Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Jan-07-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.684/2004 Smt. Vimla & ORS.versus Shri Kalu @ Kantilal & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 07.01.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.M.C.Bishnoi ) for the appellants. Mr.A.K.Dadhich ) for the respondents. Mr.L.R.Pooniya ) ---- BY THE COURT: This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 31.05.2003 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dungarpur ('the Tribunal').whereby, for the death of one Laxamanlal, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.6,16,000/- as compensation alongwith interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing application for compensation ('the application') i.e.10.06.1998. However, the Insurance Company has been exonerated from the liability to pay the compensation. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: on 23.09.1997, the deceased Laxamanlal was riding on a Motor Cycle alongwith Kiran Kumar and Manjula, when it collided with a Jeep bearing Registration No.R...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on : Apr-30-2014
SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 1/42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & Others. S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.5988/2006 DATE OF JUDGMENT :30. h April, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Anil Bhandari, for the petitioner. Mr.Jagdish Vyas, for the National Insurance Company. BY THE COURT:1. Whether it was resignation. from service or retirement. voluntarily taken by the petitioner from his employer, National Insurance Company, is the question involved in the present case.2. The petitioner Manohar Singh, was appointed as a Development Inspector on 09 August 1979 and since then he continuously served the respondent Insurance Company till 2006 for 27 years. On 18 January 2006, due to some unavoidable family SBCWP No.5988/2006 Manohar Singh vs. Union of India & ors. Judgment dt;30/4/2014 2/42 circumstances, the petitioner informed the Deputy General Manager of th...
Tag this Judgment!