Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: maharashtra minor forest produce regulation of trade act 1969 Page 5 of about 2,787 results (0.172 seconds)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Yavatmal and ors. Vs. Divisiona ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom269; (1984)86BOMLR130; 1984MhLJ885

..... contentions of the parties we may at the outset note a few provisions of the act and the rules made there under, namely the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) rules, 1967) ('the rules' for short). ..... agricultural produce is so regulated in a given area, some machinery has to be provided for settlement of disputes between buyers and sellers regarding quality, weight, payment of any agricultural produce or any matter in relation to the regulation of marketing of agricultural produce in ..... in these two petitions is whether the power conferred under section 43 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing regulations) act, 1963 ('the act ' for short) can be exercised to revise the decision of the board constituted under section 10 of the act. ..... regard to the power and authority of the first respondent, namely the divisional joint registrar, co-operative societies, amravati, to interfere with the decisions of the board constituted under section 43 of the act, under which the first respondent has purported to exercise his power, does not operate on the decision of the said board since under it the state governm,ent can call for and examine the ..... trade of selling an purchasing such raw cotton is carried out in such markets and collection centres and there is no dispute that such trade is regulated by the provisions of the act and has to ..... out of eighteen members which constitute the market committee, ten are agriculturists and only three are from the trading community. .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Lamachand Baliram Chaudhari an ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ380Bom

..... 129 of 1984 under the provisions of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). 2. ..... 11 of the maharashtra state electricity board employees' service regulations, 1961, provides that the service of an employee in a purely temporary vacancy or as a trainee or apprentice or as understudy shall not count as service for seniority provided that if a person holding a temporary post without break is eventually confirmed in that post, the temporary service shall so count, except in the cases covered by regulation 10. ..... first respondent's case was really governed by the maharashtra state electricity board employees' seniority regulations, 1961. ..... 6 of the maharashtra state electricity board employees' seniority regulations, 1961, the seniority of directly recruited employees had to be maintained as per the order in the select list, notwithstanding the fact that the employee might have been already an employee of the board in some other capacity ..... 27 of the classification and recruitment regulations, 1961, provides that the seniority of persons selected for appointments shall be fixed in accordance with the board's seniority regulations, 1961, as amended from time to time ..... a conjoint reading of these regulations would show that the first respondent was entitled to be placed in the seniority list only on the basis that he was working in the service of the petitioner-board from the year 1982 as a permanent .....

Suresh S/O Kashiramji Durugkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(4)ALLMR277; 2000(4)BomCR194; 1999(3)MhLj374

..... the relevant portion is as under: 'employee who is punished under any of the punishment specified in rule 102 of the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) rules, 1967, shall be put at the bottom of the seniority list, even if he is seniormost.' 4. ..... when made a representation against this incident, the petitioner was told that regulation 46, governing the promotion provides that if he has been punished in a department proceeding, for the purposes of promotion, heloses seniority and will have to be placed at the bottom of seniority list ..... when the rule is not only understood in the aforesaid manner, but actually operated and acted in that manner, in our opinion, the grievance of double jeopardy has to be read on the basis ..... on the contrary, the said regulation 46 provides for additional requirement of the career being spotless and unblemished all throughout. 10 ..... of seniority as a consequence of punishment having been inflicted thereunder, the event of imposition of penalty under rule 102 if made use of in this manner, it would amount to punishing the petitioner once again for the same offence or delinquent's act in respect of which a punishment order was passed under rule 102. 5. ..... the agricultural produce market committee has clearly taken a stand as submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the ..... petitioner faced departmental proceedings and was meted out punishment under rule 102 of the service rules of the respondent-agricultural market produce committee. 2. .....

Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale Vs. the Scientific Cooperative Housing So ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR189; 2010(1)MhLj232

..... section 92 of the maharashtra cooperative societies act makes it clear that article 54 of the limitation act would apply to this proceeding. ..... (iii) he has fulfilled all other conditions laid down in the act, the rules and the by-laws; (iv) in case of a firm, company or body corporate, society registered under the societies registration act, 1860, a public trust registered under any law for the time being in force relating to registration of public trusts or a local authority, theapplication for membership is accompanied by a resolution autorising it to apply for such membership. 11. ..... rule 19 of the maharashtra co-operative societies rules, 1961 reads as follows 19. ..... neither party has produced a single notice of the meeting. ..... the question as to whether a disputant is or is not a member cannot be entertained by the cooperative court by virtue of the provisions contained in section 23 of the cooperative societies act. .....

Sindhu Education Society and ors. Vs. Kacharu Jairam Khobragade and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1995)ILLJ451Bom; 1994Mh.L.J.524

..... the provisions of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulations act, 1997 vis-a-vis the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 fell for consideration before this court in write ..... termination, not by way of an appeal under section 9 of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulations act, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'the' act of 1977), but by way of a complaint under the mrtu & pulp act. ..... no doubt, unfair labour practices act is also a special act enacted for the purposes stated in the preamble and is applicable only to industries as defined in section 3(7) of he said act, but compared to the act in question, it is a general act because it is available to all persons who are employees within the meaning of section 3(5) of the said act in all industries in the state of maharashtra and which come within the sweep of the definition of that word contained ..... complaint was opposed by the petitioner by a written statement, probably equally length where the petitioner claimed that their's was a institution of linguistic minority and has the constitutional protection minority and has the constitutional protection under article 30 of the constitution of india. ..... whole aspect, the labour court has allowed itself to be swept away and, in the end, it has found itself in such a situation which produces only confusion and nothing else. ..... 1/employees were produced in the labour .....

Prakash Jayawant Koli Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Indu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR198; 2008(1)BomCR196; (2007)109BOMLR2140; (2008)IILLJ917Bom; 2008(2)MhLj511

..... regions, agriculture, agricultural labour and gathering of minor forest produce and sale thereof is their avocation. ..... the company, on 7th november 2003, referred the caste certificate of the petitioner to the scrutiny committee, which had been constituted under the provisions of the the maharashtra schedule castes, scheduled tribes denotified tribes (vimukta jaties) nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act, 2000 and the rules framed thereunder.3. ..... he appeared before the scrutiny committee but according to the petitioner the the committee without following the due procedure prescribed under the regulations passed the impugned order dated 24th january 2007 which was subsequently communicated to the company and in turn the company issued the order on ..... from the main stream of national life and with their traditional moorings and customary beliefs and practices, they are largely governed by their own customary code of conduct regulated from time to time with their own rich cultural heritage, mode of worship and cultural ethos. ..... bench of the bombay high court in subhash ganpatrao kabade's case, that mahadeo koli was recognised for the first time in 1976 under amendment act, 1976, as scheduled tribe is not relatable to reality and an erroneous assumption made without any attempt to investigate the truth in that behalf ..... case and it was given to the vigilance cell as per the maharashtra act no. .....

Popcorn Entertainment Corporation, Through Is Proprietor Shri Nilesh G ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR52

..... this high court while hearing a public interest litigation questioning the allotment in favour of amey co-operative had passed some strictures against the state government, the state of maharashtra had filed the special leave petition in the supreme court seeking to expunge those strictures and in supreme court a specific stand had been taken by the learned advocate general of the state ..... sub-clause (a) of clause (1) of section 159 of the mrtp act, the cidco being new town development authority for the area comprised in the site of new bombay under sub-section (3a) of section 113 of the said act, has with the previous approval of the state government published in the maharashtra government gazette part iv0c on 26th july, 1979 the new bombay disposal of lands regulations, 1975 ('the regulations' for short). 5. ..... ashok sinha, the managing director of cidco in reply to the accountant general of maharashtra to an audit para on 21st april, 2006 (which is produced at pages 42 and 46 of compilation-1), has clearly justified the allotment both on the ground that no tender were invited and also on the ground that price was correctly charged ..... of not giving copy of the shankaran report submits that the issue has become infructuous and insignificant as the petitioners have produced details of the report and have argued the matter on that basis. ..... failure on the part of the petitioner to produce any valuation report to justify at which rate the allotment ..... petitioners have produced copy of ..... produced .....

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Environmental Acti ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR565; (2006)4CompLJ1(SC); JT2005(11)SC366; (2005)5SCC61; 2005(2)LC974(SC)

..... terms of section 37 of the maharashtra regional & town planning act, 1966, the state of maharashtra itself imposed a ban in 1996 on constructions on the ground that no final decision had been taken in that behalf and in that view of the matter there is absolutely no reason as to why the impugned order cannot be sustained in as much as the validity of regulation 58 has been questioned in the ..... following reliefs:'(a) for an appropriate writ, order or direction striking down the impugned order dated 20th march, 2001 (exhibit 'c', hereto) and consequent amendment to dc regulation 58, in particular, clauses a-6 and c-1 (5) of schedule 1 of the impugned order dated 20th march, 2001 as ultra vires the mrtp act, illegal, unconstitutional, void ab initio and non est;(b) for a writ of mandamus, or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ ..... the refusal of ex parte injunction would involve greater injustice than the grant of it would involve;(c) the court will also consider the time at which the plaintiff-first had notice of the act complained so that the making of improper order against a party in his absence is prevented;(d) the court will consider whether the plaintiff had acquiesced for sometime and in such circumstances it will not ..... we have passed this order having regard to the fact that the directions to produce documents have been passed without hearing the parties and without taking into consideration the hardship which may be faced by ..... two rival trade unions. .....

Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited and Others. Vs. Securitie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2013)1SCC1

..... (v) passing an order requiring any person who has violated or is likely to violate, any provision of the sebi act or any rules or regulations made thereunder to cease and desist for committing any causing such violation;(c) prohibiting manipulative and deceptive devices, insider trading, fraudulent and manipulative trade practices, market manipulation and substantial acquisition of securities and control;(d) crediting sums realized by way of penalties to the consolidated fund of india;(e) amending the composition of the securities appellate ..... course of natural events, human conduct and public and private business, in their relation to the facts of the particular case.illustrationsthe court may presume xxx xxx xxx(g) that evidence which could be and is not produced would, if produced be unfavorable to the person who withholds it;(h) that if a man refuses to answer a question which he is not compelled to answer by law, the answer, if given, would be unfavorable to him;xxx xxx xxxbut the court shall also ..... further, it was also pointed out that roc, kanpur and maharashtra had registered those rhps without any demur and, therefore, it was unnecessary to send it to sebi.21 ..... , to friends, associated group companies, workers/employees and other individuals associated/affiliated or connected in any manner with the sahara group companies.consequently, a rhp was filed on 6.10.2009 under section 60b of the companies act with the roc, mumbai, maharashtra, which was registered on 15.10.2009. .....

The Tata Power Company Limited, Rep. by B.J. Shroff Vs. Maharashtra El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... direct the respondent no.1 to comply with the provisions of the electricity act, 2003, the maharashtra electricity regulatory commission (state grid code) regulations, 2006 and scheduling and despatch code of 16.01.2008 and withdraw the letter dated 16.05.2010 and that 18.05.2010 issued by respondent no.1 deferring the open access granted to the respondent no.2 and refusing to ..... lie in their mouth to say even on 12.6.2010 after the government has made it clear before the high court that the two memoranda were not issued under section 11 or 37 of the act that it would still await further order of the government, and again say in this appeal that the government stand made through the learned advocate general before the high court does not bind ..... more particularly, the cross-subsidized consumers of m/s reliance infrastructure: i)m/s tpcs ( generation) obligation to use its generation capacity ( of specified units) to supply power at regulated/ reasonable rates to distribution licensees of mumbai on priority and not to take advantage of its dominant position in the absence of a ppa with m/s reliance infra to trade power, divert power to tpc (distribution) or to offer power to m/s reliance infra at higher rates, thereby adversely affecting the consumers of m/s reliance infrastructure, ii)m/s ..... this letter has been produced before this tribunal and there is no valid answer to the ..... cane commissioner of bihar an ors, 1969 (1) scc 308, the facts were not absolutely different from the ..... 1969 .....