Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 section 43 application of the insurance act Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.139 seconds)

Oct 14 1988 (HC)

S.S. Sahni and ors. Vs. Registrar of Companies and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-14-1988

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas556(P& H)

G.R. Majithia, J.1. Petition under Section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, has been moved by Prestolite of India Ltd., through its managing director and directors, seeking the following reliefs :(a) That the petitioners be excused and relieved from all proceedings criminal in nature including that of F. I. R. No. 143 of 1981, F. I. R. No. 134 of 1982 and F. I. R. No. 39 of 1983 in respect of the alleged non-deposit of the contributions of the employees' shares and stay further proceedings pending in the court of Miss Raj Rani, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Faridabad, in respect of the said FIRs ; (b) stop all other proceedings pending with the Collector, Faridabad, for recovery of employer's shares of provident funds/ESI and also stayfurther proceedings at the hands, of Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation, for the alleged contravention of the ESI Act and the Scheme framed thereunder and/or any contravention of the Income-tax Act with reference to the tax deduc...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 1988 (HC)

Smt. Bimla Devi and ors. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-04-1988

Reported in : AIR1989P& H174

..... and 2 are liable to pay jointly and severally. but liability being covered by the policy of insurance issued by respondent no. 3 in favour of owner, the insurer will pay the said amount to the claimant with interest and costs.'the correctness of this decision was challenged in this court in first appeal from the order, under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act, by the defendants in the claim application. the appeal was dismissed in limine and the award of the motor accident claim tribuanl was upheld ..... 487/1986, a young boy aged 12 years, who was a student of 4th class, was killed in an accident. the parents of the victim made a claim for damages. the tribunal allowed compensation of rs. 43,200/- on account of loss of life. in arriving at this figure, it adopted the following criteria :--'it is common knowledge that even the farm labourers these days arc available only at rs. 20/- per clay ..... age-group of 5 to 10 years are tabulated as under : --20) 8 male 6,000/- 1970 ac3 1 10 : (air 1970 sc 376) (date of accident 28-2-1956)21) 8 ' 6,000/- 1966 acj 321 : (air 1966 mys 346) 22) 7 ' 10,000/- 1969 acj 344 23) 9 ' 5,000/- 1969 acj ..... between rs. 2,000/- to rs. 6,000/-. in peculiar circumstances, like the one in pushpinder kaur sekhon v. corporal sharma, 1986 acc cj 591 : (air 1985 punj and hry 81) where the mother of the deceased child had undergone tubectomy and section evacuation of the uterus, and could not, therefore, have any more children, s. s. sodhi, j., awarded a sum of rs .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //