Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: maharashtra state commission for safai karmacharis act 1997 Court: central administrative tribunal cat guwahati Page 1 of about 1 results (0.080 seconds)

Subodh Kumar Pattnaik Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ262CAT

..... a 'good' or 'average' grading in the acr, though not per se adverse would assume the character of adverse remarks in the context of the requirement of 'very good' bench-mark to qualify for empanelment for promotion to junior administrative grade and above.the following observations in paras 13 and 14 of the said decision applies with equal force on the facts of the present case: "we have also noticed that the ..... year, then, after affording him the opportunity of representing against the downgrading in according with the principles of natural justice, if the downgrading is written, this decision, as well as the reasons for the same must be clearly recorded in the personal file of the reportee concerned.needless to say, this final decision should also be communicated to the reportee as otherwise the process will not fulfill ..... for four years out of five years the applicant must be held to have satisfied the said norms also for the reason that for all the years from 1997-98 to 2001-02 except for a fraction of the year 1997-98 the reviewing authority had assigned 'very good', but the accepting authority for one year had downgraded as 'good' without assigning any reason and for two years had downgraded as 'good' stating ..... as geologist (junior) on selection by the union public service commission in the year 1976 in the geological survey of india.he was ..... maharashtra ..... adverse remarks (in this case below the benchmark) cannot be acted upon by the dpc in the matter of selection of the .....