Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 section 40 arrears of taxes Court: uttaranchal Page 2 of about 13 results (0.049 seconds)

Nov 06 2001 (HC)

Uma Shankar and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2002)1UPLBEC11

..... reorganisation act contains provisions under section 78, which reads as under :'78 ..... reorganisation act ..... service commission as to the work done by the commission in respect of any period prior to the appointed day shall be presented under clause (2) of article 323 to the governors of the states of uttar pradesh and uttaranchal, and the governor of the state of uttar pradesh shall, on receipt of such report, cause a copy thereof together with a memorandum explaining as for as possible, as respects the cases, if any, where the advice of the commission was not accepted, the ..... reorganisation act, three terms have been used and defined ..... every person who becomes the chairman or other member of the public service commission for the state of uttar pradesh on the appointed day under sub-section (2), shall- (a) be entitled to receive from the government of the state of uttar pradesh conditions of service not less favourable than those to which he was entitled under the provisions applicable to him. ..... re-organisation act, 9th november, 2000 was fixed as the appointed day, on which the act came into force and the state of uttaranchal came into existence ..... (cases in which recommendations accepted but formalities not completed prior to 9.11.2000)w.p. no. ..... of recommendations, in few cases all the formalities were completed prior to the appointed day and in few cases the formalities were not completed prior to the appointed day.cases in which all formalities completed prior to 9.11.2000 :1. w.p. no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 2001 (HC)

Vijay Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2002)1UPLBEC3

p.c. verma and m.c. jain, jj. 1. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after appointed date, he initially opted for uttar pradesh, but after re-thinking over the matter, the petitioner withdrew the first option and has opted for uttaranchal. but despite his second option, he is being relieved for uttar pradesh though no final allocation has been made as yet by the government of india. under the u. p. reorganisation act, final allocation is to be made by the government of india.2. therefore, till final decision is taken by the government of india as per section 73 of the u. p. reorganisation act, the petitioner shall not be compelled to go and join in the state of u. p. if he has already been relieved, he shall be allowed to continue, and any order passed in connection with his relieving shall be inoperative.3. the petition is disposed of accordingly.

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2012 (HC)

The State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttaranchal (Sidcul) a ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganisation act, 2000 against the impugned awards dated 19.9.2003, 13.2.2004, 31.7.2003, 17.1.1998, 17.10.2003, 17.10.2003, 17.10.2003, 19.9.2003, 19.9.2003, 21.7.2003, 31.12.2003, 9.6.2003, 29.3.2003, 17.10.2003, 9.6.2003, 13.2.2004, 19.4.2003, 4.9.2003, 24.12.2003, 17.11.2003, 27.8.2003, 24.12.2003, 13.2.2004 ..... of the ratio of apex court judgment (supra), although the said judgment (supra) has been rendered in case of daily wagers wherein the workman had worked for more than 240 days and provision of section 25-f of industrial dispute act was not complied, however, in the case at hand the demerger proceedings of both the units is pending, therefore, the court is of the opinion, instead of their reinstatement, the respondents/workmen are entitled ..... reorganisation act to manage these two units belonging to state of uttarakhand, therefore, in my view, the proceedings were rightly initiated against the petitioner for execution ..... reorganization act, 2000, vide its office memorandum dated 23.11.2004, appointed sidcul as a nodal agency to rehabilitate the kashipur and jaspur units and to do all the needful as was required to be done by ..... facts of the case, giving rise to this writ petition are, the government of uttaranchal (now uttarakhand) under section 48 of the u.p. ..... writ petitions have been filed by the state industrial development corporation of uttaranchal (sidcul), which has been appointed as a nodal agency by the government of uttarakhand under section 48 of the u.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2002 (HC)

Mapex India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Himalayan Gold Beverages (P.) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC840b(UHC)

..... as it now stands after amendment with effect from 1.7.2002 reads as under :'revision (1)..................provided that the high court shall not, under this section, vary or reverse any order made, or any order deciding an issue, in the course of a suit or other proceeding, except where the order ..... as has been made effective from 1.7.2002 and the earlier analogous proviso to said section as applicable to the state of uttaranchal and also the abovementioned repeal and savings clause of the amended act, 2002, the contention of the learned counsel for the respondent no. ..... section 16 of the amendment act, 2002 pertaining to the repeal and savings reads as under :'(1) any amendment made, or any provision inserted in the principal act by a state legislature or high court before the commencement of this act shall, except in so far as such amendment or provisions are consistent with the principal act as amended by this act stand repealed.'7 ..... provided that in respect of cases arising out of original suits or other proceedings of any valuation, decided by the district court, the high court alone shall be competent to make an order under this section :provided further that the high court or the district court shall not under this section, vary or reverse any order including an order deciding an issue, made. ..... reorganization act, 2000 :'115 ..... this civil revision under section 115 of the code of civil procedure ('c.p.c ..... for the state of uttar pradesh with effect from 15.1.1991 for section 115, c.p.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2007 (HC)

Bhup Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ4780

..... reorganization act, 2000, for its disposal.5. ..... the magistrate on receipt of the charge-sheet, after giving necessary copies to the accused/appellant, as required under section 207 of the cr.p.c, committed the case to the court of sessions for trial. ..... 91 of 1986, whereby accused/appellant bhup singh is convicted under section 302 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as i.p.c. ..... section 113-a and section 113-b of the indian evidence act, 1872, provide that presumption as to abetment and cruelty can be gathered in the cases of suicide by a married woman and in the cases of dowry death respectively. ..... this appeal, preferred under section 374(2) of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as cr.p.c. ..... a 7) made by the deceased during her examination, under section 161 of the cr.p.c, recorded by p.w. 4, j.p. ..... for the reasons, as discussed above, we are in full agreement with the trial court that the charge of offence punishable under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... these two witnesses were taking the injured to the hospital and on its way they lodged first information report at the police out post, gular bhoz, where her statement was recorded by him under section 161 of the cr.p.c. ..... the trial court after hearing the parties found accused, bhup singh guilty of charge of offence punishable under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... learned sessions judge, on 6-8-19s6, after hearing the prosecution and the defence framed charge of offence punishable under section 302 of the i.p.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2010 (HC)

State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand). Vs. Jai Bhagwan, and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act, 2000, (central act no. ..... 185 of 1997, whereby said court has acquitted the respondents jai bhagwan and chatur narain, of the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as i.p.c. ..... 1) this appeal, preferred under section 378 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as cr.p.c ..... in the above circumstances, this court is of the view that the trial court has committed no illegality in holding that the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... after hearing the parties, the trial court found that the prosecution has failed to prove the charge against either of the two accused, and acquitted them of the charge of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... oral and documentary evidence was put to the accused under section 313 of cr.p.c. ..... after hearing the parties, the trial court (judicial magistrate, haridwar) on 10.07.1992, framed two separate charges one against jai bhagwan sharma for criminal misappropriation of public money, punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. ..... (accused ramakant was enlisted as a witness, as no offence is said to have been made out against him).4) the magistrate, on receipt of the charge sheet, provided necessary copies to the accused, as required under section 207 of cr.p.c. ..... after investigation, police submitted charge sheet against accused / respondents jai bhagwan and chatur narain, for their trail in respect of offence punishable under section 409 of i.p.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2006 (HC)

Dr. Biswas Chandra Harris (Decd.) Through L.Rs. Vs. Shambhu Dutt Joshi ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3539

..... reorganisation act, 2000, for its ..... accordingly by notice dated 21.12.1965 served on the defendant by the plaintiffs under section 106 read with section 111 of aforesaid act, they terminated the tenancy of the defendant w.e.f. ..... judgments and orders passed by both the courts below are liable to be set aside the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of ejectment of the defendant and also the one for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profits, as prayed by them at the rate of rs. ..... vide notice dated 21.12.1965, the tenancy of the defendant was terminated by the plaintiffs under section 106 read with section 111 of transfer of property act, 1882 w.e.f. ..... 11.10.1965 to the plaintiffs who demanded the rent from the defendant, denial on the part of defendant of the title of the plaintiffs vide notice dated 15.10.1965 does constitute a ground for determination of tenancy under section 111 of transfer of property act, 1882. ..... 1965, through a notice, the defendant denied title of the plaintiffs, as such the tenancy stood determined under section 111 of transfer of property act, 1882. ..... section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, was amended vide act ..... this appeal, preferred under section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, is directed against judgment and decree dated 14.12.1973, passed in civil ..... 1966 was instituted for ejectment of the defendant from the premises in question and also for recovery of arrears of rent to the tune of rs. ..... the land in suit is owned by the state of uttar pradesh? .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2006 (HC)

Bhupal and anr. Vs. State

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4463

..... this appeal, preferred under section 374(2) of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as cr. ..... 2) is allowed and he is acquitted of the charge under section 302 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. ..... and accused vinod kumar under section 302 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. ..... 1, bhupal and the one punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. ..... 2) is convicted under section 302 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. ..... in the circumstances, we are of the view, that the prosecution has been successful in proving charge under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... after hearing the arguments of prosecution and that of the defence, learned sessions judge found both the appellants guilty of the offence of which charge was framed against them and convicted accused bhupal under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... the learned sessions judge, after hearing both the prosecution and the defence, framed charge of offence punishable under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... the concerned magistrate registered the charge sheet and after giving necessary copies to the accused persons, as required under section 207 of the cr. ..... on the basis of said report crime number 107 of 1984 was registered under section 302 of the i.p.c. ..... 1) is convicted under section 302 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as i.p.c. ..... subsequently, this appeal has been received by this court under section 35 of the u.p. ..... 2000, for its disposal.4. ..... reorganization act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2006 (HC)

UdasIn Panchayati Bara Akhara Kankhal and ors. Vs. Mahant Dooj Dass (D ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2358

..... reorganisation act, 2000 ..... ), the governor of uttar pradesh is pleased to declare that as from the first day of july, 1963, all agricultural areas in the following urban areas of the state, which have been so demarcated under section 5 of the aforesaid act, shall vest in the state ..... in column 3 thereof or of a suit, application or proceedings based on a cause of action in respect of which any relief could be obtained by means of any such suit or application:provided that where a declaration has been made under section 143 in respect of any holding or part thereof, the provisions of schedule ii in so far as they relate to suits, applications or proceedings under chapter viii shall not apply to such holding or part thereof.explanation,-if the cause of action ..... shall lie from an order or decree passed under any of the proceedings mentioned in column 3 of schedule aforesaid:(3) an appeal shall lie from any decree or from an order passed under section 47 or an order of the nature mentioned in section 104 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (v of 1908) or in order xliii, rule 1 of the first schedule to that code passed by a court mentioned in column no. ..... suit for ejectment assisant commissioner boardof persons occu- collector.pying the land 1st classwithout title anddamages.as such, the above entry contained in second schedule of the aforesaid act, read with section 331 quoted above, bars the jurisdiction of the civil court in respect of the suit in possession of an agricultural land.16. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2009 (HC)

Shri Dutt Ram (Since Deceased) (Smt. Kalawati Devi W/O Late Dutt Ram a ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... reorganization act, 2000 (central act 29 of 2000), for its ..... suit filed by the plaintiff stands dismissed for specific performance, however, in view of provisions contained in section 22 of the specific relief act, 1963, it is directed that the defendant shall pay rs. ..... in view of section 46 of the indian contract act, 1872, where no time for performance of contract is specified, it is required to be performed within a ..... so, the agreement dated 02.12.1964, which is sought to be specifically enforced by the plaintiff must have been got registered under section 17 of the registration act. ..... --------------------------------------------------------------the aforesaid provision contained in the schedule of the limitation act, 1963, has two limbs-the first provides period of three years from the date fixed for the performance, and second when no period prescribed, the period of three years from the ..... this appeal, preferred under section 100 of code of civil procedure, 1908, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 12.04.1988, passed by district judge, almora, in civil ..... that the defendant paid the amount of arrears of rent amounting rs. ..... on the basis of the so-called agreement dated 02.12.1964 and what is the nature of the document, which is referred as the agreement, and whether the suit is barred by limitation?this appeal is received by transfer under section 35 of u.p. ..... of the schedule of said act reads as under:---------------------------------------------------------------54. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //