Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-21-1972
Reported in : AIR1972P& H414
1. This appeal has been directed under Section 82(2) of the Employees' State Insurance Act (hereinafter called the Act) against the order dated May 7, 1968, of the Employees' Insurance Court, Bhiwani, whereby the said Court dismissed the application, moved by the appellant under Section 66 read with Section 75(2)(c) of the Act for recovery of Rs. 13,781.25 p. from Messrs. Dalmia Dadri Cement Ltd. (hereinafter called the respondent No. 1) by way of reimbursement, on the short ground that it (the application) was not maintainable since Section 66 of the Act had been repealed by the Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act No. 44 of 1966 (hereinafter called the Amending Act), before the making of the application.2. In short, the case of the appellant is that it is Employees' State Insurance Corporation, and respondent No. 1 in factory within the meaning of the Act. Rulia Ram was in the employment of respondent No. 1 as Hopper-man and was duly registered under the provisions of the Act w...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-26-1972
Reported in : AIR1973P& H104
1. These five appeals will be disposed of by this judgment which have been numbered as F.A.O. Nos. 41, 42, 44, 96 of 1966 and 173 of 1967. All the appeals arise out of one judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') which was passed in five claim petitions, details of which are given here under. I have also given the number of appeals against each claim in which it has been filed:--Sr. No. ___________________ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Claim application No. ___________________ 15/CT of 1964 19/CT of 1964 20/CT of 1964 21/CT of 1964 22/CT of 1964 Name of the Parties ___________________ Rani Bai Bajaj and others. v. Darshan Singh and others. Dewan Manmohan Lal v. Darshan Singh and others Pritam Singh v. Darshan Singh and others. Mathura Dass v. Darshan Singh and others. Shrimathi Bhagwanti and others v. Darshan Singh and others Appeal, if field with number and the name of the appellant ___________________ (i) Appeal filed by Rani Bai Bajaj for enhanceme...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Apr-11-1972
Reported in : [1973]32STC283(P&H)
D.K. Mahajan J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana, by its order dated 10th August, 1970, referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court :Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the agreement between M/s, Kelvinator of India (assessee) and M/s. Spencer & Co. Ltd., M/s. Blue Star Engineering Co. and M/s. General Equipment Ltd., in pursuance of which the refrigerators manufactured by M/s. Kelvinator of India at Faridabad moved to Delhi were merely for distribution of goods between the principal and his agents or were agreements of sale between two parties ?2. When another reference No. G.S.T. 1 of 1965, (M/s. Krishan Lal Kashmiri Lal v. The State [1971] 27 S.T.C. 578, was placed before me and Sandhawalia, J., by our order dated 8th January, 1970, we directed 'the Tribunal to state the case properly. In order to guide the Tribunal, we suggest that a copy of an income-tax reference pending in this court be sent to the Tribunal so that it is known how a case...
Tag this Judgment!