Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-01-2012
K. Kannan, J. CM 2100 of 2012 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the main writ petition is taken up for hearing today itself. CWP 21618 of 2008 The petition challenges non selection of the petitioner as a candidate to the post of Apprentice Development Officer (for short 'ADO'). The advertisement notification (Annexure P-1) stipulates that the selection will be as per the procedure notified on the official website of the respondents. The petitioner has filed CM No.303 of 2009 placing on record the selection procedure as given in the official website. The selection procedure states that the selection would be made on the basis of a written test followed by an interview of the candidates who qualify in the written test. As a matter of record, the petitioner was found to be eligible and called for the interview, he having been placed at Serial No.5 in the order of merit. The petitioner has, however, not been selected allegedly on the ground that his perform...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-21-2012
Civil Writ Petition No.22898 of 2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.22898 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:21. 11.2012 Pawittar Singh Walia .....Petitioner. Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others .....Respondents. CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr.Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amit Kohar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** 1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. ***** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. The petitioner, by way of instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeks to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court, challenging the orders dated 8.4.2008, 13.10.2009 and 18.4.2012 passed by respondents No.3, 2 and 1, respectively, thereby declining the request of the petitioner for transferring, in his favour, the commercial site No.180, Sector 26, Grain Market, Chandigarh. Facts f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-12-2012
Hemant Gupta, J.- This order shall dispose of afore-mentioned six appeals raising common question of law; as to whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation in respect of injuries/death of the passengers travelling on the roof of the bus. 2. The said appeals have been placed before us in view of the conflict of two judgments of this Court reported as The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. The Samundri Roadways Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others 1984 PLR 689 and New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Punjab Government and others 1989 (2) PLR 568. Since the issue is legal, the facts, as are necessary for appreciating the question raised, are taken from FAO No. 1043 of 1991. 3. In the said case, Jai Pal (deceased) boarded the bus bearing registration No. HYM - 1438 from Rewari to go to village Dhawana. The said bus was over- loaded and so Jai Pal and other passengers boarded the roof of the bus, which was driven by Hari Chand. The bus was being driven in a rash and negligent manner. When the s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-16-2012
CRM M-25733 of 2011 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-25733 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 16, 2012 Daljit Singh Gujral and others ... Petitioners Versus Jagjit Singh Arora and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2) To be referred to the Reporters or not?. 3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr. R.S. Cheema, Sr. Advocate with Mr. K.S. Nalwa, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Jagjit Singh Arora, respondent No.1 in person. Paramjeet Singh, J.Medical profession is one of the most oldest professions of the world and is the most humanitarian one. There can be no better service than to serve the suffering, wounded and the sick. Doctors are treated as equivalent to Lord Vishnu. Unfortunately, not a days with the upcoming of corporate culture, medical profession which was highly respected is indicating decline of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-04-2012
FAO No.740 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH FAO No.740 of 2009 Date of decision December 4, 2012 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. ....... Appellant Versus Smt. Mango Bai and others ........ Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Seema Pasricha, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. **** 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.Yes 2. To be referred to the reporters or not?. Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?.Yes K. Kannan, J (oral).1. The appeal has been brought before this Court on a remand from the Supreme Court on the observation that this Court, while allowing the appeal filed by the Insurance Company, has not delved into the reasons assigned by the Tribunal and substantially reduced the amount without finding any patent error in the award of the Tribunal.2. This Court while disposing of the case on 27.7.2010 was consid...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-23-2012
FAO No.4854 o1. FAO No.4856 of 2011 FAO No.4855 of 2011 FAO No.4853 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :23. 11.2012 (i) FAO No.4854 of 2011 Satya Devi ....Appellant V/s Mahabir Singh & ors....Respondents (ii) FAO No.4856 of 2011 Malkiat Singh & anr....Appellants V/s Mahabir Singh & ors....Respondents (iii) FAO No.4855 of 2011 Mohinder Singh & anr....Appellants V/s Mahabir Singh & ors....Respondents (iv) FAO No.4853 of 2011 Sunil Kumar & anr....Appellants V/s Mahabir Singh & ors....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the appellants in all the 4 appeals. Mr.Jitender K. Sehrawat, Advocate for respondent no 1. in all the 4 appeals. Mr.Mrigank Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. in all the 4 appeals. RAJAN GUPTA J. This order will dispose of four appeals emanating out of the award passed by the tribunal at Kurukshetra. FAO No.4854 o2. FAO No.4856 of 2011 FAO No.4855 of 2011 FAO No.4853 of 2011 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-23-2012
FAO No.6654 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.6654 of 2011 Date of decision :23. 11.2012 Durga Devi ....Appellant V/s Manjeet Singh & ors....Respondents BEFORE : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr.Krishan Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Suman Jain, Advocate for respondents. RAJAN GUPTA J. Appellant has filed this appeal to impugn the order passed by tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation. Learned counsel for the appellant has primarily raised the plea that claim being under section 163-A of the Act, deduction could not be more than 1/3rd. Besides, multiplier ought to be according to age of the deceased and not the parents. Plea has been opposed by learned counsel representing the respondents. According to him, adequate compensation has been granted by the tribunal. Thus, award passed by the tribunal needs to be upheld. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. On 10.06.2009, deceased Parveen Kumar was returning home after attending...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-23-2012
L.N. Mittal, J. Oral: CM No.13743-CII of 2012 The application is allowed and Annexure P-5 is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. CIVIL REVISION NO.2183 OF 2012 One of the tenants Parminder Singh has filed this revision petition under Section 18-A(8) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (in short, the Act) assailing order dated 21.03.2012 passed by learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana thereby dismissing application filed by petitioner herein as well as application filed by proforma respondents No.2 and 3 herein (brother and mother of the petitioner) for leave to contest the ejectment petition, which was instituted by respondent No.1-landlord- Jatinder Singh Grewal under Section 13-B of the Act. The landlord alleged that he is Non-Resident Indian (NRI). The demised property (ground floor portion of the house) was let out to Ravinder Singh father of the petitioner herein (predecessor of petitioner and respondents No.2 and 3 herein). The landlord has one room on fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Cross Objection No.8-CII of 1992 in/and FAO No.255 of 1991 (O&M) Date of decision:13.12.2012. United India Insurance Company ...Appellant versus Rajinder Kaur Pal and others ....Respondents CORAM: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: Mr.Gopal Mittal Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.G.S.Bhatia, Advocate, for the respondents. ---- 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. No.2. To be referred to the reporters or No.?. No.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?. No.---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. This appeal must be taken as continuation of the order already passed by this Court on 05.10.2012. I have observed in the order that a connected appeal in FAO No.1177 of 1991 arising out of the same accident concluded the issue only in respect of a claim against the insurer and the owner of the car involved in the accident since the above appeal had been filed only by the owner of the car and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-05-2012
NawabSingh, J. Oral: 1. This judgment shall dispose of aforesaid five appeals because they have arisen out of a common Award. 2. FAOs No. 6301, 6302 of 2011 have been filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited, Chandigarh and FAOs No. 404-406 of 2012 have been filed by the claimants against the Award dated June 2nd, 2011 passed by the the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (for short “the Tribunal), Chandigarh. 3. On April 20th, 2007 Sobha Nair, her husband Murlidhar Nair and her mother Thankan A. Menon were travelling in a car bearing No. PB-65-E-7599 from Delhi to Chandigarh. Sarwan Singh was driver of the car. At about 4.15 AM, when they reached near village Lalru in front of Rana Polycot Factory, a tanker truck No.HR-38-8373 driven by Hans Raj, in a rash and negligent manner, came from opposite direction, that is, Chandigarh side at a fast speed and swerved towards its wrong side and rammed into the car. Murlidharan, Sobha Nair and Sarwan Singh died on the spot. Thankan...
Tag this Judgment!