Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-21-1965
Reported in : (1966)0GLR156
..... act, 1956, a period of fifteen years is provided to shareholders to claim payment of the amount of dividend or return of capital due to them before the moneys are paid over into the public revenues of the union and this period of fifteen years is provided for shareholders who would in all probability be literate and educated. even in the american cases which were referred in the course of the arguments, namely, anderson national bank v. luckett [88 l. ed. 692] and connecticut mutual life insurance ..... claim, the authority shall have the powers conferred by, and shall follow the procedure (in so far as it is applicable) followed in giving effect to the provisions of, that act. (8) if, in deciding any claim under sub-section (7), the authority allows the whole or part of such claim, it shall declare that the unpaid ..... [(1838) 4 m. & w. 171], and was recognized by this court as still being the rule in the case of new york life insurance company v. public trustee [(1924) 2 ch. 101]. the difficulty in that case was that a corporation, unlike an individual, can be residing in two places at one and the same time, a possibility not within the contemplation of ..... the two statutes but by the mere existence of the two pieces of legislation. the reason behind this rule is explained by dixon, j., in ex parte mclean [(1930) 43 c.l.r. 472 at 483] to be that by prescribing the rule of conduct to be observed in regard to a particular subject the paramount legislature shows an intention to cover the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Sep-03-1965
Reported in : AIR1966Guj293; 1966CriLJ1429
Shelat, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and Order passed on 22-4-1964 by Mr. N. B. Desai, Special Judge, Rajkot whereby the accused-appellant came to be convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for four months in respect of offences punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The accused-appellant was serving as a Medical Officer, Government City Dispensary at Morvi during the period from May to July 1963. He was class III Officer and was in charge of an out-door dispensary. On the upper storey of the dispensary-building, he had his residential quarters. The dispensary was a free dispensary for all people and that its working hours were 8-30 a.m. to 12-0 p.m. and from 4-0 p.m. to 6-30 p.m. On 6-5-1963 one Natvarsinhji alias Natubha Mansinhbhai of Derala had gone to Morvi along with his servants...
Tag this Judgment!