ancient; but it is not of the essence of this rule that its antiquity must in every case be carried back to a period beyond the memory of man. .....

Vishal and Others Vs. Ramjee Son of Dinesh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... coming to the main and first substantial question of law formulated by this court, both the courts below have concurrently held, the transaction was permanent, pursuant to above transaction, late dinesh executed a work of permanent character, i.e. .....

Santoshi Das and ors. Vs. Gautam Meshram and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : II(2006)ACC596; 2007ACJ475

s.r. nayak, c.j.1. the dependants of the deceased have filed this appeal for more compensation.2. mr. verma, learned counsel for the appellants would contend that even taking the age of the deceased on the date of the accident as 45 years, as has been done by the motor accidents claims tribunal (in short, 'the tribunal'), the tribunal ought to have applied multiplier 15 and not multiplier 11 for assessing loss of dependency. the contention is well founded. if the age of the deceased was 45 years as on the date of accident, as per second schedule, the tribunal ought to have applied multiplier 15. it was also contended by mr. verma that tribunal is not justified in not awarding any compensation towards 'loss of love and affection' for the minor children. further, it was contended by learned counsel that what is awarded under the head 'loss of consortium' and 'loss to estate' are on lower side. here again, we find some force in the contention. even the compensation to be awarded by the tribunal under the conventional heads should not be static for all the time, because that compensation would also form part of the compensation. in other words, the compensation to be awarded by the claims tribunal under the conventional heads should reflect time and place and the steep fall in money value. in that view of the matter, we award a sum of rs. 20,000 towards 'loss of consortium' to the widow and rs. 20,000 towards 'loss of love and affection' to the minor children and another rs. 20, .....

Ramanyandas and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... on the contrary, the evidence of this witness only proves that the main operative reason for cruelty, if any, was that certain amount was taken as loan during marriage of this witness and he apprehended that his sister was being harassed because of non-repayment of loan to the appellant- ..... the aforesaid evidence led by the prosecution, as discussed above, only proves that the deceased-navdha was being harassed and mal-treated in many ways by her in-laws and that too mainly by her husband which was in connection with rs. .....

Kamal Narayan Khandelwal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT49(CG)

..... it is submitted that there are various persons against whose encroachments in front of main station and the circulating area, various orders evicting these persons were passed. .....

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Sughan Bai and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2007(2)MPHT65

orderd.r. deshmukh, j.1. heard on admission.2. this miscellaneous appeal is directed against an award dated 30-6-2006 passed by the learned 1st motor accidents claims tribunal, surajpur in claims case no. 71 of 2005 whereby compensation of rs. 1,43,000/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of application was awarded.3. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that since the appellant had already deposited a sum of rs. 50,000/- on the principle of no fault liability under section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act of 1988'), the appellant is absolved from the liability to deposit a further sum of rs. 25,000/-, as required under the provision to section 173(1) of the act of 1988. this argument is founded on two contentions. firstly, that under section 141(3) of the act of 1988, any amount deposited towards no fault liability under section 140 of the act of 1988 merges with the award and the liability to pay compensation is restricted only towards remainder. lastly, the learned counsel for the appellant placed reliance on a judgment rendered by the division bench of the high court of m.p. in oriental insurance co. ltd. v. gopal singh and ors. 1999 (2) mplj 541, wherein it was held that the high court may, in its discretion while entertaining the appeal, direct that the interim compensation already paid in the tribunal in a given case would be the requisite deposit.4. section 173(1) of the act reads as under:173. .....