Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jun-22-2001
Reported in : 2001(II)OLR502
ORDERB.P. Das, J.1. The United India Insurance Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Insurer') has filed this appeal challenging the award dated 27.6.1998 passed by the 2nd M.A.C.T. (S.D.), Berhampur in M.A.C. No. 837 of 1996 (656/96). Respondents 1 to 3 were the claimants before the Tribunal.2. Facts of the case, briefly stated, are that on 7.10.1996 at about 3 p.m. on N.H. No. 5 near Rambha Sama Ghati while the deceased Antara Pradhan who was the husband of respondent No. 1, father of respondent No. 2 and son of respondent No. 3, was standing on the left side of the road, a truck bearing registration No. WMQ 5123 being driven in rash and negligent manner dashed against him causing his instantaneous death. The claim application was filed claiming compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the appellant and respondent No. 4.3. The owner of the offending vehicle did not. contest the case and was set ex parte. The present appellant-insurer contested the case and filed written statement ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Dec-18-2001
Reported in : 93(2002)CLT337
B. Panigrahi, J.1. The writ petitioner has challenged the legality, propriety and validity of the order by which opp. parties 1 and 5 have appointed opp. party No. 7 as the President of the District Consumer Redressal Forum, Bhadrak (In short 'District Forum') on the ground, interalia, that opp. party No. 7 practised fraud and misrepresentation while procuring the order of appointment in his favour.2. Opp. party No. 3 issued an advertisement calling upon the candidates for the post of President, District Forum which were lying vacant in different districts of Orissa on 5.12.2000. The petitioner vis-a-vis opp. party No. 7 along with other candidates had applied for the post of President in the District forum, Bhadrak. Subsequently opp. party No. 5 issued a letter inviting the petitioner and other candidates to attend the interview. Petitioner as well as other candidates in terms thereof appeared in the interview where it is said that opp. party No. 7 was selected and was appointed as th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Decided on : Oct-09-2001
Reported in : [2002]112CompCas527(Orissa); [2002(92)FLR945]; 2001(II)OLR593
P.K. Mohanty, J.1. The Petitioners assail the order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under Annexure-3, the notice of attachment of movable properties given by the Recovery Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (Annexure-4), the notice of the R.P.F. Commissioner-11 (Complain and Recovery Officer), State of Orissa (Annexure-6) and the order of attachment issued by the Recovery Officer (Annexure-8) and for a declaration that any action in pursuance of the aforesaid notices are null and void and without jurisdiction.2. Petitioner No. 1, the Industrial Development Corporation, Orissa Ltd. (In short 'I.D.C.') is a Government owned company and petitioner No. 2 ABS Spinning Orissa Limited (In short 'ABS Spinning') is a subsidiary of petitioner No. 1. The petitioners' case in short is that the proceedings were started by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner against Petitioner No. 2, the ABS Spinning for recovery of Provident Fund dues and in those proceedings certain as...
Tag this Judgment!