Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... in proceedings relating to civil contempt, the main issue is about proper compliance with the directions of the tribunal. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... it may be apt for us to note that his written submissions running to 44 pages and the enclosures which are mainly copies of judgment number seventeen. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... subject in all the three years of his or her bachelors degree, and the second compressed or accelerated degree, by which he claims to have compensated for not having taken that subject as an elective subject in the main or regular bachelors degree course, and since these are single subject degrees, and passed in an accelerated manner compressed in one year, in one single subject, the candidate feels that he has not only made good ..... bench noted that the policy of the government is that the elective subject has been defined as one subject, which has been studied in all the three years of the degree course as a main subject, and any applicant who does not fulfil this requirement is not eligible, as per his educational qualifications. ..... have studied the subject concerned in all papers/years of graduation, and should have obtained the weighted average of at least 100 marks each, and that this definition would include the definition of main subject as adopted by some universities, and shall apply to all the orders of promotion as well as direct recruitment. ..... had contended that her subsequently acquired qualification in the additional subject (sanskrit) was not a part of her regular graduation degree course as a main subject, and, therefore, she may not be considered for eligible for appointment. 39. ..... of 1997 did not have any compulsory papers, but as per the marks sheet dated 12.09.1997, he passed in his three main subjects of hindi literature, economics and political science. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... it is seen that this is a 42 page report, and the summary of the main findings in part-iv of the report itself run into 4 pages, pin-pointing 14 proven irregularities in the process of recruitment in the govt. ..... it is seen that the implications of the orders of the honble high court have been discussed in the note sheets from page-32 onwards, mentioning the urgency to receive back the main file from the dopandt. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ185CAT
1. challenge by shri y.s. jafa, the applicant in this o.a., is directed against ministry of home affair order no. 16013/27/93-ips-ii dated 23/24.1.2001 where under he has been dismissed from service with immediate effect, in terms of article 311(2) (c) of the constitution of india, without holding any inquiry.2. mr. g.d. gupta, sr. advocate along with mr. v.k. rao for m/s sikri and co. represented the applicant while mr. k.k. sood, additional solicitor general along with mr. a.k. bhardwaj and mr. neeraj jain appeared for respondent nos. 1 and 2 -- union of india -- mr. nitin tambwekar learned counsel was present on behalf of respondent no. 3 -- state of maharashtra. written submissions were also filed by both the applicant and the respondents.3. the applicant, a directly recruited officer of indian police service (ips) of 1967 batch of maharashtra cadre had successively held a number of important and sensitive assignments like, superintendent of police, maharashtra; joint assistant director, intelligence bureau (ib), new delhi; assistant director, ib srinagar and new delhi; deputy commissioner of police, special branch, delhi police; deputy inspector general, border security force, srinagar and gurdaspur (punjab); deputy director, bsf (hqrs,). new delhi; ig, bsf kashmir frontier, srinagar and new delhi; director of prosecution, govt. of maharashtra, bombay; chief security and vigilance officer, maharashtra state road transport corporation, bombay (msrtc); inspector general, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
..... the applicant takes serious exception to the charge memo on variety of grounds, mainly being that there has been inordinate and unexplained delay in issuing the same, and that he would be seriously prejudiced in his defence at this distance of time. 2. ..... it is his case that his main duties and responsibilities were to ensure implementation of provisions of the customs act, 1962, and in case there was any violation of any laws at the time of import, he was empowered to take action for confiscation under section 11 of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
order dr. ramesh chandra panda, member (a): the applicant, shri ashok kumar aggarwal, a 1985 batch of indian revenue service (income tax) officer having put in 14 years of service was placed under suspension in 1999 subsequent to registration of two criminal cases against him and consequently getting arrested on two occasions once on 23.12.1999 and second time on 19.10.2000. however, the suspension order of the officer was quashed by this tribunal in oa no. 783/2000 on 17.01.2003 granting opportunity to the respondents to pass fresh order as appropriate based on facts of the case and the second suspension order was issued almost back to back in the sense that the revocation of suspension was passed on 25.04.2003 and on the same day a fresh suspension order was issued. since then the applicant has been continuing under suspension. it is the applicants case that against the said order he filed oa no. 1105/2003 which was dismissed. against the tribunals order he moved the honble high court of delhi and was allowed to withdraw the same on 11.08.2010 with liberty to approach the tribunal to challenge the continuing suspension on the basis of subsequent events. he, therefore, filed oa no. 2842/2010 which was decided on 16.12.2011. as such, as on date the applicant is under suspension for about 12 years i.e. from december, 1999. he has approached in different oas and mas in the past challenging the continuance of his suspension. the continuance of the suspension was lastly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. since issue raised in these four applications is common in nature, the same were heard together & are disposed of by present common order.2. by this application, nirmaljeet kaur, working in the office of deputy director general, computer centre, ministry of statistics, seeks direction to respondents to re-fix her pay in pre-revised scale of rs. 1600-2660 w.e.f. 1.1.1986 or the date of her joining as dpa, extending her the benefit of hon'ble supreme court judgment in chandraprakash madhavrao dadwa v. uoi and ors. , and this tribunal order dated 11.2.2002 in oa 1332/1999 d.k. sinha and 6 ors. v. uoi as upheld by hon'ble delhi high court. it was further contended that various juniors have already been allowed such benefits based on order dt. 9.2.2004 in oa no. 1080/2003, mrs. urmil jaitley & mrs. vijay goel v. uoi and ors. as well as order dated 30.8.2005 in oa 2914/2004, mrs.r.k. chadha and smt. saroj bala bhatnagar v. uoi and ors.3. in this oa, 7 applicants initially appointed on different posts, carrying different scales & dates i.e., computer, senior computer, statistical assistant, statistical investigator/programme assistant, later re-designated as data entry operator, grade a and b, data processing assistant grade a and b and programmer, who have retired during the period 1989 to 2000 seek direction to respondents to re-fix their pay in the edp pay scales by extending judgment of this tribunal in b.n. sharma and ors. v. uoi and ors. in oa 1741/1997 dated 13.10.1998, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
(oral) by honble mrs. meera chhibber, member (j): 1. applicant has challenged order dated 5.10.2005 (page 10) whereby she was removed from service after holding an enquiry. 2. it is stated by the applicant that she was served with a memorandum dated 24.6.2003 with the following allegations:- article of charge-1: that the said smt. kiran lata kaushik while working as receptionist entered in the office of public relations on 09.10.2002 unauthorisedly and took away a black diary intentionally wherein telephone number of all the members of parliament and the vips were written by the office of the public relations. such act has not only disturbed the smooth functioning of the p.r.o. office, and has taken away the black diary without permission of the officer-in-charge of the p.r.o. office. article of charge-2: that the said smt. kiran lata kaushik while working as receptionist was transferred/posted vide o.m. no.f.25-1/97-estt.i dated 27.11.2002 to work as receptionist at p.c. block, foyer under the supervision of the dy. chief security officer (do), but she has failed to comply with the orders of the competent authority. she has not reported for duty since then. this amounts to disobedience of orders on her part and unbecoming of an institute employee. article of charge-3: that the said smt. kiran lata kaushik while working as receptionist, even after her posting to work as receptionist at p.c. block, foyer under the supervision of dy. chief security office. she has written her .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. by virtue of this application, a challenge has been made to an order passed by respondents on 20.02.2004 imposing upon the applicant a minor penalty of reduction by three stages for a period of two years without cumulative effect as well as an order passed in appeal on 4.10.2004 upholding the punishment.2. briefly stated applicant, while posted at mathura as ticket collector, met with a road accident in the year 1991 with the result his left leg was imputed from the knee and an artificial leg was implanted. at that time, the applicant, who had been advised stationery and light duties continued to perform stationery duties in office without any regular duties pertaining to checking at the platform.applicant in the year 1995 was promoted as head ticket collector (for short htc) and also continued to perform light and stationery duties.one rajesh kumar, respondent no. 3, divisional traffic manager by a duty roster dated 11.10.2003 altered the duties of the applicant of regular duties of htc with a weekly roster on saturdays and changed to shift duties with working in 14-22 shifts.3. on 30.11.2003, while posted as htc to perform shift duties, applicant made an entry regarding visit of respondent no. 3 i.e.divisional traffic manager and further misbehaviour with him.4. a charge-sheet for minor penalty issued on 28.12.2003 alleged applicant's ignorance on duty in so far as one fruit vendor was found sleeping on the trolley; presence of 8 persons, wearing red clothes, in second .....
Tag this Judgment!