Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of judgment of indra sawhney, certain extraordinary circumstances have been referred to which cannot be said to be cast in stone. the extra-ordinary circumstances provided in paragraph 810 i.e. of far- flung and remote area cannot be cast in stone and forever unchanging. he submits that the same was given only by way of example and cannot be considered exhaustive .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... absurd situation would arise if two inconsistent laws, each of equal validity, could exist side by side within the same territory. [salmond jurisprudence , p.32].88. stone j.of the american supreme court in united states v. patrick b. classic [1941 scc online us sc112313 us299(1941)]. expressed the : important principle of constitutional ..... fundamentally wrong in singling out an economic criterion for reservation?. is it that they do not belong to a homogenous 51 group?. is it cast in stone that they (beneficiaries of reservation) should belong to homogenous group?. why cannot economic criterion be a ground for the state s affirmative action?.65. the ..... and more backward on the basis of their relative social backwardness. we had also given the illustration of two occupational groups, viz., goldsmiths and vaddes (traditional stone-cutters in andhra pradesh); both are included within other backward classes . if these two groups are lumped together and a common reservation is made, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... only done to give effect to the legislative intent by correcting faultiness of expression 194. he has relied on joint directors of mines safety vs. m/s tandur and nayandgi stone quarries (p) ltd.195 to contend that the word and was interpreted as or by the court to give effect to the legislative intent of the mines act, 1952196. (xxxix .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC920IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1011 of 2022 Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Petitioners Versus Union of India Respondent With Writ Petition (Civil) No.93 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.5 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.8 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.9 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.11 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.12 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1020 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1105 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1141 of 2022 1 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1142 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.1150 of 2022 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.159 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.129 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.260 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.6 of 2023 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.319 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.7 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.10 of 2023 With T. C. (Civil) No.13 of 2023 And with Writ Petition (Civil) No.478 of 2023 2 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS etal. v. SEBELIUS, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, etal. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 11393.Argued March 26, 27, 28, 2012Decided June 28, 2012[ 1 ] In 2010, Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in order to increase the number of Americans covered by health insurance and decrease the cost of health care. One key provision is the individual mandate, which requires most Americans to maintain minimum essential healt...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... have to be utilised for the welfare of the common people.91. more than three decades ago, justice o.chinnapa reddy in state of tamil nadu v. m/s.hind stone and others [a.i.r1981sc711 sounded a note of caution to all governments in following words: "6. rivers, forests, minerals and such other resources constitute a nation's natural wealth .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h December, 2017 FAO3452016 and CM Appln.26849/2016 BRIJESH KUMAR VERMA ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Mr.Jatin Kumar, Advocates versus AURANGJEB & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC GNCTD. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the order dated 6th May, 2016 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.10,69,008/- along with interest @ 12% per annum has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. The appellant is the owner of property bearing No.BU-48, Pitampura, Delhi on which a four storey building was being constructed in March 2012. On 6th March, 2012, the roof (lintel) of the third floor was being laid. Respondent no.1 and his father were FAO3452016 Page 1 of 72 working as labourers on the construction site, along with 12-13 other labourers. According to res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Beal v. Doe - 432 U.S. 438 (1977) U.S. Supreme Court Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 (1977) Beal v. Doe No. 75-554 Argued January 11, 1977 Decided June 20, 1977 432 U.S. 438 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Syllabus Title XIX of the Social Security Act establishes a Medical Assistance (Medicaid) program, under which participating States financially assist qualified individuals in five general categories of medical treatment, state plans being required to establish "reasonable standards . . . for determining . . . the extent of medical assistance under the plan which are consistent with" Title XIX's objectives. Respondents, who are eligible for medical assistance under Pennsylvania's Medicaid plan and who were denied financial assistance for desired nontherapeutic abortions pursuant to state regulations limiting such assistance to abortions certified by physicians as medically necessary, brought this action seeking injunctive and declaratory r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... in the ascertainment of meaning, everything which is logically relevant should be admissible. recently, an eminent indian jurist has reviewed the legal position and expressed his 97 agreement with julius stone and justice frankfurter. of course, nobody suggests that such extrinsic materials should be decisive but they must be admissible. authorship and interpretation must mutually illumine and interact. there is authority .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... al. as amici curiae 20 (on behalf of 49 "church denominations"); see brief for holy orthodox church as amicus curiae 12-14. [ footnote 3/10 ] the dissent in stone did not dispute this proposition; rather, it argued that posting the ten commandments on schoolroom walls has a secular purpose. 449 u.s. at 449 u. s. 43 -46 ..... was unquestionably a theological basis for the connecticut statute that the court invalidated in griswold. our jurisprudence, however, has consistently required a secular basis for valid legislation. see, e.g., stone v. graham, 449 u. s. 39 , 449 u. s. 40 (1980) (per curiam). [ footnote 3/10 ] because i am not aware of any secular basis for ..... disclaimer is totally meaningless. the plurality opinion is filled with winks, and nods, and knowing glances to those who would do away with roe explicitly, but turns a stone face to anyone in search of what the plurality conceives as the scope of a woman's right under the due process clause to terminate a pregnancy free from the .....
Tag this Judgment!