Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 section 40 arrears of taxes Sorted by: recent Court: uttaranchal Page 2 of about 13 results (0.050 seconds)

S.S. Bedi S/O Shri Mal Singh Vs. State of U.P (Now State of Uttarakhan ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act 2000 (central act 29 of 2000) for their disposal ..... is proved in respect of offences punishable under section 120b, 409, 471/465 i.p.c and one punishable under section 5(1)(c) read with section 5 (2) of prevention of corruption act 1947.12. ..... cashier and dhrampal for their trial in respect of offences punishable under section 120b, 409, 468, 471 of i.p.c and one punishable under section 5(2) read with section 5(1)(c) of prevention of corruption act 1947. ..... and two others were convicted under section 409, 120b, 471 and 461 of indian penal code 1860 (for short i.p.c) and one punishable under section 5(1)(c) read with section 5(2) of prevention of corruption act 1947. ..... , 409 of i.p.c, section 5(1)(c) read with section 5(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1947, section 471 read with section 465 of i.p.c, against accused/appellant s.s ..... 000/- under section 5(1)(c) read with section 5(2) prevention of corruption act 1947. ..... rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year 5(1)(c) read with section 5(2) of prevention of corruption act, 1947. ..... 10,000/- under section 409 of i.p.c, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year on under section 471 read with section 465 of i.p.c ..... this appeal, preferred under section 374 of code of criminal procedure, 1973, (for short ..... rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under section 471 read with section 465 i.p.c. ..... separate charge was framed against co accused dharampal in respect of offences punishable under section 120b, 409/109 i.p.c.. .....

Vipul and ors. Vs. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand)

Court : Uttaranchal

..... 200/- (as against accused vinay and nikhil) under section 25 of arms act; and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and fine ..... but also in respect of 25 arms act (as against accused vinay and nikhil), and that of one punishable under section 4/25 of arms act (as against accused vipul, mahesh and sadhu ..... in respect of offences punishable under section 25 of arms act and 4/25 of arms act against the five accused. ..... of the convicts vipul, sadhu and mahesh has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under section 4/25 of the arms act, and directed to pay fine of rs. ..... of the convicts vinay and nikhil has been further sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under section 25 of arms act, and directed to pay fine of rs. ..... 1991, whereby accused/appellants, namely vinay, nikhil, vipul, sadhu and mahesh have been convicted under section 399, 402 of indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as i.p.c. ..... , and under section 25 and 4/25 of the arms act, on the sole testimony ..... 1989 against mahesh (all the three in respect of offence punishable under section 4/25 of arms act) were registered. ..... act, 2000, (central act ..... 1989 against accused nikhil (both under section 25 of arms act); crime no. ..... punishable under section 25 and 4/25 of the arms act. ..... section 25 of the arms act. ..... the parties, the trial court found all the five accused guilty not only in respect of charge of offence punishable under section 399 and 402 of i.p.c. ..... 29 of 2000), for their .....

State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand). Vs. Jai Bhagwan, and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act, 2000, (central act no. ..... 185 of 1997, whereby said court has acquitted the respondents jai bhagwan and chatur narain, of the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as i.p.c. ..... 1) this appeal, preferred under section 378 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as cr.p.c ..... in the above circumstances, this court is of the view that the trial court has committed no illegality in holding that the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... after hearing the parties, the trial court found that the prosecution has failed to prove the charge against either of the two accused, and acquitted them of the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... oral and documentary evidence was put to the accused under section 313 of cr.p.c. ..... after hearing the parties, the trial court (judicial magistrate, haridwar) on 10.07.1992, framed two separate charges one against jai bhagwan sharma for criminal misappropriation of public money, punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... (accused ramakant was enlisted as a witness, as no offence is said to have been made out against him).4) the magistrate, on receipt of the charge sheet, provided necessary copies to the accused, as required under section 207 of cr.p.c. ..... after investigation, police submitted charge sheet against accused / respondents jai bhagwan and chatur narain, for their trail in respect of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. .....

Daya Ram Sharma S/O Shri Het Ram Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Smt. Jai ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act, 2000 (central act 29 of 2000), for its disposal.5. ..... learned additional sessions judge, udham singh nagar, to whom the case was transferred, framed charge of offence punishable under section 304 of i.p.c against the accused jai rani (present respondent no. ..... 184 of 1999 this revision was filed before allahabad high court on 3.11.2000, from where it is transferred to this court under section 35 of the u.p. ..... this revision is directed against judgment and order dated 14.09.2000, passed by additional sessions judge, udham singh nagar, in sessions trial no. ..... accordingly, accused jai rani was acquitted of the charge under section 304 of i.p.c. ..... the oral and documentary evidence was put to the accused under section 313 of cr.p.c. ..... it appears that after giving necessary copies as required under section 207 of cr.p.c. ..... -7 sub-inspector, ganga singh, said officer after completing investigation submitted charge sheet against accused jai rani (wife of the deceased) for her trial in respect of offence punishable under section 304 of i.p.c. ..... after five months of the incident the complainant made a report to the police authorities but no action was taken where after he moved an application under section 156(3) of cr.p.c. ..... 2) jai rani from the charge of offence punishable under section 304 of i.p.c.2. .....

Manohar Chandra Upadhayay S/O Sri Madhu Sudan Upadhayay Vs. State of U ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganisation act, 2000. ..... in the light of the aforesaid, the posting of the petitioner as a junior clerk pursuant to the order of the deputy director of the government of uttar pradesh dated 16th august, 2004 could not have been issued nor could the petitioner's representation be rejected on this ground. ..... beena pandey, the learned standing counsel for the state of uttar pradesh and sri subhash upadhayaya, the learned brief holder for the state of uttarakhand.2. ..... the deputy director of the government of uttar pradesh had no authority to pass an order against the petitioner, who was not their employee. ..... , lucknow dated 16th august, 2004 has not been questioned or challenged by the petitioner, this court is of the opinion that the said order is a void and a nonest order simple because the state government of uttar pradesh through its deputy director had no jurisdiction to revert the petitioner, who is an employee of the state of uttarakhand and was no longer an employee of the state of uttar pradesh. ..... this fact has been clearly admitted by the learned standing counsel for the state of uttar pradesh.7. ..... of junior clerk in the year 1982 in the office of the assistant director, ganna kishan sansthan evam prashikshan kendra, sahjahanpur and from time to time, the petitioner was transferred to several places in the state of uttar pradesh. ..... on 09th november, 2000, the state of uttaranchal, now known as uttarakhand, was created on the basis of the u.p. .....

Sharif S/O Chuttan Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganisation act, 2000, for its disposal ..... 15 of 1992, whereby appellant-sharif has been convicted under section 302 of indian penal code, 1860 (herein after referred as i.p.c), and sentenced to imprisonment for life and also directed to pay fine of ..... this appeal, preferred under section 374 of code of criminal procedure, 1973 (herein after referred as ..... accused/appellant sharif is set aside and he is convicted under section 304 parti of i.p.c. ..... the circumstances, we are inclined to accept the contention of learned amicus curiae that the offence found to have been proved on the record is the one punishable under section 304 part-i of i.p.c. ..... all these facts together, it is argued by him that even if the testimony of the eyewitnesses is taken to be true, this makes a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under section 304 part-i of i.p.c. ..... conviction and sentence, recorded by the trial court in respect of the offence punishable under section 302 i.p.c. ..... trial court after hearing the parties, found accused sharif guilty of charge of offence punishable under section 302 i.p.c. ..... iiird additional sessions judge, nainital, to whom the case was transferred, after hearing the parties on 22.07.1992, framed charge of offence punishable under section 302 i.p.c. ..... magistrate, on receipt of charge sheet, after giving necessary copies, as required under section 207 cr.p.c. ..... after death of the injured, the case was converted into the offence punishable under section 302 i.p.c. .....

Shri Dutt Ram (Since Deceased) (Smt. Kalawati Devi W/O Late Dutt Ram a ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act, 2000 (central act 29 of 2000), for its ..... suit filed by the plaintiff stands dismissed for specific performance, however, in view of provisions contained in section 22 of the specific relief act, 1963, it is directed that the defendant shall pay rs. ..... in view of section 46 of the indian contract act, 1872, where no time for performance of contract is specified, it is required to be performed within a ..... so, the agreement dated 02.12.1964, which is sought to be specifically enforced by the plaintiff must have been got registered under section 17 of the registration act. ..... --------------------------------------------------------------the aforesaid provision contained in the schedule of the limitation act, 1963, has two limbs-the first provides period of three years from the date fixed for the performance, and second when no period prescribed, the period of three years from the ..... this appeal, preferred under section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.1988, passed by district judge, almora, in civil ..... that the defendant paid the amount of arrears of rent amounting rs. ..... on the basis of the so-called agreement dated 02.12.1964 and what is the nature of the document, which is referred as the agreement, and whether the suit is barred by limitation?this appeal is received by transfer under section 35 of u.p. ..... of the schedule of said act reads as under:---------------------------------------------------------------54. .....

Kumaon Motor Owners' Union Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and Ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ26UC

..... reorganization act, 2000 (central act no. ..... the writ petition is received by this court under section 35 of the u.p. ..... 4 to the labour court, and industrial dispute was referred on june 23, 1983 under section 4-a of the u.p. ..... affidavit is the certificate dated of march 16, 1988, issued by the petitioner's executive director stating that the age of retirement in the petitioner's establishment is 58 years, and the employees are entitled to the benefits of the provisions of gratuity act on completion of said age. ..... industrial disputes act, 1947, which was registered as adjudication case no. ..... -540 in which it has been laid down that the employees are bound by the standing orders of the employer regarding their conditions of service, if the same are certified under the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946. ..... 29/2000), for its disposal.5. ..... 3 passed on november 14, 1977, by the board of directors, in which it is provided that the employees who have completed 55 years of age may also be benefited under the gratuity act.7. .....

Mansha Ram Payal and anr. Vs. Dr. Ved Prakash and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2010Utr14

..... before further discussions, this court thinks it just and proper to mention that section 15 of the indian easements act, 1882, provides as to how right of easement can be acquired by way of prescription. ..... and hearing the parties found that it is not proved on the recod that the plaintiff had been using the disputed land as rasta land for more than 20 years peacefully and openly as required under section 15 of indian easements act, 1882, and dismissed the suit. ..... reorganization act, 2000 (central act 29 of 2000) for its disposal.6. ..... this appeal, preferred under section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29-8-1988, passed by first appellate court (second additional district judge, dehradun), in civil appeal no. ..... court on 14-10-1988, where it was admitted on following question of law:whether the easementary right accrues to the plaintiff to discharge the dirty water (sewage) of his house on other person's land?the appeal is received by transfer under section 35 of u.p. .....

Daulat Ram (Deceased by L.Rs.) and anr. Vs. Gopal Krishna Balodi and o ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2010Utr9

..... reorganisation act, 2000 (central act no. ..... this appeal, preferred under section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and order dated 20-12-1994, passed by district judge, pauri garhwal, in civil appeal no. ..... counsel for the respondents drew attention of this court to the judgment and order dated 14-7-1998, passed by assistant collector, kotdwar, garhwal, whereby said revenue authority has declared the rights of the plaintiffs under section 229 b of u.p. ..... whether the defendants are entitled to get special costs from the plaintiffs under section 35-a of the c.p.c.?5. ..... zamindari abolition and land reforms act, during the pendency of this appeal. ..... the appeal is received under section 35 of u.p. ..... 29 of 2000), for its disposal.6. .....