Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-29-1981
Reported in : AIR1982Raj205; 1981()WLN650
ORDERN.M. Kasliwal, J.1. According to the allegations made in the writ petition, the petitioner M/s. Praia Sahkari Udyog Bharatpur Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Society) is a Multi-Unit Co-operative Society which is governed under the Multi-Unit Cooperative Societies Act, 1942 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Act). It was originally registered under the Rajasthan Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the Rajasthan Act) on 3-11-1971 vide registration No. 2079 and later on sought an amendment vide resolutions passed in the general body meeting held on 29-11-1971, notice of which was served upon the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Rajasthan vide registry receipt receipt No. 678, dated 7-12-1971 for seeking amendment for the adoption of Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and rules made thereunder on the ground that the proposed principal place of business of the petitioner stands shifted from Bharatpur to Launi (U. P.). An order dated 3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Dec-11-1981
Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)372
..... to ''the claimants') against the rajasthan state road transport corporation, the appellant herein, and shri hari rain driver respondent no. 3 under section 110-a of the act. in the said claim petition the claimants had claimed for rs ..... at the date of death, may represent a multiplier of twenty or more. similarly, in mavne gregar on damages, pages 42-43 it has been stated:it is impossible to the state with any precision what the multiplier should be because ..... submitted that the figure of 60 years fixed by the claims tribunal, is too low in view of the improvement in life expectancy, all over the country & especially in view of the family history of the deceased. taking into consideration the evidence ..... accidents act, 1885, in the matter of determination of compensation, but still the general principles with the regard to the assessment of damages applicable to cases of fatal accidents under the law of torts, would be applicable to claims for compensation under section 110b of the 'act and according ..... aforesaid provision was inserted in me act by motor vehicles (amendment) act no. 76 of 1956. prior to the insertion of the aforesaid, provision, claims for compensation arising out of motor ..... corporation of delhi v. subhagwati and ors. : [1966]3scr649 , the supreme court affirmed the judgement of the high court assessing compensation under the fatal accidents act, by applying the multiplier method.23. similarly, in sheikhupra transpor co. ltd. v. northern india transporters' insurance .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Oct-15-1981
Reported in : AIR1982Raj139
ORDER1. A number of writ petitions have been filed challenging the validity of Section 15 of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 (Act No. 11 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Arguments hare been heard in the above two writ petitions. The above two writ petitions raise some common questions, so I think it convenient to dispose them of by this order.2. In S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 481 of 1980 filed by Sanwalram, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Raisinghnagar by his order dated July 23, 1971 (Ex. 1) decided his ceiling case holding that he has no land in the excess of the ceiling area. The petitioner Sanwalram's case was decided under Chapter III-B of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the old Ceiling Law') and the proceedings were also taken against the petitioner Sanwalram under the Act and the Authorised Officer (Ceiling) Raisinghnagar by his order, dated July 11, 1975 (Exhibit 2) dropped the proceedings of ceiling ho...
Tag this Judgment!