Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madras area Page 8 of about 326,006 results (0.263 seconds)

Mar 20 2014 (HC)

Kakarla Rosenna and Other Vs. Thammineni Narasappa and Other

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... boy from one family to other family, datta homam and any other minor ceremonies and of which the physical act of giving and receiving of essentialities though not datta homam particularly of the madras area vide decision singamma33 and other minor ceremonies and the physical act of giving and receiving absolutely necessary to the validity of adoption is not only of in all casts of hindus including sudras and ..... rangappa (husband fo narayanamma 1st plaintiff in the suit) as her illatom son-in-law having affiliated by illatum adoption by giving half share in the property as per custom and usage prevalent in their area and other half should go to her daughter narayanamma (1st plaintiff) and since then rangappa and his wife narayanamma were living in the house of mangamma and thus it is not 1st plaintiff narayanamma ..... as per paras 458 and 459 of mulla supra, pages 784 to 789 of the parts of madras state (presidency) in particular concerned to the place of anantapur by then was under erstwhile madras composite state, a widow cannot alone adopt without authority from her husband unless there is express permission in the life time of her husband to adopt by her or he was separated from ..... arrived including from the contentions raised in the grounds of revision for saying the area is drought hit or with no cultivation in the lands, there is no ..... the head illatum son-in-law by custom of affiliating the son-in-law and giving him a share as per old madras presidency to which the state of a.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 1984 (HC)

Gundappa Achari Vs. Seshappa Upadhyaya

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR283; 1985(1)KarLJ362

..... the mother also was not in law then prevailing in madras area, entitled to get any share in the property of her son.. ..... much earlier to the said madras act coming into force with effect from 26-11-1946. ..... under the madras law as it stood then, the widow had no share at all in the property left by her husband. ..... therefore sarasamma, the widow of subraya aksali was not entitled in law to get the benefit under the said madras act. ..... the hindu womens' right to property act, 1937, was amended by madras act no. ..... thus he claimed permanent tenancy rights not only in the suit property but also in the western 8 cents of area.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 1990 (HC)

Dr. Mary Sheila Vs. Dr. Vincent Thamburaj

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1991Mad180; II(1992)DMC497

..... the conclusion reached by the full bench on the above question is as follows :--'after the constitution of the family court for the madras area, the original jurisdiction of the high court in respect ofmatters that may fall under the explanation of s. ..... judgment of the full bench, we find that the question referred to the full bench for consideration was (as set out by the full bench) as follows :'whether after the constitution of the family court for the madras area, the original jurisdiction of the high court in respect of matters that may fall under the explanation to s. ..... the defendant, though received summons from the principal family court at madras, chose to remain ex parte and consequently, the court was left with no other option but to decide the matter in his absence. ..... it cannot be disputed that the principal family court, madras, which has decided the suit is one established under s. ..... thomas basilica at madras on 3-4-1986. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1967 (HC)

Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Lyons Range Charge a ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1967]20STC345(Cal)

..... . the supreme court was of the view that the contract of sale was completely carried through within the madras area itself, where the respondents had received the price and the cotton bales were delivered to the buyers; the movement outside the madras state was by the buyers themselves after the property in them had passed to them; and the sales were not sales in the course of inter-state trade ..... has held that the property in the goods did not pass during the movement of the goods from one state into another by transfer of documents of title, and the movement of the goods from the madras state to places outside the state was not the result of any covenant or incident of the contract of sale ..... , has explained what is 'incidental to the contract' in these words :the next question that arises is whether the movement of axle-box bodies from belgium into madras was the result of a covenant in the contract of sale or an incident of such contract ..... but before we come to the supreme court case it is worthwhile referring to a decision of the madras high court in bengal corporation private ltd. v ..... .; the goods would be shipped to the madras port; but before shipment a nominee of the buyer should inspect the goods to satisfy himself whether they were in accordance with the ..... the manufacturers consigned the goods by ship to the assessee under bills of lading and the goods were cleared at the madras harbour and then despatched for delivery to the southern railway in madras and mysore.18 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 1968 (HC)

Pakula Majhi and ors. Vs. Subhadra Bhotruni

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1969Ori3; 34(1968)CLT1021

..... 1952 orissa 307 which was again a case of adoption, it was held by a division bench of this court that, 'in the absence of proof of any valid change of law, the oriyas of ex-madras area continue to be governed by the madras school of law in matters relating to adoptions. ..... the plaintiff is not a bandhu according to the benaras school of hindu law which is prevalent in orissa, she is a bandhu according to the madras school of hindu law which in this case must govern the parties, who belong to the district of koraput which once formed a part of the madras presidency and in the absence of any evidence to show that the parties, after 1936 when koraput district became part of the orissa state ..... over and above these female heirs, certain other female heirs have been recognised in madras from time to time like a son's daughter, ilr 14 mad 149, daughter's daughter, ilr 15 mad 421 and brother's sons' daughter, air 1940 mad 545 although some of these were not ..... part of the orissa state since 1936, the law applicable to the parties must be deemed to be the benaras school of hindu law which does not recognise a female bandhu; and even if it is held that the madras school of hindu law governs the case there is no instance in madras where a father's brother's daughter has been recognised as bandhu. ..... it was held that under the hindu law as administered in the madras presidency, female bandhus are entitled to come in after the male bandhus are exhausted, provided they satisfv the other conditions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1951 (HC)

Nitya Gauda Vs. Mongala Bagdefia

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1953Ori61; 19(1953)CLT92

..... the date of the grant of the inam, information on the question as to whether the inam was included in the assets of the zamindary or excluded therefrom.this question is not difficult for determination in an individual case arising in the madras or ex-madras area, because, almost invariably all inams that were excluded from the assets of the zamindary and in which the government had kept to themselves the ultimate right of reversion, were in fact systematically dealt with by the ..... it follows that since the land is a ryoti land already above shown, the inamdar would come within the purview of the word 'landholder' as defined in the madras estates land act, unless the original grant made by the zamindar to the original grants shows clearly that the grant was nothing more than a grant to a person to cultivate it on a perpetual favourable rent and as an ..... if the suit-land is a dana inam, the only relevant question that arises for consideration, in such cases, under the madras estates land act, is whether it is an inam which continues to be a part of the assets of zamindary so as to make the inam a part of the estate of the main land-holder, or whether it is outside the assets of the zamindary, the ..... if he meant to find that the plaintiff was a 'landholder' within the meaning of that term, in the madras estates land act, but that the suit-land was his private-land, this finding would not bring his case within the above exception, because the defendant' would then be a tenant under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1964 (HC)

Mahadeb Panda and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1964Ori235; 30(1964)CLT359

..... panda however contended that the, abolition of the hereditary village offices in the ex-madras areas of ganjam and koraput districts were not done for a 'public purpose' and ..... the right of a minor to be entered as the holder of a hereditary village office flows from his right of descent as provided in the last sentence of section 6(1) of the madras act and it was in consequence of this right that section 10(3) of that act provided for the registration of the minor as the heir of the last holder of the office, and directed the ..... state of andhra pradesh, air 1961 sc 564, where their lordships held that section 6(1) of the madras act in so far as it makes a discrimination on the ground of descent only, is void being violative ..... fanda urged that under the provisions of the madras act 3 of 1895 minors whose names were entered as holders of hereditary village offices by virtue of section 10(5) of that act were not declared to be 'holders of village offices' for the purpose of the ..... three former ex-village officers of ganjam district, challenging the constitutional validity of the orissa hereditary village offices (abolition) act (orissa act 12 of 1962), by which the madras hereditary village offices act 1895 (madras act 3 of 1895) was repealed. ..... while repealing the madras act, the orissa legislature, in section 6 of the orissa act 12 of 1962, provided for some relief to those village officers whose services were dispensed with in consequence of the abolition of their offices clause (1) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1976 (SC)

State of Mysore and ors. Vs. K. Chandrasekhara Adiga and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC853; (1976)2SCC495

..... it was further stated that the assignment of government lands was governed by land grant (madras area and bellary district) rules, 1960 and not by the madras boards standing order.10. ..... it held that the as signment of kumki lands is not re gulated by the grant rules, 1960, but by the madras board's standing orders which constitute 'a complete and exhaustive law with regard to kumki lands. ..... these rights though described as 'privileges' in the standing orders of the madras board of revenue and the rules framed under section 26 of the madras forest act, are rights of 'property' within the contemplation of articles 19 and 31 of the constitution. ..... nettar has not shown us any copy of the madras land grant rules 1960 which according to him, govern the assignment of kumki land also. ..... question whether these standing orders have the status of a 'law' or of mere administrative rules because substantially similar provisions, which are admittedly statutory in character, have been made by the rules framed under section 26 of the madras forest act. ..... the rights of kumkidars in respect of kumki lands and the grant of such lands for occupation are matters dealt in the orders of the board of revenue, madras. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1972 (HC)

B. Basavangoud Rachanagoud Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and District Re ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1973Kant11; AIR1973Mys11

..... there is no other rule requiring the stamp vendors to execute any agreement similar to the one that was in vogue in the madras area as per the provisions of board standing orders 76 end 77. ..... the petitioner took the stand that after the coming into force of the mysore stamp act, 1957, the board standing orders of the madras were not applicable and that therefore, the petitioner was not under an obligation to execute an agreement as demanded by the prescribed authority. ..... high court government pleader, found it difficult to maintain that the matter pertaining to grant of licence to stamp vendors is still governed by the board standing orders of madras which were in force in the district of bellary till the coming into force of the mysore stamp act, 1957. ..... authority, namely, the assistant commissioner of hospet insisted that the petitioner should execute an agreement in the prescribed form not to do any other business, as required by board standing orders 76 and 77 that were prevailing in the state of madras when bellary became part of the new state of mysore. ..... the indian stamp act was amended in madras by the madras legislature which was in force in the districtof bellary continued to be operative until the mysore stamp act. ..... the district of bellaryformerly formed part of the then stateof madras and became part of the part bstate of mysore somewhere in the year3953. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 1984 (HC)

Visvarama Hotels Ltd. Vs. Anjuman-e-imamia

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1983KAR223; 1984(2)KarLJ185

..... vimla as the plaintiff for various reliefs in relation to several propertiescompendiously called as 'nelliyadi beedu' or dharmastala, she had valued her suit at a particular sum and had paid certain court fee in accordance with the madras court fees and suits valuation act, 1955 which was then in force in the district of south kanara, now called as dakshina kannada, a part of old madras area of the new state of mysore, now called as karnataka. ..... 'the act, a uniform act enacted by the new state, is virtually a re-enactment of the madras act and, therefore theprinciples stated in sri rathnavarmaraja's case continue to govern the question. ..... our attention has not been invited to any provision of the madras court fees accuracy otherstatute which enables the defendant to move the high court in revision against the decisions of the court of first instance on the matter of court fee payable in a plaint. ..... but, counsel for the defendant says that by act 14 of 1955 enacted by the madras legislature which applied to the suit in question. ..... the defendant challenged the order made by this court on the second occasion before the supreme court complaining that the court fee paid by the plaintiff on her suit under the madras act was grossly insufficient. ..... ramaswamy of madras bar, n. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //