Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... on its earlier decision in ibrahimpatnam taluk vyavasaya coolie sangham v/s k.suresh reddy ( (2003) 7 sc667 in which in relation to section 50-b(4) of the andhra pradesh (telangana area) tenancy and agricultural land act, 1950 providing for suo motu power, it was held that in absence of necessary and sufficient particulars pleaded as regards fraud and the date or period of discovery of fraud and more so when the ..... deity is a minor in perpetuity, but being a juristic person, has a judicial status with the power of suing or being sued under the provisions of the hindu minority and guardianship act, 1956, immovable property of minor cannot be sold without the permission of the court and hence the deity lands cannot be alienated except for legal necessity after obtaining the permission of the court.46. ..... 'kastkar' against the suit lands could not 13 be treated as entry of 'khudkasht' envisaged in clause (i) of the inclusive part of the definition of 'khudkasht' in section 5(23) of the rajasthan tenancy act, especially when it was not the case of the appellant that after the execution of the mortgages the defendant mortgagee had parted with the possession of the mortgaged property in favour of the appellant and had ..... raised in the present reference was rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kalanka devi sansthan v/s the maharashtra revenue tribunal nagpur and ors. ..... khudkast land the right, title and interest of the khatedar in his jagir lands including the forests, trees, fisheries etc. .....
Tag this Judgment!