Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-09-2014
..... section 5a and section 5b, respectively, of the employees' provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or the "indian airlines" and "air india" corporations established under section 3 of the air corporations act, 1953 (27 of 1953), or the life insurance corporation of india established under section 3 of the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (31 of 1956), or the oil and natural gas commission established under section 3 of the oil and natural gas commission act, 1959 (43 of 1959), or the deposit insurance and credit guarantee corporation established under section 3 of the deposit insurance and credit guarantee corporation act, 1961 (47 of 1961), or the central warehousing corporation established under section 3 of the warehousing corporations act ..... thus noticed that in this case cited by mr. malik, the issue of a contractual appointment for specific periods was not in question and as such the applicability of sub-clause (bb) of clause (oo) to section 2 of the act was not involved. however, the applicability of section 25-f, even in a case where an appointment was without recourse to rules of recruitment, equal opportunity and de hors a sanctioned post ..... court award. with regard to backwages payable, it would now be in relation to the emoluments due under section 17-b of the act.38. as regards the application filed seeking benefits of section 17b of the act, which should correctly have been decided by this court (this bench), at the initial stage itself; .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-09-2014
-1- CWP No.10102 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.10102 of 2004 Date of decision: 09.07.2014 Punjab State Warehousing Corporation, Chandigarh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. Yes 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?. Yes 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Yes Present: - Mr.N.D.S.Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.V.Ramswaroop, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16.10.2000 (Annexure P-5) and order dated 07.04.2004 (Annexure P-6) passed by Principal Secretary, Local Government, Punjab, whereby revision petition filed by respondent No.3 has been...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-22-2014
CWP No.24029 of 2013 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24029 of 2013. Date of decision:22. 01.2014 The Assistant Superintendent of Post Office ...Petitioner Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II and another ...Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA ***** Present: Mr. Vikram Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner. **** G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.(Oral).1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the award dated 4.3.2013 (Annnexure P-10) whereby the Labour Court-II, Chandigarh has substituted the punishment of removal with stoppage of two increments permanently and held that the workman is entitled to be reinstated without payment of back wages.2. From the record of the writ petition, it transpires that the demand notice dated 5.7.2004 (Annexure P-6) was served upon by the petitioner challenging the termination on the basis of which reference was made to the Labour Court.3. As per the statement of claim, the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-27-2014
Kumar Vinod 2014.01.31 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Rs.No.3763 of 2013 (O&M) [1].****** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.3763 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision:27.01.2014 Life Insurance Corporation of India ...Appellant Versus Balwinderjit Kalia ...Respondent CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain Present: Mr.Baldev Raj Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of `6,66,727/-, out of which `4,16,727/- was claimed towards rent and `2,50,000/- as interest. It is alleged that the defendant took the demised premises on rent @ `4,800/- per month in the year 1984, with increase of 15% every five yeaRs.The rent was increased from time to time and in the year 2000, it was `7,311/- per month. It is alleged that since the defendant failed to pay the arrears of rent w.e.f.01.06.2004, therefore, the plaintiff filed application for ejectment under Section 13 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-08-2014
-1- Rs.No.2497 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.2497 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2014 Life Insurance Corporation of India ....Appellant Versus Sudesh Chaudhary ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not ?. 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?. Present: - Mr.B.R.Mahajan, Advocate, for the appellant. ***** PARAMJEET SINGH, J. This regular second appeal by defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.03.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division).Jalandhar, whereby the suit for recovery filed by the plaintiff was decreed as well as against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2013 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, whereby the appeal preferred by the appellant has been allowed partly. For convenience sake, reference to parties is being made as pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-13-2014
108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.69 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2014 Municipal Committee Bawal ...Appellant V/s. Ajit Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN. Present: Mr.Ajay Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant. *** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (Oral).The defendant is in appeal against the judgment and decree of the fiRs.appellate Court by which the suit filed by the plaintiff has been decreed. The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction in order to restrain the defendant from interfering in his possession and demolish the construction raised by him over his land as per the site plan submitted on 19.03.2007. The case of the plaintiff is that he had submitted a site plan for the purpose of sanction to erect residential house on his land on 19.03.2007 (Ex.DW1/H) by depositing requisite fee (Ex.P1) and when nothing was heard from the defendant till 19.05.2007, he started raising the construction and completed the same. Bu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. RSA No.552 of 1988 (O&M) Date of decision:04. 02.2014 Life Insurance Corporation -----Appellant(s) Vs. Smt. Nirmala Devi Sood -----Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG1 Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?.2. To be referred to reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr. I.K. Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ranjit Mehta, Advocate and Mr. B.R. Mahajan, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. --- RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J.The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for recovery of Rs.47,340/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its recovery against the defendant-appellant on the basis of the insurance policy. While contesting the suit, the defendant-appellant admitted the issuance of various policies in the name of the deceased K.D. Sood. It was further pleaded that payment of various insurance ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jul-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.2492 of 2002 (O&M) Date of decision:24.07.2014 Sudesh Sharma and others ... Appellants versus Prahalad Kumar Garg and another .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate, for the appellants. Mr. Deepak Grewal, Advocate, for Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rohit Goswami,Advocate, for Mr. Vinod Chaudhry, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. Yes.2. To be referred to the reporters or not ?. Yes.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?.Yes. ---- K.Kannan, J.(Oral) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of claim for compensation filed in a petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. It was a case of the deceased who was a passenger in a car when the driver drove against a tree and killed the passenger. The petition was filed under Section 163-A of the MV Act and t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-28-2014
CM No.5434 of 2010 in/and LPA No.1807 of 2013 (O & M) and connected matters -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CM No.5434 of 2010 in/and 1. LPA No.1807 of 2010 (O & M) Date of decision : 28.1.2014 Seth Nand Lal Bajaj Educational Charitable Society, Chandigarh ........Applicant-Appellant versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents 2. LPA No.1651 of 2010 (O & M) Ideal Private Schools Association (Regd.).Faridabad ........Appellant versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents 3. LPA No.1652 of 2010 (O & M) Sarvhitkari Educational Society (Regd.) Chandigarh, Jalandhar ........Appellant versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents 4. LPA No.1653 of 2010 (O & M) Association of the PSEB Affiliated Schools (Punjab) (Regd.).Ludhiana ........Appellant versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents 5. LPA No.1678 of 2010 (O & M) Haryana Progressive School's Conference (Regd.).Faridabad ...Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ....Respond...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-20-2014
C.W.P.No.13517 of 2012 (O&M) [ 1 ].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH C.W.P.No.13517 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 20,2014 Smt. Jagdish Kanwal .............................Petitioner Versus Life Insurance Corporation of India, Mumbai and others ..........................................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Ms.Justice Ritu Bahri 1.To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.Ashok Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner/s. Mr.Rajesh K. Sharma, Advocate for the respondents..RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) This petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 15.7.2011 (Annexure P3) passed by respondent No.2 terminating the Agency of the petitioner and also the order dated 29.3.2012 (Annexure P5) passed by respondent No.3 whereby her appeal has also been dismissed. Heard counsel for the parties. Kaur Rupinder 2014.05.29 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this ...
Tag this Judgment!